There are 367 users in the forums

Drake Jackson-DE-USC, 2nd Round 2022 Draft

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

Huh?
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

LOL
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

That is called creepy math and creepy math is a part of Webzone history. IYKYK.

Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

Imaging if he was just ok. Ok = 20+ sacks
LOL

Meh = breaking sack record and some
Originally posted by thl408:
I think that's very realistic to expect his breakout in 2024. He's a young buck and has a lot to learn. We all want that huge jump in his second year but realistically I'm just looking for gradual improvement from him between week 1 and week 18.

Right. He'll be doing very well to get 5 sacks against decent tackles. We should still be looking for an older vet with a history of production. Honestly, Im not sure Hyder has enough gas in the tank to fill that role for 500 snaps.
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

Imaging if he was just ok. Ok = 20+ sacks

Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

That is called creepy math and creepy math is a part of Webzone history. IYKYK.


No this is people only quoting part of a post, and not reading fully - an even bigger part of Webzone history. I admit the stats are a reach, but the thinking behind the "math" part was explained by the OP.
  • Koldo
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,816
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL


Maths iz hard.


I think the constant acceleration equations show what will happen when Bosa chases the QB to Jackson. Splat!
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

That is called creepy math and creepy math is a part of Webzone history. IYKYK.


No this is people only quoting part of a post, and not reading fully - an even bigger part of Webzone history. I admit the stats are a reach, but the thinking behind the "math" part was explained by the OP.

I was waiting for OP to respond to admit I did take his words out of context as a joke.

I'm still not sure I agree with the logic fully but I understand what he was saying.
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

That is called creepy math and creepy math is a part of Webzone history. IYKYK.


No this is people only quoting part of a post, and not reading fully - an even bigger part of Webzone history. I admit the stats are a reach, but the thinking behind the "math" part was explained by the OP.

Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

8 is awfully close to 10 dude LOL

What about this one?
Originally posted by jdt84_2:
If he is good he will likely get 15+ sacks, if he is great 10-15.

good = 15+ sacks, great = 10-15. LOL

Imaging if he was just ok. Ok = 20+ sacks

LMAO this might be the funniest stuff I've ever read on here.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Gotta love the webzone. We predicting double digit sacks based off the fact that he's in shape. Just give me 8 and I'll be pleased

I'm expecting him to have between 5 and 7 this season. Anything less than 5 would be a little disappointing Tbh.
Search Share 49ersWebzone