Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
I apologize that my words were harsh. But the simple fact is, you are manipulating the spirit of the question in order to give the answer you are giving.
"Manipulating the spirit of the question"? You're the only one saying this about my response. Stop trying to tell me that I'm jumping through hoops to justify my answer, because it's simply not the case. I was as clear as I could be just saying that in my opinion, Alex was
always a higher caliber player than I felt some were willing to give him credit for. Even the fact that he was winning, albeit ugly, with that turd team in Washington before he got hurt I thought was telling to at least some extent.
I have no problem admitting Kaepernick had plenty of positives, but I had concerns that eventually came to fruition before my own eyes. His struggles on short throws, struggles in calibrating velocity and ball trajectory, pre-snap reads/audibles, horrendous vision at times seeing guys open all over the field (this was a massive issue that pissed off many fans), and holding the ball too long eventually reared their ugly head.
None of this is said to absolve Smith of his own flaws, which have already been discuss ad nauseam. At the end of the day, I weighed the flaws and strengths of each player, and made my choice. I am not going to laugh at anyone's choice or mock anyone for thinking differently. It's okay to disagree, but it's not okay to backhandedly insult other's intelligence and integrity.