Originally posted by 9moon:IMAGINE if we traded Breida and Pettis and a #3 to the Bengals for AJ GREEN...
Dude stop it.
There are 186 users in the forums
Brandon Aiyuk is a 49er! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft
Oct 1, 2020 at 7:32 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Dude stop it.
Oct 1, 2020 at 7:37 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by 49er_Football:He'd still be more useful than Pettis, he is actually someone who was once a top 5 WR in the league, and has a lot that the young receivers could learn from.
1st, why in the world would Cinci take Pettis/breida for AJ?
2nd, SF didn't have a 3rd last draft (traded for Sanders) and doesn't have one this yr (traded for Williams). They also weren't taking on AJ's $18M tag number this yr
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:19 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49er_Football:
He'd still be more useful than Pettis, he is actually someone who was once a top 5 WR in the league, and has a lot that the young receivers could learn from.
1st, why in the world would Cinci take Pettis/breida for AJ?
2nd, SF didn't have a 3rd last draft (traded for Sanders) and doesn't have one this yr (traded for Williams). They also weren't taking on AJ's $18M tag number this yr
why would anyone take pettis.. i used to think. like you 85,, we could ship him for jackson of green bay.. but now i think all we would get is a click on the other end if we would call them up to propose that trade
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:20 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by mayo49:special ed player in my opinion
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by 49er_Football:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49er_Football:
Imagine if we had Samuel, Sanders, Aiyuk, Kittle, Reed, Mostert, McKinnon, and Juice here in San Francisco. Sanders wouldn't have to deal with 5 yard passes every play!
IMAGINE if we traded Breida and Pettis and a #3 to the Bengals for AJ GREEN...
What's your fascination with Green anymore lol? He's a shell of his former self and he's lost any speed that he once had.
He'd still be more useful than Pettis, he is actually someone who was once a top 5 WR in the league, and has a lot that the young receivers could learn from.
Anyone is more useful than Pettis but that doesn't mean we should be sending good draft capital for him.
Pettis is basically a ST player at this point.
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:21 AM
- CatchMaster80
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,263
Originally posted by NYniner85:
1st, why in the world would Cinci take Pettis/breida for AJ?
2nd, SF didn't have a 3rd last draft (traded for Sanders) and doesn't have one this yr (traded for Williams). They also weren't taking on AJ's $18M tag number this yr
Thank you. I love it when fans want to trade guys that can't produce for us for a player that has or is producing at a fairly high level. Like every other team is willing to take our castoffs and give u a good player.
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:the world of some fans here overvaluing our players and in the case of pettis. to a RIDICULOUS level
Originally posted by NYniner85:
1st, why in the world would Cinci take Pettis/breida for AJ?
2nd, SF didn't have a 3rd last draft (traded for Sanders) and doesn't have one this yr (traded for Williams). They also weren't taking on AJ's $18M tag number this yr
Thank you. I love it when fans want to trade guys that can't produce for us for a player that has or is producing at a fairly high level. Like every other team is willing to take our castoffs and give u a good player.
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:27 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by cciowa:why would anyone take pettis.. i used to think. like you 85,, we could ship him for jackson of green bay.. but now i think all we would get is a click on the other end if we would call them up to propose that trade
Joshua jackson has played in 7 defensive snaps so far this yr...he's literally a backup DB who plays STs same as Pettis depth player who plays ST.
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:32 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by NYniner85:i still think they would want more. lol.. but yes.. that trade makes sense for both teams. of course i thought jenkins for jon baldwin made sense and i thought baldwin would take off for us
Originally posted by cciowa:
why would anyone take pettis.. i used to think. like you 85,, we could ship him for jackson of green bay.. but now i think all we would get is a click on the other end if we would call them up to propose that trade
Joshua jackson has played in 7 defensive snaps so far this yr...he's literally a backup DB who plays STs same as Pettis depth player who plays ST.
Oct 1, 2020 at 9:11 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by cciowa:i still think they would want more. lol.. but yes.. that trade makes sense for both teams. of course i thought jenkins for jon baldwin made sense and i thought baldwin would take off for us
And I bet packers fans would say I bet SF would want more lol
I mean these sort of trades don't really change much of anything most of the time...highly doubt it ever happens.
Oct 1, 2020 at 9:31 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by NYniner85:other than just teams removing their respective trash. i guess there is always the good old tried and true....... change of scenery theory
Originally posted by cciowa:
i still think they would want more. lol.. but yes.. that trade makes sense for both teams. of course i thought jenkins for jon baldwin made sense and i thought baldwin would take off for us
And I bet packers fans would say I bet SF would want more lol
I mean these sort of trades don't really change much of anything most of the time...highly doubt it ever happens.
Oct 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by cciowa:other than just teams removing their respective trash. i guess there is always the good old tried and true....... change of scenery theory
Yup
Oct 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM
- mitpdub
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,282
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by cciowa:other than just teams removing their respective trash. i guess there is always the good old tried and true....... change of scenery theory
Yup
I would trade him for a special teams 'ace'. Our special teams have been our weakest link this season, other than kickoff coverage.
[ Edited by mitpdub on Oct 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM ]
Oct 1, 2020 at 10:02 AM
- NinerTy
- Veteran
- Posts: 713
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by NYniner85:1st, why in the world would Cinci take Pettis/breida for AJ?
2nd, SF didn't have a 3rd last draft (traded for Sanders) and doesn't have one this yr (traded for Williams). They also weren't taking on AJ's $18M tag number this yr
Does anyone recall Tim Brown coming out of Notre Dame to the Raiders? He was trash for a few years. Then all of a sudden he broke out and became a Hall of Famer
Oct 1, 2020 at 10:47 AM
- Sickaa
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,813
Originally posted by cciowa:other than just teams removing their respective trash. i guess there is always the good old tried and true....... change of scenery theoryOriginally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by cciowa:i still think they would want more. lol.. but yes.. that trade makes sense for both teams. of course i thought jenkins for jon baldwin made sense and i thought baldwin would take off for us
And I bet packers fans would say I bet SF would want more lol
I mean these sort of trades don't really change much of anything most of the time...highly doubt it ever happens.
Yep, abit like when we traded AJ Jenkins for that other receiver from the chiefs. One scrub for another, so to speak.
[ Edited by Sickaa on Oct 1, 2020 at 12:17 PM ]
Oct 1, 2020 at 10:58 AM
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by Sickaa:and as i said in the above. cc was ready to crown baldwin as the missing piece of the puzzle
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NYniner85:other than just teams removing their respective trash. i guess there is always the good old tried and true....... change of scenery theory
Originally posted by cciowa:
i still think they would want more. lol.. but yes.. that trade makes sense for both teams. of course i thought jenkins for jon baldwin made sense and i thought baldwin would take off for us
And I bet packers fans would say I bet SF would want more lol
I mean these sort of trades don't really change much of anything most of the time...highly doubt it ever happens.
Yep, about like when we traded AJ Jenkins for that other receiver from the chiefs. One scrub for another, so to speak.
