Originally posted by NYniner85:
I mean is Kittle more valuable than our QB? Sounds like some people are actually debating that...guess we should pay him more the JG too then lol.
AA's position is worth more and you won't find a single GM that would disagree.
When you totally disregard positional value when it comes to money, why the f**k shouldn't other players that play another positions ask for a ton more??
Why shouldn't TW ask for 50% more than the highest LT in football, if Kittle got it? Why shouldn't Warner ask for 50% more than the highest LBer? Why shouldn't Bosa/McG/Deebo ask for 50% more then the highest paid player at their position when it's their turn?
Kittle should absolutely crush the TE market...if he wants Julio Jones type money made he should have play WR? If we're talking about DE money, maybe he should play DE
While waiting to figure out what to say, ''because we just can't NOT pay Kittle," you gave us all something to think on. For one or two guys....ok..., paying Kittle $15, maybe $17 mil per, in short order we have Warner, Nick, Trent, Deebo, McG....and on and on. Obviously it can't be done. So nice post NY and for those of us who want to see George get paid, it will happen. But just not at the budget busting numbers that have been kicked around. On top of all this, the cap for next yr, based on this yr's income, is a tad shaky, to say the least. If the total NFL income this yr is markedly decreased, well, the cap will be similarly affected also. So that is yet another joker that will have a definite effect on paying Kittle. One almost could think this might just be a good yr NOT to re-up George.