Next year @ QB, you want _______ under center:

Originally posted by WINiner:
I want Lance. He's the guy I went nuts over us drafting cause he's who I wanted all along and he's the guy that I think can be the next great young NFL QB that gets added to the group of young QB's in this league that people are excited about. I think Lance can put Kyles offense over the top. I think by seasons end in 22 people are going to just include the 49ers in talk of the best teams in the NFL, there will be no argument. I think by seasons end 2022 the morons talking about firing Shanahan will be choking on all the crow.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by RocketMan:
These reports from Shefter and from players who allegedly spoke to Montana, is it possible this is being orchestrated to boost Jimmy's trade value. I don't see why you would trade 3 firsts and then have your guy sit behind an average quarterback for two years. One year I can understand, but not two years.

Don't worry, Rocket - it won't happen.

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by RocketMan:
These reports from Shefter and from players who allegedly spoke to Montana, is it possible this is being orchestrated to boost Jimmy's trade value. I don't see why you would trade 3 firsts and then have your guy sit behind an average quarterback for two years. One year I can understand, but not two years.

Don't worry, Rocket - it won't happen.

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Posted about an hour apart from each other.

Mayo you are easily one of my favorite posters on this board, no bs.

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

It was actually 3 years. Rodgers took over at the start of year 4. The difference was Favre was a great QB. Jimmy is..................Jimmy.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by RocketMan:
These reports from Shefter and from players who allegedly spoke to Montana, is it possible this is being orchestrated to boost Jimmy's trade value. I don't see why you would trade 3 firsts and then have your guy sit behind an average quarterback for two years. One year I can understand, but not two years.

Don't worry, Rocket - it won't happen.

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Posted about an hour apart from each other.

Mayo you are easily one of my favorite posters on this board, no bs.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by RocketMan:
These reports from Shefter and from players who allegedly spoke to Montana, is it possible this is being orchestrated to boost Jimmy's trade value. I don't see why you would trade 3 firsts and then have your guy sit behind an average quarterback for two years. One year I can understand, but not two years.

Don't worry, Rocket - it won't happen.

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Posted about an hour apart from each other.

Mayo you are easily one of my favorite posters on this board, no bs.

Hes constantly everywhere on a topic. It's really weird lol

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Originally posted by Blake_Fever:

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Completely untrue. And this is the great fallacy people still believe.

If Jimmy stays, his contract is off the books after 2022. Samuel isnt technically a FA until 2023 and Bosa, not until 2024. If they are signed to extensions this offseason, the front office could easily structure it so more of the financial burden hits in later years.

Jimmy staying would, however, limit how many other FAs SF can sign--their own or others.

Originally posted by Blake_Fever:

Originally posted by mayo49:
If Jimmy came back I wouldn't complain - Rodgers sat behind Favre for four years, so I don't think it would be the end of the world if Trey sat another year. The only negative would be that we wouldn't be able to re-sign some of our free agents, ala, Deebo and Bosa.

Completely untrue. And this is the great fallacy people still believe.

If Jimmy stays, his contract is off the books after 2022. Samuel isnt technically a FA until 2023 and Bosa, not until 2024. If they are signed to extensions this offseason, the front office could easily structure it so more of the financial burden hits in later years.

Jimmy staying would, however, limit how many other FAs SF can sign--their own or others.