Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by libertyforever:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I love ya NC, but c'mon man, they just got the 2nd best DT and a 7 time pro bowl LT, and getting WIrfs would be redundant IMO, he's a RT and RG, we're fine at those, Brunskill is a good player, they know more than we do, people always overreact, no need to do this. We have a great OL IMO, and Kinlaw is a better DT than Taylor or any of the other IDL we have, so I'm happy with this draft/offseason.
If you think an AAF talent in Brunskill is in the same talent level as Wirfs, I'm going to have to slightly disagree with you. Wirfs also gives you the added benefit of keeping top talent at T should McGlinchey go down (he goes down every year with injury).
What does AAF have to do with anything?
Talent level.
Referencing AAF just seems to be a way to try and denigrate the guy. Not all good players are division 1 1st round picks....not even kind of. He proved last year he could play at a high level, so him coming from AAF means absolutely nothing .
Niners just drafted an OT in 5th btw. Not too familiar with him.
We should have drafted a number 1 TE with our 1st round pick. George Kittle is only a 5th round talent.
You are aware there are all levels of talent. Just because he dons a 49er uniform does not mean he has supreme talent. Teams maximize supreme talent to give themselves the best chance to win. Comparing a top 10 talent to Daniel Brunskill is comical...not meant to degrade the player himself. Hard work and dedication will take you far. And he's earned the right to compete against top talent like Wirfs.
Sorry but the only one comparing Brunskill to a top 10 talent is you.