Which blowout was more impressive?

Honestly homerism aside I have to say Ravens. For two reasons.

1. Coast to coast road game for them on primetime
2. They put up nearly 300 yards rushing on the, what was #4 rushing defense in the game and didn't punt until RG3 was in the game. 6 straight TD drives and 7th being a FG.

They had complete domination of that game from start to finish on both sides of the ball.

We beat the better opponent but we had our stumbles in the process.

Both were impressive but we beat the better team and held one of the greatest QBs of all time to possibly his worst game ever. That only happens once a HoF career. Goff on the other hand threw exactly 0 tds in November and we actually held him to way fewer yards than Balt. did.

Originally posted by Jiks:
Both were impressive but we beat the better team and held one of the greatest QBs of all time to possibly his worst game ever. That only happens once a HoF career. Goff on the other hand threw exactly 0 tds in November and we actually held him to way fewer yards than Balt. did.

lol now you're making me rethink my choice.

Originally posted by genus49:

Honestly homerism aside I have to say Ravens. For two reasons.

1. Coast to coast road game for them on primetime
2. They put up nearly 300 yards rushing on the, what was #4 rushing defense in the game and didn't punt until RG3 was in the game. 6 straight TD drives and 7th being a FG.

They had complete domination of that game from start to finish on both sides of the ball.

We beat the better opponent but we had our stumbles in the process.

Can you please remind me of what stumbles were those? Serious questions.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by Jiks:

Both were impressive but we beat the better team and held one of the greatest QBs of all time to possibly his worst game ever. That only happens once a HoF career. Goff on the other hand threw exactly 0 tds in November and we actually held him to way fewer yards than Balt. did.

lol now you're making me rethink my choice.

Originally posted by Jiks:

Both were impressive but we beat the better team and held one of the greatest QBs of all time to possibly his worst game ever. That only happens once a HoF career. Goff on the other hand threw exactly 0 tds in November and we actually held him to way fewer yards than Balt. did.

This.
The Rams can be up and down and have been down more than up this year. Their O-line is trash.

GB was considered one of the more complete teams in the league who will be in serious contention for thr #1 seed in the NFC and we forced Rodgers into his worst game in 14 years.
Think of how many games he's played and that was the most dominant performance a defense has ever put in him.

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

Originally posted by genus49:
Honestly homerism aside I have to say Ravens. For two reasons.

1. Coast to coast road game for them on primetime
2. They put up nearly 300 yards rushing on the, what was #4 rushing defense in the game and didn't punt until RG3 was in the game. 6 straight TD drives and 7th being a FG.

They had complete domination of that game from start to finish on both sides of the ball.

We beat the better opponent but we had our stumbles in the process.

Can you please remind me of what stumbles were those? Serious questions.

The 44 yards of offense in the 4 drives after the TD off the fumble?

When you compare that to a team that didn't punt until the 4th quarter when their backup QB was playing mop up duty I'd say that's a stumble by comparison.

I would have been more impressed with the blowout of the Rams if this was last year when their offense was still hitting on all cylinders. As it stands now we held arguably the best quarterback in the NFL to 104 passing yards. Let that sink in for a moment.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

Originally posted by genus49:

Honestly homerism aside I have to say Ravens. For two reasons.

1. Coast to coast road game for them on primetime
2. They put up nearly 300 yards rushing on the, what was #4 rushing defense in the game and didn't punt until RG3 was in the game. 6 straight TD drives and 7th being a FG.

They had complete domination of that game from start to finish on both sides of the ball.

We beat the better opponent but we had our stumbles in the process.

Can you please remind me of what stumbles were those? Serious questions.

The 44 yards of offense in the 4 drives after the TD off the fumble?

When you compare that to a team that didn't punt until the 4th quarter when their backup QB was playing mop up duty I'd say that's a stumble by comparison.

Fair enough about the 4 drives. Hope they clean that up this week.

But we shouldn't compare the Ravens 6 straight TD drives to the Niners game against the Packers. (1) It was 2 different games within 4 different teams, and it has nothing to do with this week's matchup. (2) The Rams defense is nothing compare to the Niners defense. (3) We all don't know if the Ravens would score 6 straight TDs against the Niners defense which I highly highly doubt it. We gon find that out this coming Sunday. But I just know it won't happen.

After this game, then we should be able to compare how each team fare against each other.

For those who say that the rams are a bad team, I think GB is overrated AF.

Originally posted by pdizo916:
For those who say that the rams are a bad team, I think GB is overrated AF.

Yeah they are, but they beat Vikings, @Dallas, @Chiefs

Lambs only beat one solid team, Saints in LA.

Not to mention AR >>> Goff anyday....

C'mon, bruh, please

Our game against GB would have been a lot more impressive if the Chargers hadn't done pretty much the exact same thing a few weeks earlier. Even the Panthers almost beat them before their bye.

I just got around to watching the Baltimore highlights. Honestly after about 3 minutes I started laughing. All that Greg Roman read-option b*******. Oh my God a pro team still falling for that? Now that is horrid coaching preparedness. That spit was played out for years ago.

Bottom line we Crush Baltimore. They just lost their All-Pro Center. We got all we need and if Dee comes back that's a bonus. And Russell is way better at being slippery in the pocket than that dude Lamar. He's just a Speedster. Wilson way more dangerous.

31 7 us. I have no problem making this prediction. No snaps for Kittle or Sanders after the second quarter.

And totally agree with other posters about handling the read option -- hit Lamar in the grill every single play. Don't bother with the runner.

Bosa turn that chump into a greasy spot by the second quarter.

Originally posted by KittleSkittle:
Our game against GB would have been a lot more impressive if the Chargers hadn't done pretty much the exact same thing a few weeks earlier. Even the Panthers almost beat them before their bye.

Bills / Cowboys almost beat Pats. Bengals / Steelers almost beat Ravens. Tards almost beat us. AND

Zzzzzz c'mon grampy, you getting tired af

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I just got around to watching the Baltimore highlights. Honestly after about 3 minutes I started laughing. All that Greg Roman read-option b*******. Oh my God a pro team still falling for that? Now that is horrid coaching preparedness. That spit was played out for years ago.

Bottom line we Crush Baltimore. They just lost their All-Pro Center. We got all we need and if Dee comes back that's a bonus. And Russell is way better at being slippery in the pocket than that dude Lamar. He's just a Speedster. Wilson way more dangerous.

31 7 us. I have no problem making this prediction. No snaps for Kittle or Sanders after the second quarter.

The reason why this comeback is a better version by Greg (Big Twinkie) Roman is because all the pieces fit...each player do their assignments really well and they are all fast...it's like high-powered college offense on super roids.

HOWEVER, that type offense usually ran into a buzz saw when it faced a pro-style defense (like Alabama / SEC).

49ers are that SEC / Alabama type D on super roids to stop this high scoring roided out offense