What will Jimmy's trade value be in the offseason?

Originally posted by NinerGM:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
waiting on more dominos

ATT this one's for you

For everyone who suggested the #49ers weren't hurt in FA by keeping Jimmy on the roster pic.twitter.com/CNNxhUH9Yq

— Ben Meyerson (@ByBenMeyerson) March 24, 2022

Great 49ers gift ideas ⇨

Of course this is the outcome. Why? Because the FO had been telling us for 2 years prior that there's a huge advantage having a FQB on a rookie deal. Not sure why that logic suddenly wanes simply because the FO makes a mistake with trading their starting QB on schedule. You can love your team just like your family but not agree with everything they do - particularly when they contradict their own stated goals.

Lunch just earlier this month talked about the advantage of a rookie QB contract

"There's always an advantage," John Lynch told Keiana Martin of 49ers.com last week at the NFL Scouting Combine. "I remember being a broadcaster, and Russell Wilson [was drafted] in the third round. There was a huge advantage for years. And when they had to pay Russell, some of that depth, their sixth, seventh, and eighth D-linemen weren't quite as good as before because they couldn't continue to pay. So, there certainly are some realities that come with that."

Now it's heading into the 2nd yr of that rookie deal, we got no real in-game development from Lance, & no "advantage" thus far with that freed up cap space. Now they can take advantage of it after this yr and f**king better. There's NO excuses for 2023 FA. No excuses for not paying Bosa/Deebo or bringing in legit upgrades. none.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by flynhayn15:
If you are being honest, if I told you had to rank the likelihood of one of the following players, Skule, Mckivitz, Moore, Banks, Brunskill …….or Compton, to be graded at 89 by PFFat RT last year, how many players would you have placed above Compton?

My point is, we don't know how the players will play in game time situations, until we give them a chance. Sure, maybe the team caught lightning in a bottle and they wasted all of their good juju with the OLine gods last year, but I for one would rather have an honest assessment of our young depth and see if a player or two rises up and takes a big leap forward. I definitely would prefer that over signing an old vet past him prime, and being right back in the same predicament next year.

Compton had a score of 89 based off his run-blocking. His pass-pro was in the low 60s (brunskill had one of the worst PBLK scores in the league for a starter at like 48). I for one would love to have legit starters in place and help the young QB instead of keeping a backup QB on the books for $27M. Not sure why anyone would be disagreeing with this take

How is signing 24 yr old James Daniels to 3yrs $26M or Austin Corbett (at 26) for the same contract...fit signing an old vet past his prime? That's great value! The only "old vet past his prime" I see is SF signing 36 yr old Alex Mack with no plan past him and who thought about retiring this off season.

My man!

Have the fans ever stopped to think for 13 seconds that Lance is simply not ready? Let's be real here, just because many here saw some practice throws that every single mobile QB in the universe makes in practice doesn't mean the 21 year old is ready. Beating the Texans is nice but everyone does outside of one misslip by a mediocre Chargers team.. He's inexperienced and played against 2nd rate college scrubs with the luxury of having an all-star roster for one not even insanely impressive year.

We are a Super Bowl roster, not a babysitter. The window is now. The FO job is to win, not sacrifice it all to play with their shiny new toy just to appease fans with the patience of a young adolescent.

I get it, Jimmy triggers the hell out of some here and I think it's hilarious. He's Kap on steroids with all the hate and triggeredness and it's great to watch such fans squirm. You deserve it.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by flynhayn15:
If you are being honest, if I told you had to rank the likelihood of one of the following players, Skule, Mckivitz, Moore, Banks, Brunskill …….or Compton, to be graded at 89 by PFFat RT last year, how many players would you have placed above Compton?

My point is, we don't know how the players will play in game time situations, until we give them a chance. Sure, maybe the team caught lightning in a bottle and they wasted all of their good juju with the OLine gods last year, but I for one would rather have an honest assessment of our young depth and see if a player or two rises up and takes a big leap forward. I definitely would prefer that over signing an old vet past him prime, and being right back in the same predicament next year.

Compton had a score of 89 based off his run-blocking. His pass-pro was in the low 60s (brunskill had one of the worst PBLK scores in the league for a starter at like 48). I for one would love to have legit starters in place and help the young QB instead of keeping a backup QB on the books for $27M. Not sure why anyone would be disagreeing with this take

How is signing 24 yr old James Daniels to 3yrs $26M or Austin Corbett (at 26) for the same contract...fit signing an old vet past his prime? That's great value! The only "old vet past his prime" I see is SF signing 36 yr old Alex Mack with no plan past him and who thought about retiring this off season.

Amen

I've been critical of shanalynch. However I have forgivin due to the results on the field. A superbowl appearance and nfccg in last 3 years is damn good.

Most posters on here want Lynch fired now because he hasn't shipped off Jimmy, ignoring the actual on field results. I say you guys aren't fans of the team, you're just fans/haters of certain players. Shame on you guys

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
I've been critical of shanalynch. However I have forgivin due to the results on the field. A superbowl appearance and nfccg in last 3 years is damn good.

Most posters on here want Lynch fired now because he hasn't shipped off Jimmy, ignoring the actual on field results. I say you guys aren't fans of the team, you're just fans/haters of certain players. Shame on you guys

That is exactly what you do. You ignore what actually happens on the field and just look at the score at the end of the game.

This is a mistake by Lynch. The time to snag great players was this off-season.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
I've been critical of shanalynch. However I have forgivin due to the results on the field. A superbowl appearance and nfccg in last 3 years is damn good.

Most posters on here want Lynch fired now because he hasn't shipped off Jimmy, ignoring the actual on field results. I say you guys aren't fans of the team, you're just fans/haters of certain players. Shame on you guys

That is exactly what you do. You ignore what actually happens on the field and just look at the score at the end of the game.

This is a mistake by Lynch. The time to snag great players was this off-season.

Isnt the score at the end of the game all that matters?


If the results are there whonare we to question it?

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
I've been critical of shanalynch. However I have forgivin due to the results on the field. A superbowl appearance and nfccg in last 3 years is damn good.

Most posters on here want Lynch fired now because he hasn't shipped off Jimmy, ignoring the actual on field results. I say you guys aren't fans of the team, you're just fans/haters of certain players. Shame on you guys

That is exactly what you do. You ignore what actually happens on the field and just look at the score at the end of the game.

This is a mistake by Lynch. The time to snag great players was this off-season.

Isnt the score at the end of the game all that matters?


If the results are there whonare we to question it?

If what happens on the field didn't matter, Trey Lance wouldn't be on this team.

Nice. New media report to cry over. Yesterday was boring.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by flynhayn15:
If you are being honest, if I told you had to rank the likelihood of one of the following players, Skule, Mckivitz, Moore, Banks, Brunskill …….or Compton, to be graded at 89 by PFFat RT last year, how many players would you have placed above Compton?

My point is, we don't know how the players will play in game time situations, until we give them a chance. Sure, maybe the team caught lightning in a bottle and they wasted all of their good juju with the OLine gods last year, but I for one would rather have an honest assessment of our young depth and see if a player or two rises up and takes a big leap forward. I definitely would prefer that over signing an old vet past him prime, and being right back in the same predicament next year.

Compton had a score of 89 based off his run-blocking. His pass-pro was in the low 60s (brunskill had one of the worst PBLK scores in the league for a starter at like 48). I for one would love to have legit starters in place and help the young QB instead of keeping a backup QB on the books for $27M. Not sure why anyone would be disagreeing with this take

How is signing 24 yr old James Daniels to 3yrs $26M or Austin Corbett (at 26) for the same contract...fit signing an old vet past his prime? That's great value! The only "old vet past his prime" I see is SF signing 36 yr old Alex Mack with no plan past him and who thought about retiring this off season.

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Can't say I'm a fan of this rationale.

What rationale? Having multiple scenarios based on what happens? Sounds smart to me.

Originally posted by BleedsRedNGold:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Can't say I'm a fan of this rationale.

What rationale? Having multiple scenarios based on what happens? Sounds smart to me.

What's everyone expect him to say while trading him? Admit we are desperate?

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
I've been critical of shanalynch. However I have forgivin due to the results on the field. A superbowl appearance and nfccg in last 3 years is damn good.

Most posters on here want Lynch fired now because he hasn't shipped off Jimmy, ignoring the actual on field results. I say you guys aren't fans of the team, you're just fans/haters of certain players. Shame on you guys

+ Show all quotes
That is exactly what you do. You ignore what actually happens on the field and just look at the score at the end of the game.

This is a mistake by Lynch. The time to snag great players was this off-season.

Isnt the score at the end of the game all that matters?


If the results are there whonare we to question it?

If what happens on the field didn't matter, Trey Lance wouldn't be on this team.

That's not the point. My argument was at the end of the day the results are what they are. A superbowl appearance and an nfccg in 3 years. If you guys want to question Lynch NOW because Jimmy is still on the team, that's on you guys. Bottom line, I just want the team to win. If shanalynch think this is best, and the fans have trust in them, let it be.

Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
Problem is he did, and the rest of the league laughed their ass off at him. What he didn't have was a back up plan.

Exactly.. his ego allowed him to think he will do what he wants and what he wants other teams to do.. but he had no plan b... i understand it is unlawful to dare question lynch but its fine to admit he was not good here in the handling of jimmy. now of course. i am sure he will start to pivot if he ever comes out of his hole and start to say. well. its not a bad thing if jimmy is still on our team.. and of course that message will be preached by his minions,. now i am wondering what his plan is for the o line now that he let a couple guys walk. is it the draft? or is it.. we HOPE banks can get it done. i know fans and lynch fans want to believe that we are above the rest of the nfl laughing at us but in this case. the rest of the nfl flipped lynch off and here we are with non stop qb drama

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
That's not the point. My argument was at the end of the day the results are what they are. A superbowl appearance and an nfccg in 3 years. If you guys want to question Lynch NOW because Jimmy is still on the team, that's on you guys. Bottom line, I just want the team to win. If shanalynch think this is best, and the fans have trust in them, let it be.

winning does not mean getting second place all the time or almost getting over the hump.. but never wanting to do anything to actually get us over the hump. do you think the team is in the win now mode like they supposedly were last year? i really do not think they are