Seahawks have a -19 point differential at home this season.
-19.
If we go into that stadium and wet ourselves we don't deserve no Super Bowl.
There are 288 users in the forums
SF 49ERS @ SEA SEAHAWKS PREGAME THREAD - 2019 Season Week 17
SF 49ERS @ SEA SEAHAWKS PREGAME THREAD - 2019 Season Week 17
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:19 PM
- Fanaticofnfl
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,784
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:19 PM
- Phoenix49ers
- Moderator
- Posts: 123,833
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Saints are the main obstacle in the playoffs.
Beating them would be a lot easier with homefield advantage and not having to go back into that dome, packed with Saints fans at full playoff pitch.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:20 PM
- SanDiego49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 50,333
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Seattle could still mathematically get the #1 seed right? If they win, New Orleans loses and Green Bay goes 1-1 doesn't Seattle win that three way tiebreaker?
New Orleans would probably get it. And you don't want that. We took our chances down there once and won (barely). I don't want to go there twice. I don't want to go to Seattle either. Avoiding Seattle and New Orleans on the road is a great idea IMO.
At best Seattle can finish with the same record as the saints if everything goes right for them. And still saints get number 1 because they beat Seahawks during the season. Mathematically there is zero chance seahawks get number 1
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Did they play head to head? I thought head to head was the first tie breaker.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:20 PM
- Niners99
- Veteran
- Posts: 43,683
Originally posted by 49ERnation:NFL f**ked the Seahawks with that flex move. 49ers are a different team in prime time games
Except when we played Seattle earlier this year.
Until we actually go up there and win one, im not going in with any confidence.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:20 PM
- RTFirefly
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,262
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Not very likely anyway. I don't see the Saints losing to the Panthers. The Panthers have packed it in for the season.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:21 PM
- GhostOfBaalke
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,105
Originally posted by RTFirefly:Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:Seattle could still mathematically get the #1 seed right? If they win, New Orleans loses and Green Bay goes 1-1 doesn't Seattle win that three way tiebreaker?
New Orleans would probably get it. And you don't want that. We took our chances down there once and won (barely). I don't want to go there twice. I don't want to go to Seattle either. Avoiding Seattle and New Orleans on the road is a great idea IMO.
At best Seattle can finish with the same record as the saints if everything goes right for them. And still saints get number 1 because they beat Seahawks during the season. Mathematically there is zero chance seahawks get number 1
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Why wouldn't Seattle be eliminated first ? They lost to the saints
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:21 PM
- illinois9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,148
Originally posted by RTFirefly:No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Saints beat Seattle and head to head is the first tie breaker, no?
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:21 PM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
Originally posted by kelson49er:
Originally posted by LVJay:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Carroll said Clowney and Shaquill Griffin didn't get better as week went on. Hedges on whether they can play next week.
— Bob Condotta (@bcondotta) December 23, 2019
I think she feels their chances are slim af, even at home. Cheat carrol remembers we lost from that missed FG and no Kwon, Sanders, Kittle...Staley / McGlinch rusty... we're getting healthy at the right time, they are not.
She is already preparing excuses ugly ass woman
Are you seriously calling a man "she" as an insult? Are you 12, and is it 1997 or something?
Pete Carroll is a joke, but you're worse. GTFO, idiot.
Simmer down. If you don't like a poster's post just block him/her. It's simple.
Don't attack posters because you're over sensitive over a mere post #Relax #SensitiveNancy
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:23 PM
- RTFirefly
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,262
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Seattle could still mathematically get the #1 seed right? If they win, New Orleans loses and Green Bay goes 1-1 doesn't Seattle win that three way tiebreaker?
New Orleans would probably get it. And you don't want that. We took our chances down there once and won (barely). I don't want to go there twice. I don't want to go to Seattle either. Avoiding Seattle and New Orleans on the road is a great idea IMO.
At best Seattle can finish with the same record as the saints if everything goes right for them. And still saints get number 1 because they beat Seahawks during the season. Mathematically there is zero chance seahawks get number 1
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Did they play head to head? I thought head to head was the first tie breaker.
In a three-way tie, head-to-head only applies if one team has beaten both of the other two, like us over NO and GB.
NO, GB, and Sea do not have a three-way head-to-head winner. That tiebreaker would be skipped over.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:23 PM
- Fanaticofnfl
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,784
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by RTFirefly:
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Saints beat Seattle and head to head is the first tie breaker, no?
When three teams are tied it gets really stupid. Basically turns into a brand new BS tiebreaker that Seattle wins. Would be so them to get the #1 seed that way.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:25 PM
- CHAMBAZ
- Veteran
- Posts: 451
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by RTFirefly:Originally posted by GhostOfBaalke:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:Seattle could still mathematically get the #1 seed right? If they win, New Orleans loses and Green Bay goes 1-1 doesn't Seattle win that three way tiebreaker?
New Orleans would probably get it. And you don't want that. We took our chances down there once and won (barely). I don't want to go there twice. I don't want to go to Seattle either. Avoiding Seattle and New Orleans on the road is a great idea IMO.
At best Seattle can finish with the same record as the saints if everything goes right for them. And still saints get number 1 because they beat Seahawks during the season. Mathematically there is zero chance seahawks get number 1
No. If NO, GB, and Sea all finish 12-4, Seattle gets the #1 seed.
The Saints would be eliminated from the tiebreaker by conference record. That leaves GB vs. Sea.
Sea wins that tiebreak due to common games.
Did they play head to head? I thought head to head was the first tie breaker.
Yes, NO won. That is the tiebreaker. NO would get the tiebreaker.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:26 PM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Shawn Alexander may be ready too.
Hawks fans have no idea who that is I bet
LOL no you're right...only the 11 fans they had before 2012 know him
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:27 PM
- RTFirefly
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,262
Originally posted by CHAMBAZ:
Yes, NO won. That is the tiebreaker. NO would get the tiebreaker.
Not in a NO, GB, and Sea three-way tie at 12-4. Seattle wins that.
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:27 PM
- IGSXIII
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,348
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:Seahawks fans on Reddit are already mailing it in for the season.
Man they have no idea lol. I still believe they are our main obstacle. Both next week and in the playoffs if we meet up.
Saints are the main obstacle in the playoffs.
This
Dec 22, 2019 at 6:29 PM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by kelson49er:
Are you seriously calling a man "she" as an insult? Are you 12, and is it 1997 or something?
Pete Carroll is a joke, but you're worse. GTFO, idiot.
You mad?
Originally posted by Baylor:
Triggered
I'm guessing she's an undercover cawkSucker fan with secret emotions for cheat carroll