What will Jimmy's trade value be in the offseason?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Yet 49ers haven't shown Jimmy the door.

Derp.

Because they don't have too. His injured and has gtd cash because of it. Get a clue

Colts didn't have to either. Yet they did.

Great points guys

Originally posted by NDSU:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
How is 9-6 not good? It's .600. Bill Walsh career is .609 for example.

Really? 9-6 is good to you? Come on man.

So are you saying Walsh's career mark is no good?

Originally posted by NDSU:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
like meaning do it on those teams the other QBs are on (ie do it somewhere else)

Kyle had to change his whole offense and could only muster up a QB who can only hand off and throw contested passes over the middle.

Which is really kind of odd. I went back and watched some earlier year Jimmy tape and he was chucking the ball all over.
He looked really good in his earlier years compared to what we saw last year.

in those early tapes he was throwing INTs and not too many passes to the outside. his legs helped him out in those games also

i was very excited at the beginning also, but the injuries and continuation of making the same mistakes over the middle started to humble my excitement as time went by

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Yet 49ers haven't shown Jimmy the door.

Derp.

Because they don't have too. His injured and has gtd cash because of it. Get a clue

Colts didn't have to either. Yet they did.

Great points guys

Thanks for proving my point….colts were on the hook for like $20- $15M regardless if they cut him or not. DC actually took all of Wentz's contract AND gave up draft capital instead of trading for Jimmy lol.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by NDSU:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
How is 9-6 not good? It's .600. Bill Walsh career is .609 for example.

Really? 9-6 is good to you? Come on man.

So are you saying Walsh's career mark is no good?

please don't insult BW to make an awful take

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Jimmy' three ideal landing spots are gone. Broncos, Colts and steelers. He is f**ked. Going to the Panthers is career suicide. He's better taking a paycut and staying put here waiting for a better opportunity next year.

Or go start somewhere like the panthers who don't have a awful roster….what you don't think he could do better than Sam did?

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Jimmy' three ideal landing spots are gone. Broncos, Colts and steelers. He is f**ked. Going to the Panthers is career suicide. He's better taking a paycut and staying put here waiting for a better opportunity next year.

He's better off being a backup for the 9ers then starting for the Panthers?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Jimmy' three ideal landing spots are gone. Broncos, Colts and steelers. He is f**ked. Going to the Panthers is career suicide. He's better taking a paycut and staying put here waiting for a better opportunity next year.

Or go start somewhere like the panthers who don't have a awful roster….what you don't think he could do better than Sam did?

Carolina and Darnold started off good.. injuries took a toll on them.

If i was Carolina, i would try one more year with Darnold and hope C Mac can stay healthy

I understand the 7.5 million aspect.
I have seen people mention starting him.
I don't think it is best for the offensive progression to have him on the team for the 2022 season. And I don't understand the mindset of people who do.
That's all I'm saying.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
I haven't seen anyone seriously suggest we bring back and start JG. I think the divide I'm seeing some people want to cut JG like yesterday. Other people want see if JG getting back to 100% health results in a trade market. At the very least getting back to 100% means we avoid paying 7.5 million to a cut player.

Originally posted by Lott42:
I understand the 7.5 million aspect.
I have seen people mention starting him.
I don't think it is best for the offensive progression to have him on the team for the 2022 season. And I don't understand the mindset of people who do.
That's all I'm saying.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
I haven't seen anyone seriously suggest we bring back and start JG. I think the divide I'm seeing some people want to cut JG like yesterday. Other people want see if JG getting back to 100% health results in a trade market. At the very least getting back to 100% means we avoid paying 7.5 million to a cut player.

If Jimmy's at the helm with this roster, we'd get to the playoffs and Trey gets more development time. It wouldn't be BAD, but it's just not IDEAL. The problem with Jimmy staying is that, I think Trey can have similar/better production for $20M less of a cap hit. We already spent some money on Sudfield for him to be our backup and we'd like to allocate money elsewhere.

The shoulder surgery was catastrophic for trade plans, and hurt both the 49ers AND Jimmy. In order to save $7.5M, we have to wait until Jimmy is healthy before we can cut him. While we wait, we can't be as aggressive about going after higher tier free agents. By the time Jimmy is healthy, all the priority free agents will be gone.

At this point, if someone wants to trade for Jimmy, we just need to take what we can get. Otherwise, we're going to have to cut him once he's healthy, and Jimmy's probably going to end up at a really crappy situation for him.

Originally posted by Lott42:
I understand the 7.5 million aspect.
I have seen people mention starting him.
I don't think it is best for the offensive progression to have him on the team for the 2022 season. And I don't understand the mindset of people who do.
That's all I'm saying.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
I haven't seen anyone seriously suggest we bring back and start JG. I think the divide I'm seeing some people want to cut JG like yesterday. Other people want see if JG getting back to 100% health results in a trade market. At the very least getting back to 100% means we avoid paying 7.5 million to a cut player.

Maybe share some of those people legit saying he should start. I think people are saying trade is ideal but if no trade partner maybe we bring him back. Schefter laid out this scenario a while back. If we don't get the trade comp he said we can bring him back and perhaps trade later on or play out the deal and get a comp pick back. Wouldn't be the worst thing in the world imo if no trade materializes. Course if Trey is blowing JG away KS sets the depth chart however we have the best chance to win. I expect Lance to start Week 1.

Jimmy was smart for activating that injury clause, he knows how to play the game. He knows he will never see a contract like his current deal ever again so why not squeeze out every penny?

They drafted a QB, he activated the injury clause, what is the next move by either party...?

Originally posted by glorydayz:
Jimmy was smart for activating that injury clause, he knows how to play the game. He knows he will never see a contract like his current deal ever again so why not squeeze out every penny?

They drafted a QB, he activated the injury clause, what is the next move by either party...?

But, once he passes his physical he'll lose that injury clause.

Originally posted by glorydayz:
Jimmy was smart for activating that injury clause, he knows how to play the game. He knows he will never see a contract like his current deal ever again so why not squeeze out every penny?

They drafted a QB, he activated the injury clause, what is the next move by either party...?

This is nothing new. Jimmy activates his injury nearly every year.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by NDSU:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
How is 9-6 not good? It's .600. Bill Walsh career is .609 for example.

Really? 9-6 is good to you? Come on man.

So are you saying Walsh's career mark is no good?

please don't insult BW to make an awful take

Relax with reading into stuff that isn't there. Not talking about the careers of the two men. Talking about what is a good win percentage. A good number. I feel .600 is good.