Originally posted by MannySoopa49ersnMD:Feels like the run game was pretty lackluster this week...even down to the type of runs...i know Mostert is faster than everyone but I didnt see his kinds of run plays called at all.
Agreed
There are 365 users in the forums
Originally posted by MannySoopa49ersnMD:Feels like the run game was pretty lackluster this week...even down to the type of runs...i know Mostert is faster than everyone but I didnt see his kinds of run plays called at all.
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:People need to accept that without boss we aren't winning any games 17-14 or less. We will have to put up near 30 pts a game to win consistently.
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
Early on I thought Jet was trying to force a couple of those runs to the edge. Nerves, rust, or too amped up, can't blame him too much. Been a long time since he had a start.
Salah really needs to figure out a solution for running qb's. We allowed Daniel jones to look dual threat today
Originally posted by RasSuar:Salah really needs to figure out a solution for running qb's. We allowed Daniel jones to look dual threat today
We need to run that 3-3-5 defense I've been talking about. Lions used it a bit against Kyler Murray in the Detroit win today.
Originally posted by mattster03:
This is starting to not sound crazy
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by taney71:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:Originally posted by Thanos89:All right so which team can we get to trade for Mullens?
More like who can we trade Jimmy to so we can sign Trent Williams long term.
Jimmy is currently middle of the pack for highest paid QB. His contract was front loaded. If you're going to troll, at least know the basics.
Yeah, but dumping $27 million a year in salary would mean we could pick up a few other contracts. I don't recommend doing it as I don't think Mullens is a starting QB (not yet at least) but let's remember that Jimmy is being paid a lot.
NFL QB's make big, big money. Doesn't matter who you have. The top backups in this league make 8-12 mil. You aren't going to find a starting QB who you can win with for under 20-25 mil a year. Thats not salary you can sacrifice for other positions. You never "save" money on the QB position.
The only time you get top tier QB play for cheap is if you draft a star. Then you get 3-4 years of dirt cheap QB before you have to pay up.
Moving Garoppolo to save money is one of the dumbest ideas ive ever heard.
What?
Not saying we should do it, but how much do you think it would cost to sign Mullens for another three years as a "potential starter" if we cut Jimmy and draft a QB?
Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by MannySoopa49ersnMD:Feels like the run game was pretty lackluster this week...even down to the type of runs...i know Mostert is faster than everyone but I didnt see his kinds of run plays called at all.
Agreed
Originally posted by Niners99:The lowest paid starting QB who isnt on a rookie contract is Teddy Bridgewater at 21 million per year. Why would Nick Mullens accept less than that to become a starter on a new deal? That would only save us 6 mil. Why would going with a backup with a very limited sample size over a guy you went to the SB with be a good idea? To save 6 mil? Makes no sense.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Mullen is a RFA next yr, he will be STARTING in SF.
Originally posted by ChicoCorrales:Originally posted by NYniner85:Mullen is a RFA next yr, he will be STARTING in SF.
FTFY
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Niners99:
The lowest paid starting QB who isnt on a rookie contract is Teddy Bridgewater at 21 million per year. Why would Nick Mullens accept less than that to become a starter on a new deal? That would only save us 6 mil. Why would going with a backup with a very limited sample size over a guy you went to the SB with be a good idea? To save 6 mil? Makes no sense.
Mullen is a RFA next yr, he will be in SF.