There are 190 users in the forums

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS vs ATLANTA FALCONS - 2019 Game 14

Shop Find 49ers gear online
  • Hopper
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 12,067
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
That was so costly. #1 seed, home field advantage, playoff bye to #5 seed.


Barely anything changed. We went into the game needing to beat Seattle to win the division and we left the game needing to beat Seattle to win the division.

This is true.
Originally posted by Baldie:
That is assuming we win out

That's actually assuming we lose to LA but beat Seattle. If we win out it's over due to us having more wins.
[ Edited by tjd808185 on Dec 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM ]
Lets hope the quote "When it rains, it pours" doesn't have any thing to do with the next few weeks lol...
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Just win on Saturday and then everyone will see how this loss means nothing.

It sucks to lose but it was always going to come down to week 17 @ Seattle.

We had no major injuries in this game. That was actually more important than winning if you ask me.

At this point we cant afford any more injuries to key starters. Half of the starting D being injured is making them look average.
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
That was so costly. #1 seed, home field advantage, playoff bye to #5 seed.


If we beat the Rams (big if I know) and the Seahawks beat the Cardinals, it will be like this loss never happened. Still would come down to Week 17 either way.

This loss means nothing unless somehow the Cards beat the Seahawks at home.

Nothing changed based on this loss, at all.

Nothing changed in terms of us being the number one seed if we win out. However, had we beaten Atl and LA next week...and the Seahawks had lost somehow to Zona, we would have had the number one seed locked up before even playing them.

Yea but Seattle isn't losing at home to the Cards.

That's definitely not happening.

No chance esp. after we just gave them new life and can smell blood in the water.
[ Edited by NCommand on Dec 15, 2019 at 6:40 PM ]
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by captveg:
No. Here's the tie breakers in this scenario (49ers 11-4, Sea 12-3 going into W17).

Two Clubs
  1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs). 49ers and Seahawks TIED 1-1, move to 2
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 4-2, move to 3
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 10-4, move to 4
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 9-3, move to 5
  5. Strength of victory. W-L-T % of all opponents a team has defeated. 49ers and Seahawks beat the same teams, except 49ers beat GB, NO and WAS and the Seahawks beat PHI, MIN and ATL. The Win-Loss record between these two sets of teams is the tiebreaker
  6. Strength of schedule. IRRELEVANT, see above (assuming that GB, NO and Washington combined don't have the same record as Philly, Minn and ATL combined, in which case strength of schedule comes into play).
  7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  9. Best net points in common games.
  10. Best net points in all games.
  11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  12. Coin toss

Tie breaker would be strength of victory. If NO-GB-WAS end up with a better win % than MIN-PHI-ATL, SF wins tie breaker in this scenario.

Right now NO-GB-WAS is 24-17 with 7 games left, while MIN-PHI-ATL is 22-20 with 6 games left.

So we most likely got it. As of now our combo has 24 wins with NO still to play while Seattle's has 22 wins.

Yep.

Of course, if SF beats LA next week it makes things a lot simpler. It would just be winner take all in SEA and throw out all the other tie breakers, barring a tie against SEA in W17 if both teams go into W17 with the same record.
[ Edited by captveg on Dec 15, 2019 at 6:41 PM ]
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,542
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by captveg:
No. Here's the tie breakers in this scenario (49ers 11-4, Sea 12-3 going into W17).

Two Clubs
  1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs). 49ers and Seahawks TIED 1-1, move to 2
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 4-2, move to 3
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 10-4, move to 4
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. 49ers and Seahawks TIED 9-3, move to 5
  5. Strength of victory. W-L-T % of all opponents a team has defeated. 49ers and Seahawks beat the same teams, except 49ers beat GB, NO and WAS and the Seahawks beat PHI, MIN and ATL. The Win-Loss record between these two sets of teams is the tiebreaker
  6. Strength of schedule. IRRELEVANT, see above (assuming that GB, NO and Washington combined don't have the same record as Philly, Minn and ATL combined, in which case strength of schedule comes into play).
  7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  9. Best net points in common games.
  10. Best net points in all games.
  11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  12. Coin toss

Tie breaker would be strength of victory. If NO-GB-WAS end up with a better win % than MIN-PHI-ATL, SF wins tie breaker in this scenario.

Right now NO-GB-WAS is 24-17 with 7 games left, while MIN-PHI-ATL is 22-20 with 6 games left.

So we most likely got it. As of now our combo has 24 wins with NO still to play while Seattle's has 22 wins.

That is assuming we win out

This is assuming we beat Seattle.
How did they get 29pts when we were up by 5? My power went out during the Julio review
  • Baldie
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,267
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Just win on Saturday and then everyone will see how this loss means nothing.

It sucks to lose but it was always going to come down to week 17 @ Seattle.

We had no major injuries in this game. That was actually more important than winning if you ask me.


Yeah but we still have one more game before Seattle. Hoping no injuries next weekend.
Predictable trap game loss.

Calm the F down.

Every single team's fans melt down after every single loss. It's ridiculous.
  • Kyzen
  • Member
  • Posts: 3,117
Originally posted by cali2COniner:
How did they get 29pts when we were up by 5? My power went out during the Julio review

refs gave them extra points
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Just win on Saturday and then everyone will see how this loss means nothing.

It sucks to lose but it was always going to come down to week 17 @ Seattle.

We had no major injuries in this game. That was actually more important than winning if you ask me.

Most important part of the day. We didn't lose anyone else for once.
  • Baldie
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,267
Originally posted by cali2COniner:
How did they get 29pts when we were up by 5? My power went out during the Julio review

Lest play of game, niners were throwing it around and fumbled it
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by cali2COniner:
How did they get 29pts when we were up by 5? My power went out during the Julio review

Lest play of game, niners were throwing it around and fumbled it

Thanks
Originally posted by Baldie:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
How do you come out that flat and lose to the Falcons at home with the #1 seed, home field advantage and a playoff bye in play? Just incredible. Wow.

.............

Trap game

Honestly, it was injuries. But every team has that happen to them. Unfortunatley for us, Dee Ford going down along with some D-Linemen really screwed up why our D was so great in the beginning of the year. The rotation and athleticism, but that was all gone with Ford and the depth we've lost. If you really look at it, we HAD the game, Kittle had it easily if he went forward. You can even look at the replay of Staley and Garoppollo after you can see that they laughed like they knew he shoulda went forward (could just be my delusions). But obviously, situationally, Kittle should've knew to hold the ball and just bull forward and stay in bounds instead of juking around which caused the fumble. I think he learned this lesson at a good time, personally.
Search Share 49ersWebzone