Originally posted by onetrackt:
How can they honestly look at Ryans and not fire him during the bye week
This post did not age well.
Poster full of so many trash takes.
There are 279 users in the forums
Originally posted by onetrackt:
How can they honestly look at Ryans and not fire him during the bye week
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
The 49ers' offense in weeks 2, 3, and the first half of week 4 with Garoppolo: 4.84 yards per play
— Dieter Kurtenbach (@dieter) October 10, 2021
Last six quarters with Lance at QB: 6.12 yards per play
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
The 49ers' offense in weeks 2, 3, and the first half of week 4 with Garoppolo: 4.84 yards per play
— Dieter Kurtenbach (@dieter) October 10, 2021
Last six quarters with Lance at QB: 6.12 yards per play
Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if we win this game with Kittle.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Wanting and Needing are 2 different things.
Lance f**king left on it all the field, kid wants to win and no one came deny that.
like others said the game doesn't look to big for him, he needs more reps more time being the starter…this team goes for Jimmy to Lance and it's two totally different styles of play.
Originally posted by NCommand:
I've probably been in the minority with this take as well. I never bought into the narrative that if he balls out today, he'll keep the job. Eric Davis talked about this as well saying that once they go to Trey, it signals the season is over to all veteran players, many on one year contracts. What you're saying is you are now preparing for a future, using the present to prepare for that, and many of the players won't be here for that future. They are here today and they want to win now. They don't have 6 year contracts. It also signals you're giving up on the season way early when there's still a full season to go.
I don't think it matters how he plays today. It's just film for Kyle and Trey to build on as Kyle gets him more ready for the future and learns himself, what Trey-specific plays were effective, which weren't, what he was comfortable with not, etc.
Again, once Kyle feels he can run the 85% more and be effectively consistent on 3rd downs, he'll be ready. That's unlikely at this early stage.
Originally posted by taney71:Drives would have ended much sooner with Jimmy. I dont believe he would have done much more.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Jimmy would have gotten sacked like 10 times in this game. Trey Lance using his legs bailed him out and I cant believe we are going back to Garoppolo
Defense only giving up 17 we would have won with Jimmy.
Perhaps but I would play Lance. Over time that's the smarter move.
Jimmy Garoppolo was awful and got injured the past two times he faced the terrible Seahawks defense. What was he really going to do against Arizona?
— Grant Cohn (@grantcohn) October 11, 2021
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
The 49ers' offense in weeks 2, 3, and the first half of week 4 with Garoppolo: 4.84 yards per play
— Dieter Kurtenbach (@dieter) October 10, 2021
Last six quarters with Lance at QB: 6.12 yards per play
Why didn't he include week 1?
Originally posted by badguy_1:
Jimmy Garoppolo was awful and got injured the past two times he faced the terrible Seahawks defense. What was he really going to do against Arizona?
— Grant Cohn (@grantcohn) October 11, 2021
100% truth. Especially with Kittle missing
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Originally posted by taney71:Drives would have ended much sooner with Jimmy. I dont believe he would have done much more.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Jimmy would have gotten sacked like 10 times in this game. Trey Lance using his legs bailed him out and I cant believe we are going back to Garoppolo
Defense only giving up 17 we would have won with Jimmy.
Perhaps but I would play Lance. Over time that's the smarter move.
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Just lead 3 straight games of 7 pts 1st half…sounds like a $100M QB to me
You have a dilemma. You love Lance and want him played now, but your lord and savior Kyle is adamant on sticking with Jimmy. How do you reconcile this.
Would be stupid to stick with Trey with a healthy Jimmy G.
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Originally posted by taney71:Drives would have ended much sooner with Jimmy. I dont believe he would have done much more.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Jimmy would have gotten sacked like 10 times in this game. Trey Lance using his legs bailed him out and I cant believe we are going back to Garoppolo
Defense only giving up 17 we would have won with Jimmy.
Perhaps but I would play Lance. Over time that's the smarter move.
There were a couple of drives that trey extended in ways Jimmy simply couldn't. At the same time Jimmy is more efficient over the middle and may not have need those types of plays to get the first down.
Overall I don't think Jimmy v Trey is a case of this one's not better than the other by a large margin. To me they're both different shades of limitations. Difference is, Jimmy is what Jimmy is, we don't know what Trey will be yet. Long term we're better off with Trey.
Having said that, if today is an example of how we're going to play Trey then I'm not keen on seeing that for another 12 weeks. If Trey is too raw to run a proper offense or be trusted to pass then I'd rather he sit than take that sort of punishment week in and week out.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
If that was Lance's floor then I'm excited to see what he can become….Rome wasn't built in a day