There are 290 users in the forums
Originally posted by lamontb:
B/c they only like tackles that are tall with huge wingspans. They have a specific type at tackle and they stick to it. McKivitz, MM, Compton, TW, and Moore are all 6'5 and up with super long wingspans. Burford doesn't fit. He was drafted to be a guard. Not sure why he's regressed so much from last year
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by lamontb:
B/c they only like tackles that are tall with huge wingspans. They have a specific type at tackle and they stick to it. McKivitz, MM, Compton, TW, and Moore are all 6'5 and up with super long wingspans. Burford doesn't fit. He was drafted to be a guard. Not sure why he's regressed so much from last year
Has he though ? I remember he was struggling in a lot of reps, and that's why he split reps with Brunskill. The expectation was him taking a leap forward.
Originally posted by lamontb:
B/c they only like tackles that are tall with huge wingspans. They have a specific type at tackle and they stick to it. McKivitz, MM, Compton, TW, and Moore are all 6'5 and up with super long wingspans. Burford doesn't fit. He was drafted to be a guard. Not sure why he's regressed so much from last year
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by lamontb:
B/c they only like tackles that are tall with huge wingspans. They have a specific type at tackle and they stick to it. McKivitz, MM, Compton, TW, and Moore are all 6'5 and up with super long wingspans. Burford doesn't fit. He was drafted to be a guard. Not sure why he's regressed so much from last year
Has he though ? I remember he was struggling in a lot of reps, and that's why he split reps with Brunskill. The expectation was him taking a leap forward.
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Brunskill was better than both him and mckivitz and could play either spot... We let him walk for peanuts...
.
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Brunskill was better than both him and mckivitz and could play either spot... We let him walk for peanuts...
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Burford needs to be benched, he's getting beat a lot this season.
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Burford needs to be benched, he's getting beat a lot this season.
Jaylon Moore earlier on in his career was playing G, maybe they give him another shot once Trent returns?
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Burford needs to be benched, he's getting beat a lot this season.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Burford needs to be benched, he's getting beat a lot this season.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Brunskill was better than both him and mckivitz and could play either spot... We let him walk for peanuts...
I always liked Brunskill and he never complained despite playing pretty much every position on the line besides LG during his tenure. I think they did save money by not paying Brunskill but Burford's lack of progress is very troubling
Originally posted by dj43:They didn't need a crystal ball. They should have valued his versatility if nothing else.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Brunskill was better than both him and mckivitz and could play either spot... We let him walk for peanuts...
I always liked Brunskill and he never complained despite playing pretty much every position on the line besides LG during his tenure. I think they did save money by not paying Brunskill but Burford's lack of progress is very troubling
Burford has regressed in PP from last season. That was particularly notable in these past three games.
I was sorry to see Brunskill leave. We saved a bit over $1M in cap room by letting him go to Tennessee where he is having a solid year - ranked #22 by PFF. Had the FO had a crystal ball, I'm sure they would have spent the money to keep DB here. Oh well...
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by dj43:They didn't need a crystal ball. They should have valued his versatility if nothing else.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Brunskill was better than both him and mckivitz and could play either spot... We let him walk for peanuts...
I always liked Brunskill and he never complained despite playing pretty much every position on the line besides LG during his tenure. I think they did save money by not paying Brunskill but Burford's lack of progress is very troubling
Burford has regressed in PP from last season. That was particularly notable in these past three games.
I was sorry to see Brunskill leave. We saved a bit over $1M in cap room by letting him go to Tennessee where he is having a solid year - ranked #22 by PFF. Had the FO had a crystal ball, I'm sure they would have spent the money to keep DB here. Oh well...