Brandon Aiyuk is a 49er! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

Originally posted by ninersrule4:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Izyniner:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
Doesn't work that way, B.A can veto a trade simply by refusing to sign a long term deal with the "loser" team we want to trade him to. If we tell he and his agent to go find a trade of their liking and he chooses the Chiefs, now what????

We can act like B.A is a Camaro or a sub-par player, but remember we don't even get to the Super Bowl without him. The responses on this board proves this if we think he is good enough to be traded for a high 1st round pick or a future H.O.F'er straight up.

What we need to do is sign him.

And who diminished him? I said he's top 5 by virtue of him being All Pro but what I'm saying is on this team we have mouths to feed and the meal is great but if he doesn't fork over a bit of money he's going to have to dine elsewhere like anyone else

We cant keep winning then pay all 53 more than everyone else. This ain't the Eddie days. We have to have some players willing to take the Tom Brady route and if not we will make the best moves for self just as we did with Deforest Buckner

And how did that work out for us?

Yeah we haven't made the playoffs since

Making the playoffs is not the goal. we are not the Jacksonville Jaguars.

We are the 5 time Super Bowl Champion 49ers.

I know some people think we are the 0-3 Santa Clara 49ers, but that's not true. We have standards that a lot of the new faithful might not understand.

Uh you can't get to the Super Bowl without first getting to the playoffs. Kinda how this whole thing works!

You didn't mention the Super Bowl

your standard was simply making it to the playoffs

People on here act like we've won 3 SBs with Lynch and Kyle. Like the team is perfect and wins all the time.

This was the first season under them we had a legit QB the whole season and we had the lead in the SB every time that QB saw the field in the 4th quarter and in OT.

Perfect teams don't always win SBs. Look at the 2007 Pats who were literally perfect going into their big game. Ironically enough they were stopped by the same DC who has handed us two losses under Kyle but I'd put good money on if Feliciano doesn't get injured Spags and Reid are taking an L in that game. That doesn't even bring up Dre's injury and how it opened up the Chiefs offense - what a brilliant coaching move by Andy Reid btw to have Greenlaw's Achilles pop.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

If Aiyuk has a subpar year this season after reporting late to camp I don't want to hear him make excuses that he missed too much prep time and wasn't in shape.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

He was definitely open in the back of the end zone on that one fateful play when our backup o-lineman missed his assignment sealing our fate.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
If Aiyuk has a subpar year this season after reporting late to camp I don't want to hear him make excuses that he missed too much prep time and wasn't in shape.

Then if he ain't signed his value will slump and the money he's been holding out for will decline. If a team is offering 90% of what you want and can afford you a winning situation then it may be a good idea to sign prior to the season beginning

Especially when said team is trying to reward you earlier than they have to

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
If Aiyuk has a subpar year this season after reporting late to camp I don't want to hear him make excuses that he missed too much prep time and wasn't in shape.

Then if he ain't signed his value will slump and the money he's been holding out for will decline. If a team is offering 90% of what you want and can afford you a winning situation then it may be a good idea to sign prior to the season beginning

Especially when said team is trying to reward you earlier than they have to

All true. The difference in money is really about half when you consider taxes take almost 50% in that range. I could understand these holdouts and demands if the difference was really huge but holding out for 2 or 3 million more is silly. He's going to be a wealthy man the rest of his life in either case. If he takes less and wins a SB title that will be something he can't put a price tag on. He'll be talking about that when he's in his 60s and the money won't even be an issue.

Originally posted by 49erKing:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

He was definitely open in the back of the end zone on that one fateful play when our backup o-lineman missed his assignment sealing our fate.

Burford sucks and should not be a starter. Feliciano is much better. He's a veteran starter. While maybe not great. He's at least a solid veteran starter. Light years better than that scrub. I can't believe people don't see it.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

If we had better line play Brock would have had time to find Ayuik and he would have been open more. Since that is not the belief of the FO, Kyle and Lynch, It's a moot point. We better pray for a miracle that Puni is great in his rookie year or it's groundhog day all over again.

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

If we had better line play Brock would have had time to find Ayuik and he would have been open more. Since that is not the belief of the FO, Kyle and Lynch, It's a moot point. We better pray for a miracle that Puni is great in his rookie year or it's groundhog day all over again.

Yeah the line is a big problem and a huge part of that. I agree with that.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

Lol that's a fact huh?

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

If we had better line play Brock would have had time to find Ayuik and he would have been open more. Since that is not the belief of the FO, Kyle and Lynch, It's a moot point. We better pray for a miracle that Puni is great in his rookie year or it's groundhog day all over again.

Yeah the line is a big problem and a huge part of that. I agree with that.

So better OL play would allow Ayiuk to suddenly beat man coverage, which you stated he didn't and couldn't ever do in the SB?

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Pay the man. After the SB everybody was crying about not having wrs that can best man coverage. Now we all think losing the only one we have won't make a difference at all. Gotta love the webzone. And if they don't wanna pay him then they should've traded him. Him sitting out and coming in late helps nobody.

He didn't beat man coverage in the Super Bowl. He was covered like a BLANKET by elite Chiefs CB's. Regular season tiger. Didn't hold up against the elites. Plus DeeVAH limping around with his hamstring problems in the Super Bowl. Both failed us.

You still running your mouth when you're clearly wrong? Shocking…

He was totally covered in the Super Bowl. While Samuel was limping around.

lol Stop making s**t up . Been showed to you ad nauseam

He was NOT open out there on a lot of plays. You can find a one off. Or a few. But he was strongly covered in that game by the elite Chiefs CB's for the most part. He was less effective than normal for the whole season. That's a fact.

If we had better line play Brock would have had time to find Ayuik and he would have been open more. Since that is not the belief of the FO, Kyle and Lynch, It's a moot point. We better pray for a miracle that Puni is great in his rookie year or it's groundhog day all over again.

Yeah the line is a big problem and a huge part of that. I agree with that.

So better OL play would allow Ayiuk to suddenly beat man coverage, which you stated he didn't and couldn't ever do in the SB?

It would allow more time for Ayuik to get open. Even if there is elite CBs Ayuik with time will get open. Also Purdy time to process when Ayuik is open.