Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 9moon:
I saw Grappy much like Troy Aikman.. he will never have the greatest stats obviously, and he was a right play call away or 2 from beating KC in the Super Bowl..
Troy Aikman was still among the best QBs in the league when he was in his prime. People make the mistake of looking at his stats and comparing them to modern QBs and forming an opinion based on that.
Aikman was a better QB (relative to his peers) than Jimmy, and this isnt particularly close. (And I hate using the "this isnt close" tagline because most people use it when it it actually is close. This isnt.)
I never posted that GRAPPY'S AS GOOD AS AIKMAN.. my point is that Grappy will never have the greatest stats much like Aikman.. In Aikman's best years, it was never closed to the likes of Marino or Kelly or even Warren Moon or better yet, our very own Steve Young... What Aikman had was a HC and an OC that knew how to use him best..
Aikman had
elite and I mean
elite accuracy. At every level of the field. Completion percentage isn't the same as accuracy, but the Cowboys had a down the field offense, so it means more than short passing offenses. Here's his ranking in comp% over a six year span: 2nd, 5th, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, and 2nd (1991-1996). That's why he's in the Hall of Fame, and that's a big part of why the Cowboys won three Super Bowls that year.
He was not the best at reading defenses. He wasn't bad. But he wasn't at Steve Young level. But he was pinpoint in a way that Jimmy will never touch. If you want to compare him to a modern QB, maybe Rivers, but on a better team. Maybe a tiny bit more accurate relative to his peers.