Originally posted by goldlame2013:
The answer is obvious. As long as you are in playoff contention, you start Jimmy, no ifs, ands, or buts. If out of playoff contention, play Trey.
100%
There are 289 users in the forums
Originally posted by goldlame2013:
The answer is obvious. As long as you are in playoff contention, you start Jimmy, no ifs, ands, or buts. If out of playoff contention, play Trey.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Better than Trey who just looks a lost puppy. Jimmy hasn't been "bad" but hardly good so far
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Better than Trey who just looks a lost puppy. Jimmy hasn't been "bad" but hardly good so far
So glad our $125 million multi year vet with multiple seasons in the same system can manage to muster up a "not bad but not good" performance so far.
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Better than Trey who just looks a lost puppy. Jimmy hasn't been "bad" but hardly good so far
So glad our $125 million multi year vet with multiple seasons in the same system can manage to muster up a "not bad but not good" performance so far.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Better than Trey who just looks a lost puppy. Jimmy hasn't been "bad" but hardly good so far
So glad our $125 million multi year vet with multiple seasons in the same system can manage to muster up a "not bad but not good" performance so far.
Jimmy struggled to move the ball against Seattle at home but people think he would have won in Arizona without Kittle.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Whichever side you're on in the Great Jimmy Debate, it's safe to say he won't be remembered in 49er lore as one of the greats.
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by socal1632:
If he starts James again it's because he was told winning record/playoffs this year or he's fired
I thought winning records/playoffs was the whole point of sports. Can't believe people would welcome tanking a season if it meant developing one player. What portion of the fanbase is in a "cult" again?
Some believe we can win with Trey as much as we can win with Jimmy.
Imo they win in AZ with Jimmy and Kittle. Trey looked bad
IMO they win in AZ with Trey and Kittle. Jimmy has looked bad.
Better than Trey who just looks a lost puppy. Jimmy hasn't been "bad" but hardly good so far
So glad our $125 million multi year vet with multiple seasons in the same system can manage to muster up a "not bad but not good" performance so far.
Jimmy struggled to move the ball against Seattle at home but people think he would have won in Arizona without Kittle.
No he DIDNT lol. He did fine moving the ball, it was getting it in the endzone that was the problem.
Originally posted by Rascal:
Start Jimmy of course and do what has always been done on rookie QBs with Lance, that is to give him time to develop. Just because you throw him in the fire now, it doesn't necessarily mean he will be ready sooner, in fact it could have the opposite effect if you are not careful. Players sometimes need time to soak things in.
We are very lucky to have an owner who is willing to put in that kind of investment to keep Jimmy all the way until the end of his contract in order to develop Lance properly and we should make good use of that time. What Jed didn't sign up for is to play Lance prematurely and to tank the team. Lance is simply not ready, he is lost out there. You can't play a future franchise QB like a power back who runs between the tackles and dives down head first in every other play. I don't think I have even seen him slide once.
Never underestimate the role of the scout team QB and how it can help to develop a QB. Lance needs to take those reps seriously. And who came up through the scout team system? Aaron Rodgers and he did 3 years of it!