There are 268 users in the forums
Niners draft Colton McKivitz | OT West Virginia
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,763
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,638
- NFL Pick 'em
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,193
Originally posted by NYniner85:
2 years, $5.8m for Colton McKivitz per his agency. That's $2.9m APY — or significantly less than the $4.3m second-round tender, as I wrote yesterday.
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) March 10, 2023
49ers managed to obtain a significant discount. Should enable them to continue boosting O-line. McKivitz will compete for RT job
Zero complaints about that deal. That's a pretty damn good contract; especially if he ends up our starter. Much better than what MM will be getting and MM isn't significantly better IMO
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,638
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
2 years, $5.8m for Colton McKivitz per his agency. That's $2.9m APY — or significantly less than the $4.3m second-round tender, as I wrote yesterday.
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) March 10, 2023
49ers managed to obtain a significant discount. Should enable them to continue boosting O-line. McKivitz will compete for RT job
Zero complaints about that deal. That's a pretty damn good contract; especially if he ends up our starter. Much better than what MM will be getting and MM isn't significantly better IMO
SALUTE to that deal !!! in 2 years, if or when he becomes a LEGIT starting RT in the league, then he can make his $$$
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,454
And who knows - MCK might end up being very effective in the KS system.
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
we all think they will/should take a OT with one of those 3rds, don't me shocked if they don't.
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Wild that Lynch said they were talking about moving McG last yr…that would mean they were good with Colton at RT heading into the season.
we all think they will/should take a OT with one of those 3rds, don't me shocked if they don't.
Except they cut him so that and this low swing T contract type contract kind of speaks to how they really feel about him, IMHO. Another guy who ended up on I.R. too. I'm not understanding all the faith in this guy at all. Lower end talent.
They better!
But to your point, the MM example is encouraging to me. Each off season, I try to think a year or two out like they do. That's why the Aiyuk trade talk was not surprising to me at all.
- jdt84_2
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,554
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by NCommand:Even if McKivits is their starter and long term expectation
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Wild that Lynch said they were talking about moving McG last yr…that would mean they were good with Colton at RT heading into the season.
we all think they will/should take a OT with one of those 3rds, don't me shocked if they don't.
Except they cut him so that and this low swing T contract type contract kind of speaks to how they really feel about him, IMHO. Another guy who ended up on I.R. too. I'm not understanding all the faith in this guy at all. Lower end talent.
They better!
But to your point, the MM example is encouraging to me. Each off season, I try to think a year or two out like they do. That's why the Aiyuk trade talk was not surprising to me at all.
I still think they will look at a raw athletic talent day 3 to replace Trent Williams in 2 years.IIf Trent stays great, if he retires you are hopefully ready.
it is why Darnell Washington is so intriguing to me. If he performs at TE, that is a win, if he doesn't he can maybe make the transition to OT by the end of his rookie contract.
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
Originally posted by NCommand:Even if McKivits is their starter and long term expectation
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Wild that Lynch said they were talking about moving McG last yr…that would mean they were good with Colton at RT heading into the season.
we all think they will/should take a OT with one of those 3rds, don't me shocked if they don't.
Except they cut him so that and this low swing T contract type contract kind of speaks to how they really feel about him, IMHO. Another guy who ended up on I.R. too. I'm not understanding all the faith in this guy at all. Lower end talent.
They better!
But to your point, the MM example is encouraging to me. Each off season, I try to think a year or two out like they do. That's why the Aiyuk trade talk was not surprising to me at all.
I still think they will look at a raw athletic talent day 3 to replace Trent Williams in 2 years.IIf Trent stays great, if he retires you are hopefully ready.
it is why Darnell Washington is so intriguing to me. If he performs at TE, that is a win, if he doesn't he can maybe make the transition to OT by the end of his rookie contract.
Funny you say that. Both MM and DL noted to keep an eye on T Leroy Watson. He's a former TE who converted to T and both said he looks pretty natural.
- jdt84_2
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,554
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by NCommand:
Funny you say that. Both MM and DL noted to keep an eye on T Leroy Watson. He's a former TE who converted to T and both said he looks pretty natural.
It makes sense, it is probably easier to find big TEs who can move with technique than it is OL.
Also less likely to end up with the weight gain issues some OL have.
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Funny you say that. Both MM and DL noted to keep an eye on T Leroy Watson. He's a former TE who converted to T and both said he looks pretty natural.
It makes sense, it is probably easier to find big TEs who can move with technique than it is OL.
Also less likely to end up with the weight gain issues some OL have.
Very true esp. if they also played basketball.
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by NCommand:
Except they cut him so that and this low swing T contract type contract kind of speaks to how they really feel about him, IMHO. Another guy who ended up on I.R. too. I'm not understanding all the faith in this guy at all. Lower end talent.
They better!
But to your point, the MM example is encouraging to me. Each off season, I try to think a year or two out like they do. That's why the Aiyuk trade talk was not surprising to me at all.
I mean if they were gonna move McG (which they said they were actively trying to do) who's the starting RT last yr?
who cares about his contract…why would you overpay him, when his market was not even remotely close to do that?
All I'm saying right or wrong, I bet they like him a whole hell of a lot more than people in here do.
So what low level talent only applies to OL and every other position outside of QB? Cause people been telling me overall talent level doesn't matter there lol.
also I'm with you they better draft some lineman
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,320
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Except they cut him so that and this low swing T contract type contract kind of speaks to how they really feel about him, IMHO. Another guy who ended up on I.R. too. I'm not understanding all the faith in this guy at all. Lower end talent.
They better!
But to your point, the MM example is encouraging to me. Each off season, I try to think a year or two out like they do. That's why the Aiyuk trade talk was not surprising to me at all.
I mean if they were gonna move McG (which they said they were actively trying to do) who's the starting RT last yr?
who cares about his contract…why would you overpay him, when his market was not even remotely close to do that?
All I'm saying right or wrong, I bet they like him a whole hell of a lot more than people in here do.
So what low level talent only applies to OL and every other position outside of QB? Cause people been telling me overall talent level doesn't matter there lol.
also I'm with you they better draft some lineman
Draft is hours away, NY.
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
Originally posted by mayo49:
Draft is hours away, NY.
Late Friday for us
- AB81Rules
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,125
Originally posted by 9moon:
YES... He needs to start at the RT position during OTA so that he can get some reps and see what he's made of.
I actually agree with something Moon says, and did we just become best friends ?
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
2 years, $5.8m for Colton McKivitz per his agency. That's $2.9m APY — or significantly less than the $4.3m second-round tender, as I wrote yesterday.
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) March 10, 2023
49ers managed to obtain a significant discount. Should enable them to continue boosting O-line. McKivitz will compete for RT job
Zero complaints about that deal. That's a pretty damn good contract; especially if he ends up our starter. Much better than what MM will be getting and MM isn't significantly better IMO
SALUTE to that deal !!! in 2 years, if or when he becomes a LEGIT starting RT in the league, then he can make his $$$
And we get a 3rd rd comp pick