Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:i know a lot of people don't have patience and feel the need to make these super early rankings... but who knows this early.. #11 could be our #1 by the end of the season
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:i wouldn't agree.. haven't seem them play yet
John Chapman had a great idea for assessing the roster after the draft. He ranks the top starting positions and its depth.
Do you guys agree?
[1 is the best, 11, worst]
Starting Rank | Position | (Depth Rank):
1 LB (7)
2 ER (2)
3 TE (6)
4 WR (10)
5 CB (3)
6 DT (5)
7 QB (1)
8 T (11)
9 S (9)
10 RB (8)
11 IOL (4)
He's talking just talent regarding team needs. Yes, a talented player could play like ass so we don't know officially yet.
Totally understand.
Mine would be a tad different; based on question marks. That doesn't mean they couldn't ascend once playing though and others rated higher, couldn't regress.
1 ER (1)
2 LB (7)
3 WR (5)
4 RB (2)
5 TE (6)
6 CB (3)
7 DT (8)
8 T (10)
9 QB (11)
10 S (9)
11 IOL (4)
For me, I'm too lazy to do this stuff. I'd rather have the *hall of fame* experts do my work for me, and will wait till I actually see them in pre-season to even attempt stuff this complicated.
Hahaha!!!!