Trading up to #2 | Page 2 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Apr 4, 2021 at 10:02 AM

sacniner
Member
Posts: 31,684

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

[ Edited by sacniner on Apr 4, 2021 at 10:32 AM ]

Apr 4, 2021 at 11:46 AM

#17

rorrim
Veteran
Posts: 302

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
Trade up to 2 then draft...

Mac Jones

this

Apr 4, 2021 at 11:57 AM

#18

English
Moderator
Posts: 40,419
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by rorrim:

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
Trade up to 2 then draft...

Mac Jones

this

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:08 PM

#19

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

You don't know that - maybe they changed their mind and went with Fields instead.

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:27 PM

#20

dj43
Moderator
Posts: 36,268
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

You don't know that - maybe they changed their mind and went with Fields instead.

The longer this scene plays out, the more obvious it becomes that there is a significant gap between Lawrence/Wilson and the next three. Greg Cosell, among others, noted in the video linked on the home page.

It was pretty clear that the Jets were not interested before the first trade. Unlikely they would be now.

[ Edited by dj43 on Apr 4, 2021 at 12:42 PM ]

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:37 PM

#21

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

Throw in jimmie ward and that deal gets done.

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:38 PM

#22

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

You don't know that - maybe they changed their mind and went with Fields instead.

The longer this scene plays out, the more obvious it becomes that there is a significant gap between Lawrence/Wilson and the next three. Greg Cosell, among others, not that in the video linked on the home page.

It was pretty clear that the Jets were not interested before the first trade. Unlikely they would be now.

I say give them Warner - that should get it done.

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:48 PM

#23

Ottawa49er
Veteran
Posts: 512

Originally posted by mayo49:
I say give them Warner - that should get it done.

Ahh, NO. We should definitely NOT give up a proven star on defense to move up on spot and draft someone who has yet to play a single down in the NFL. Just NO !!!

Apr 4, 2021 at 12:49 PM

#24

Ottawa49er
Veteran
Posts: 512

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

You don't know that - maybe they changed their mind and went with Fields instead.

So if that is the case, we would be smart staying at #3, and selecting Wilson then?

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:03 PM

#25

brodiebluebanaszak
Veteran
Posts: 14,387

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
What did the bears give up to move from 3 to 2 get trus**tty. Now it's our turn to get swindled.

Jimmy and our 3 for darnold and their two

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:05 PM

#26

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by Ottawa49er:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

You made a thread for this, and this was the opening post? Jfc

Moving up from #3 to #2 is a gigantic move that takes a lot of capital. The Jets probably see their next decade of prosperity in Wilson.

/thread

You don't know that - maybe they changed their mind and went with Fields instead.

So if that is the case, we would be smart staying at #3, and selecting Wilson then?

How ever it happens - I just want Wilson.

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:20 PM

#27

GoldandGarnet
Veteran
Posts: 1,864

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

Well, check this out. I was a big damn idiot in the "49ers trade for #3 overall" for propping the same thing.

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:22 PM

#28

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by GoldandGarnet:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Something can still materialize with the Jets. We're so close to #2 - a 2nd or 3rd round pick may get it done.

Well, check this out. I was a big damn idiot in the "49ers trade for #3 overall" for propping the same thing.

Your not an idiot - just thinking outside the box.

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:30 PM

#29

Bluesbro
Veteran
Posts: 13,246

Originally posted by dj43:
The longer this scene plays out, the more obvious it becomes that there is a significant gap between Lawrence/Wilson and the next three. Greg Cosell, among others, noted in the video linked on the home page.

It was pretty clear that the Jets were not interested before the first trade. Unlikely they would be now.

Lawrence is the only one with the gap for sure. I don't agree with Wilson being any better than the others, at least as a sure thing before seeing him in the NFL. I think the 9ers want Lance anyway so a trade up is unnecessary. Unless the Jets take Lance.

Apr 4, 2021 at 1:35 PM

#30

Phoenix49ers
Moderator
Posts: 123,066

Originally posted by mayo49:
Why, don't you want Wilson better than the other three?

What guarantee is there that Wilson will be a better NFL quarterback? I like Wilson, but I also don't see some huge gap between him and Fields. There's a lot of reasons why a team might prefer Fields to Wilson