LISTEN: The 49ers Get Snowplowed In Buffalo →

There are 278 users in the forums

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS at CHICAGO BEARS - 2021 Game 7

Shop Find 49ers gear online

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS at CHICAGO BEARS - 2021 Game 7

Oct 31, 2021 at 2:07 PM
Originally posted by NCommand:


Maybe you should check into 2021 "data."

Not comprehensive enough.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:08 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by NCommand:


Maybe you should check into 2021 "data."

Not comprehensive enough.

Esp. given your "study" was from 1984 when there was 1 mobile QB. Now there are a lot. Time to update to reality.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:09 PM
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Jimmy G came up big, Fields impressed me, he can run but at the same time, he was elusive in the pocket. It feels damn good to get a W.

Fields has been crap this year outside the 1st half of todays game.

Fields had the one touchdown because Armstead missed a tackle. Fields was not good today lol

He was pretty good. They didn't punt a single time until midway through the 3rd.

175 yds, 1 td, 1 INT against a D that couldn't get out of its own way.

He also had 100 yards rushing and a rushing TD. The int was basically a desperation throw after the game was over. He looked accurate and wasn't holding onto the ball like he has in the past.

So we're praising the other teams mobile QB and not the air yard QB with 300 yards and a win?

Interesting.

I did praise Jimmy for playing well, so I'm not sure what you mean. I just disagreed with the assessment that Fields played poorly.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:10 PM
Originally posted by NCommand:
Esp. given your "study" was from 1984 when there was 1 mobile QB. Now there are a lot. Time to update to reality.

It's almost as if extreme exaggerations legitimately make great points on here.



Is it me or does that say 2020??
[ Edited by random49er on Oct 31, 2021 at 2:14 PM ]
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:11 PM
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Much needed win, gimpy Kyler next week .....

If he plays at all. High ankle sprain for a mobile QB is rough.

Mobile QB's don't get injured.

Need to be mobile like Wilson where running is the absolute last resort.

Murray has taken his biggest beatings in the pocket. He rarely takes a big hit while he's out on the run. Got that pro level baseball slide and everything.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:17 PM
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Yeah I just read that. I'm hoping we hit on some of these rookies.

So does Shanny/Lynch or might cost them ... but thats another thread So far Mitchel draft steal and the spot duty J.Moore has played he has done good. And i hope Hufanga can settle in as Safety
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:18 PM
It's all about keeping the volume of hits,...big hits, down.

Research on NFL quarterback injuries compiled by injury coordinator John Verros at Sports Info Solutions shows the risk of a quarterback being injured on a designed run is remote — only one for every 236 plays.

The risk for a scrambling quarterback is almost equal to the quarterback who is sacked: once every 91.7 plays for the scrambler, once every 92.5 plays for the guy getting sacked.

The most dangerous play category Verros discovered is the knockdown; the quarterback who is taken to the ground while unleashing a pass, as when the Jaguars' Nick Foles suffered a broken clavicle after being struck while releasing a pass against the Chiefs. That player is hurt once every 67.3 plays.

"I believe the risk of a running QB being more prone to injury in comparison to a pocket passer is overstated by many analysts," Verros told SN. "One caveat would be that a running QB will attempt so many rushes per game that the sheer volume will still put him at an increased risk."



And the reason that mobile QBs are less injured than pocket QBs (given those #s above) is that those #s include all QBs, yet, obviously, guys like Lamar and Murray are more adept at getting out of the way of hits than Tom Brady or Matt Ryan.

It doesn't mean to pound your QB up the middle every play, but everytime you see someone posting that they get injured more, just know that it's hogwash.
[ Edited by random49er on Oct 31, 2021 at 2:21 PM ]
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:20 PM
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Much needed win, gimpy Kyler next week .....

If he plays at all. High ankle sprain for a mobile QB is rough.

Mobile QB's don't get injured.

Need to be mobile like Wilson where running is the absolute last resort.

Murray has taken his biggest beatings in the pocket. He rarely takes a big hit while he's out on the run. Got that pro level baseball slide and everything.

Yeah that's a paradox of them also them knowing the can run. So they look downfield more hoping to find an open guy and end up holding it too long.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:23 PM
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Yeah that's a paradox of them also them knowing the can run. So they look downfield more hoping to find an open guy and end up holding it too long.

Lol not really,...as of now he hasn't missed an NFL start for his career. 40 for 40. There's danger in the pocket just as there's danger out of it. Again, the volume of hits.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:23 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Esp. given your "study" was from 1984 when there was 1 mobile QB. Now there are a lot. Time to update to reality.

It's almost as if extreme exaggerations legitimately make great points on here.



Is it me or does that say 2020??

I may be going out on a limb here but I'll deduce that QBs with crappy lines get hurt the most. The average contracts of LTs confirm this theory.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:28 PM
Originally posted by mitpdub: I may be going out on a limb here but I'll deduce that QBs with crappy lines get hurt the most. The average contracts of LTs confirm this theory.

That got me thinking, how many left handed QBs are in the league? I can't remember the last left handed QB since Tebow.

Edit- that's right, Tua.
[ Edited by Afrikan on Oct 31, 2021 at 2:30 PM ]
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:33 PM
FEELS GREAT BABY
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:41 PM
Originally posted by socal1632:
Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Originally posted by eric_anthony:
Originally posted by SantaCruzNiner:
Whoo! Victory! Hopefully we can trade the bust Lance (2nd worst Niners draft pick ever after A.J. Jenkins) for a second. Jimmy trained under Brady. Keep him till he's 50.

Who's got it better than us? Nobody!!!!!

Lance a bust?? After one game under his belt?? Get the hella outta here

Add him to your block list. All he does is post inciting b******t

Trey is more athletically gifted than Fields. Fields throws a great ball.

Nope. Unless you count bulldozing ability.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:46 PM
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Yeah that's a paradox of them also them knowing the can run. So they look downfield more hoping to find an open guy and end up holding it too long.

This is also true although Murray hasn't been anywhere near as bad as Wilson in that category. Wilson leads the NFL in sacks that the QB is responsible for and its not even close. Make big plays, take big sacks. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Oct 31, 2021 at 2:50 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Esp. given your "study" was from 1984 when there was 1 mobile QB. Now there are a lot. Time to update to reality.

It's almost as if extreme exaggerations legitimately make great points on here.



Is it me or does that say 2020??

Time to update.
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone