SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS at NEW ORLEANS SAINTS - 2019 Game 13 | Page 4

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:09 AM

Baldie
Veteran
Posts: 23,086

Originally posted by ProfessorKel:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Baldie:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Baldie:
Because Seattle beat us in our division game. If we had beaten seattle (along with beating LA and ARI in both games) and if Seattle wins in Seattle and we end up tied, I think we would win because of our division record.

Someoen correct me if I'm wrong.

If we win out and beat them IN seattle and they STILL win the division - then that is f**king annoying.

Yeah it is!! So the best case scenario is they lose one or two games before our match-up in Seattle and hope that we win out the rest of the season.

it is insane that you've lost 2 games and one of them made that much of a difference. i cant think of a time when a division had two teams win this many games.

If we win out and beat Seattle in Seattle, our record will be 14-2 and Seattle (currently with 2 losses) will be 13-3.

It would be mathematically impossible for Seattle to own the division in this scenario.

Assuming SEA loses to LA or CAR or both

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:10 AM

#47

jvangeystel
Veteran
Posts: 1,517

Originally posted by ProfessorKel:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Because Seattle beat us in our division game. If we had beaten seattle (along with beating LA and ARI in both games) and if Seattle wins in Seattle and we end up tied, I think we would win because of our division record.

Someoen correct me if I'm wrong.

If we win out and beat them IN seattle and they STILL win the division - then that is f**king annoying.

Yeah it is!! So the best case scenario is they lose one or two games before our match-up in Seattle and hope that we win out the rest of the season.

it is insane that you've lost 2 games and one of them made that much of a difference. i cant think of a time when a division had two teams win this many games.

If we win out and beat Seattle in Seattle, our record will be 14-2 and Seattle (currently with 2 losses) will be 13-3.

It would be mathematically impossible for Seattle to own the division in this scenario.

Okay so we win out and we own that first seed. Looking forward to it.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:11 AM

#48

jvangeystel
Veteran
Posts: 1,517

Originally posted by Baldie:
Assuming SEA loses to LA or CAR or both

No because Seattle already has 2 losses so us beating them in week 17 would be loss 3 and we would only have 2.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:13 AM

#49

Jiks
Member
Posts: 29,220

This has been a s**tty week in sports dating back to Baltimore. My sports sanity needs this win.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:13 AM

#50

ProfessorKel
Veteran
Posts: 3,739

Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by ProfessorKel:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Because Seattle beat us in our division game. If we had beaten seattle (along with beating LA and ARI in both games) and if Seattle wins in Seattle and we end up tied, I think we would win because of our division record.

Someoen correct me if I'm wrong.

If we win out and beat them IN seattle and they STILL win the division - then that is f**king annoying.

Yeah it is!! So the best case scenario is they lose one or two games before our match-up in Seattle and hope that we win out the rest of the season.

it is insane that you've lost 2 games and one of them made that much of a difference. i cant think of a time when a division had two teams win this many games.

If we win out and beat Seattle in Seattle, our record will be 14-2 and Seattle (currently with 2 losses) will be 13-3.

It would be mathematically impossible for Seattle to own the division in this scenario.

Assuming SEA loses to LA or CAR or both

No, Seattle already has two losses. Even if they win their next 3 games and ONLY lose to us in week 17, they will be 13-3.

And if we win out, we will be 14-2.

We literally "control our destiny" and it is impossible for Seattle if we win our 4 remaining games.

49ers (Currently 10-2) + 4 wins = 14 and 2

Seattle (Currently 10-2) + 3 wins and 1 loss to us = 13-3

It doesn't matter if Seattle beats Carolina, AZ, and LA.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:15 AM

#51

ProfessorKel
Veteran
Posts: 3,739

Originally posted by jvangeystel:
Okay so we win out and we own that first seed. Looking forward to it.

Bingo! We basically need to win 7-in a row to have the #1 seed AND win the superbowl.

Let's see if we have what it takes!

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:22 AM

#52

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 111,617

Staley and McGlinch gettin' the work in early 👀 pic.twitter.com/fCdlZtTTjx
— 49ers on NBCS (@NBCS49ers) December 8, 2019

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM

#53

TyCore
Veteran
Posts: 12,854
NFL Pick 'em

Staley starting?

I wonder if he's going to be rusty and if he'll be subbed for if in dire need.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM

#54

mattster03
Veteran
Posts: 4,886

All we gotta do is win out and we are the #1 seed. Now if we happen to lose to the saints but win the final 3 (including Seattle) and Seattle wins them all but us, then it goes down to strength of schedule. In which case as pointed out, Minnesota and the Eagles record vs. Green bay & redskins. But that can, and will, change before the end of the season. We really need the skins to upset the eagles and the packers to beat Vikings.

That all being said if we win out we are in the driver's seat, and I think we can.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:26 AM

#55

qnnhan7
Veteran
Posts: 34,660

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Staley and McGlinch gettin' the work in early 👀 pic.twitter.com/fCdlZtTTjx
— 49ers on NBCS (@NBCS49ers) December 8, 2019

Everyone wants to be Bosa on the team lol

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:27 AM

#56

MSteitz468
Veteran
Posts: 558

Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by Baldie:
Because Seattle beat us in our division game. If we had beaten seattle (along with beating LA and ARI in both games) and if Seattle wins in Seattle and we end up tied, I think we would win because of our division record.

Someoen correct me if I'm wrong.

If we win out and beat them IN seattle and they STILL win the division - then that is f**king annoying.

Yeah it is!! So the best case scenario is they lose one or two games before our match-up in Seattle and hope that we win out the rest of the season.

If we win out, we win the division, if we lose to NO and beat sea, and tie records, flip a coin.

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:28 AM

#57

Baldie
Veteran
Posts: 23,086

Originally posted by ProfessorKel:

Originally posted by Baldie:

Originally posted by ProfessorKel:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Baldie:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Baldie:
Because Seattle beat us in our division game. If we had beaten seattle (along with beating LA and ARI in both games) and if Seattle wins in Seattle and we end up tied, I think we would win because of our division record.

Someoen correct me if I'm wrong.

If we win out and beat them IN seattle and they STILL win the division - then that is f**king annoying.

Yeah it is!! So the best case scenario is they lose one or two games before our match-up in Seattle and hope that we win out the rest of the season.

it is insane that you've lost 2 games and one of them made that much of a difference. i cant think of a time when a division had two teams win this many games.

If we win out and beat Seattle in Seattle, our record will be 14-2 and Seattle (currently with 2 losses) will be 13-3.

It would be mathematically impossible for Seattle to own the division in this scenario.

Assuming SEA loses to LA or CAR or both

No, Seattle already has two losses. Even if they win their next 3 games and ONLY lose to us in week 17, they will be 13-3.

And if we win out, we will be 14-2.

We literally "control our destiny" and it is impossible for Seattle if we win our 4 remaining games.

49ers (Currently 10-2) + 4 wins = 14 and 2

Seattle (Currently 10-2) + 3 wins and 1 loss to us = 13-3

It doesn't matter if Seattle beats Carolina, AZ, and LA.

oh yeah...right right

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:33 AM

#58

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 111,617

#49ers inactives: SS Jaquiski Tartt (ribs), DL Jullian Taylor (elbow), WR Marquise Goodwin (knee, toe), QB C.J. Beathard, RB Jeff Wilson Jr., TE Levine Toilolo, WR Dante Pettis.
— Nick Wagoner (@nwagoner) December 8, 2019

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:36 AM

#59

ayleswbj11
Veteran
Posts: 2,087

Very surprised Wilson Jr is inactive, even though Breida is back . He's been so good in the red zone

Dec 8, 2019 at 8:36 AM

#60

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 111,617

#Saints Pro Bowl left tackle Terron Armstead (ankle) is active. #49ers
— Eric Branch (@Eric_Branch) December 8, 2019

Poor decision Payton smh. Dudes gonna make his ankle worse trying to block Ford/AA/Bosa