SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS vs GREEN BAY PACKERS - NFC Championship 2019 Season

Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:

Originally posted by Niners_D:

Matt Lafleur is a bright young coaching mind, but does he have what it takes to be a head coach? His comments were interesting, he blames the players lack of fire, he blames the coaching on the defensive side of the ball, but I don't see him taking any responsibility for his play-calling. A good tactician can be brilliant in the booth, but you have to also be a leader when you are the HC. I can't see this lasting long if it continues.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28538045/packers-coach-matt-lafleur-bothered-team-lack-fire-vs-49ers

Throwing around blame is not a recipe for longevity as a HC

74-28

"Gap between teams wasn't that big"
"They got us a couple times but it was close"

Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:

Originally posted by Niners_D:

Matt Lafleur is a bright young coaching mind, but does he have what it takes to be a head coach? His comments were interesting, he blames the players lack of fire, he blames the coaching on the defensive side of the ball, but I don't see him taking any responsibility for his play-calling. A good tactician can be brilliant in the booth, but you have to also be a leader when you are the HC. I can't see this lasting long if it continues.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28538045/packers-coach-matt-lafleur-bothered-team-lack-fire-vs-49ers

Throwing around blame is not a recipe for longevity as a HC

He wasn't blaming. A straight assessment of his teams performance. And put himself in it. Similar to what Kyle might've told Jed at his interview.

Originally posted by 49erminion:

74-28

"Gap between teams wasn't that big"
"They got us a couple times but it was close"

That was Rodgers take. Dude is delusional lol

Here's LaFleur's take:

LaFleur, however, took a different view when it came to the size of the gap.

"There obviously is [a gap]," LaFleur said. "I mean, we played them twice and they took it to us two times. So that's something that we've got to take a good, hard look at this offseason because right now they're the class of the NFC. They've shown it throughout the course of the season, and that is a really good football team. It was disappointing to go out there and get beat like that."

Originally posted by susweel:

Congrats guys we did it. We going to get #6.

Originally posted by 49erminion:

Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:

Originally posted by Niners_D:
Matt Lafleur is a bright young coaching mind, but does he have what it takes to be a head coach? His comments were interesting, he blames the players lack of fire, he blames the coaching on the defensive side of the ball, but I don't see him taking any responsibility for his play-calling. A good tactician can be brilliant in the booth, but you have to also be a leader when you are the HC. I can't see this lasting long if it continues.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28538045/packers-coach-matt-lafleur-bothered-team-lack-fire-vs-49ers

Throwing around blame is not a recipe for longevity as a HC

74-28

"Gap between teams wasn't that big"
"They got us a couple times but it was close"

if the niners play the packers 10 times, the niners win 10 times

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ImAlwaysRight:

Originally posted by braap49er:

I thought the stadium would of been louder... oh well

Game was over by halftime. Fans weren't needed to impact the game this time lol

joe buck did not think it was

Lmao I know this idiot the entire game trying to make it sound closer than it was 😂😂😂

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ImAlwaysRight:

Originally posted by braap49er:

I thought the stadium would of been louder... oh well

Game was over by halftime. Fans weren't needed to impact the game this time lol

joe buck did not think it was

Dreadful commentator. One of the worst imo.

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ImAlwaysRight:

Originally posted by braap49er:
I thought the stadium would of been louder... oh well

Game was over by halftime. Fans weren't needed to impact the game this time lol

joe buck did not think it was

Dreadful commentator. One of the worst imo.

pass is............

caught!

I know that I am in a minority, probably of one, but I don't mind Joe Buck. He's not my favourite by any measure, but I think he's good. He's especially good for baseball, but I like him for football as well. His notorious deadpan ("boring") delivery is positively vivacious compared to the likes of Summerall who's universally (and inexplicably for me) revered; and he's much better than the "excitable rabbit" types like Joe Tessitore. Is he Harry Kalas or Vin Scully? Of course not. He's not even the best of the current NFL lot , heck he's not even the best on Fox (who was the one who covered our game this year with the Saints? He's good). But he's not "dreadful".

I will agree that all commentators sometimes overdo it trying to hype up blowouts. But what do you expect? They need to keep bums on seats in front of the TV so that the Nielsens don't drop too much so as to annoy advertisers. All of them can be annoying at that. Al Michaels (who I also like a lot) does it all the time. It's annoying but inevitable.

Originally posted by paulk205:
I know that I am in a minority, probably of one, but I don't mind Joe Buck. He's not my favourite by any measure, but I think he's good. He's especially good for baseball, but I like him for football as well. His notorious deadpan ("boring") delivery is positively vivacious compared to the likes of Summerall who's universally (and inexplicably for me) revered; and he's much better than the "excitable rabbit" types like Joe Tessitore. Is he Harry Kalas or Vin Scully? Of course not. He's not even the best of the current NFL lot , heck he's not even the best on Fox (who was the one who covered our game this year with the Saints? He's good). But he's not "dreadful".

I will agree that all commentators sometimes overdo it trying to hype up blowouts. But what do you expect? They need to keep bums on seats in front of the TV so that the Nielsens don't drop too much so as to annoy advertisers. All of them can be annoying at that. Al Michaels (who I also like a lot) does it all the time. It's annoying but inevitable.

reported

But Seriously Folks (TM). You can't expect a national broadcaster to be as fun as the local radio one. Objectively though, or for the neutral (who's in the majority for national broadcasts), the local radio approach is never going to work. Even Kalas or Scully mentioned above mean more to Phillies and Dodgers fans respectively; and they both annoyed rival fanbases when they did national broadcasts.

Buck is allright. He has a decent baseline voice, has good chemistry with his color, and in my opinion strikes a very good balance of enthusiasm between the "Nudge him, he may be dead" Summerall and "Excitable rabbit on amphetamines" Tessitore types. He's good enough. And, as I said, I really like him for baseball, even if he's a Cardinals fan.

Check out ex-Niner QB savior JT O'Sullivan breaking down film on youtube!

Originally posted by D0PEMAN:

Check out ex-Niner QB savior JT O'Sullivan breaking down film on youtube!

nice watch, thnx for the link.

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by ImAlwaysRight:

Originally posted by braap49er:

I thought the stadium would of been louder... oh well

Game was over by halftime. Fans weren't needed to impact the game this time lol

joe buck did not think it was

Dreadful commentator. One of the worst imo.

After the Packers scored on their opening drive in the 2nd half, he said "...and is this the start of something big for the Packers..."

What a dope.

Originally posted by DrEll:

After the Packers scored on their opening drive in the 2nd half, he said "...and is this the start of something big for the Packers..."

What a dope.

what's wrong with that lol