Originally posted by NCommand:Yeah, but Jimmy hasn't been without four of his five top skill position players, which was what I was saying. And 2019 had a functional passing game, but it had an elite run offense and an elite defense, and that's why we did so well.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
(1) That doesn't apply to this discussion, because, when the team has been injured to high heaven, JIMMY was also injured!
(2) What excuse did I make for Mahomes? I just pointed out that his worst output of his career was better than Jimmy's best season.
That's still not the degree to which Brady had his entire starting skill players out save one person. It's a matter of degree, not kind.
Not a "QB-centric" offense? Who was it that mentioned "themes of the week?" You got to be kidding me. The entire NFL calls this offense extremely QB friendly, if the QB can learn the complexities of the verbiage. How in the world is simply needing the QB to convert short third downs not QB-centric?
Do you just mean volume? The reason this passing offense has low volume is because if it had high volume Jimmy would consistently hand the game over to the other team. That's why it's so incredibly QB-friendly, where all the QB has to do is not throw inexplicable interceptions.
1. 2019 we were the 6th least healthiest team. We currently are dead last of lost games with the projected starters. See...this is just normal for us. 32 players already on I.R. this year. 45 last year.
2. Again, that's because of the type of offense they run and and their philosophy with that QB. Those are QB-centric offenses. This is a RB-centric offense and it was constructed that way on purpose.
If that was true, why didn't Alex Smith even come close to Mahomes' production. Dude, Mahomes is going to wear a gold jacket. Mark my words on that. He's going to be a Hall of Famer, and THAT is the primary reason he has been so productive — even when he's playing "bad." (and bad for him is good for an average QB)
EDIT -- wait, I got it for you! Thanks to Marcellus Wiley, who said this: "Jimmy G is not great enough to not be good."
That's your difference, and what that means is, Patrick Mahomes can play poorly, but he's good enough to consistently pull himself out of the hole he dug. Jimmy isn't. So Jimmy has to always be on his P's and Q's, and if he's not, it's pretty much a guaranteed loss. That's why we're 7-0 when he throws no INTs and we're 1-6 when he does. He's just not great enough to not be good.
It probably will eventually, in a few years (when Trey fully understands NFL defenses). But what will change almost immediately is that the very same offense is going to work better, because the QB is going to stop throwing so many stupid picks, he will pick up first downs when everyone is covered, he will exploit the outside and down the field routes that are called every game but rarely thrown, and he will not airmail walk in touchdowns.
Like I said, this won't change when Trey steps in. You seem to think it'll change drastically to a QB-centric offense like Brady/Mahomes. Nope.
There is nothing unrealistic about expecting a QB to read the defense post-snap, to throw reasonably accurate when the ball travels 5 yards down the field, and to not throw inexplicable interceptions that give JT O'Sullivan a run for his money.
Apples and oranges in construct, philosophy and focus. This leads you and others to have very unrealistic expectations for the QB's here.
You said this offense isn't "QB-centric" because it has a low volume of pass plays. But it IS QB friendly, because the majority of the passes called are passes college and some high school QBs can execute.
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Dec 24, 2021 at 3:32 PM ]