Originally posted by JTB1974:
I find it funny people are like "How are we suppose to beat Seattle" As if they are automatically some great team. They are 1-2 who just lost by 13 points to a team who is worse than the Packers. Is Wilson better than Rodgers? Probally not. Is their Oline better? I wouldn't say so. Is their RB better? Carson is not better than Jones. Is their receivers better? As a whole group, Yes. But Adams is better than both DK and Lockett. Tonya is maybe even abit better than Everett. Now defensively the Packers have a much better secondary than the Seahawks. Seahawks have much better Linebackers and better safety. Dline is not a big gap either way. Right now can we say the Seahawks are a better team than the Packers?
Lol Seahawks have multiple good WRs and a mobile QB. We couldn't defend ONE wr and I don't recall Rodgers having to move much despite playing with a 4th string LT and other bum linemen against our supposedly great DL. Rodgers was hit TWO times all game. 2.
So are the Seahawks better than the packers? I don't know. But I guarantee we aren't putting up more than 24 points with this junk offense. The question is do you think an elite QB with 2 great WRs can put up more than 24 points on our 5th/6th strong CBs? You know the answer