QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
He only ran an offense scoring over 30 ppg, and he's only undefeated in games he could throw.

His poise only reminds Ronnie Lott of Joe Montana, and his playmaking only makes Steve Young mention Patrick Mahomes.

Nothing elite there guys

Elite, by definition must be sustained. Stidham looked elite against our defense last year. Does that make him elite?

Nobody said he is elite, you'd have to be Andrew Luck or something for anyone to consider you elite after a year.

But when respected football minds say he looks like Montana and Mahomes while he's leading the league in scoring, I'd say he played elite

you and two other have said he's elite lol

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

nothing in life is guaranteed and nothing stays the same

If you follow the 49ers.. we've gotten excited about Alex Smith, Shaun Hill, Kaep, Mullens, Jimmy G and now Purdy.

I'm just saying the odds are not in favor of just picking up where we left off.. and Purdy coming off major surgery to boot. If Purdy wasn't injured i would feel better.

But right now, i just see the QB position as a big ?

The only one I was excited about was Kap, Jimmy & Purdy. I personally never thought any of the rest were capable of being elite.

i said excited.. but if you have eliteness on the mind. we currently don't have anyone close to that right now

Well Purdy has played elite throughout his 6 games in the regular season and if not elite in the playoffs, very damn good (several rookie records). So in my opinion, he's the only one that has shown anything like that on the roster.

im tired of mediocre QBs and above average qb play on our guys best days. I want elite and nothing else. Keep looking until we do.

Purdy, Elite ?

is this an obnoxious moment ?

He said Purdy was elite in the regular season, which is 100% true.

you guys are using that term a little too loosely now days lol

He played elite. We've gone from I see a big ? mark to not wanting to give him his dues

lol it is a big question mark.. just cause he's not elite currently, doesn't make what he did last year less of a great time

Pretending that we are calling him elite

Is this an obnoxious moment?

I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

I still would've considered him the starter, after all he was a rookie 7th round pick at some point he was bound to lose. Just like at some point Lance won a game. Lol

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

I don't think the narritive would have changed. If he didn't get hurt and didn't play well, I think getting us to the NFCCG would have been enough for him to keep the job in '23. Now, if he struggles in '23, then I think, they put in Trey and hope he goes in and does a better job. JMO.

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
He only ran an offense scoring over 30 ppg, and he's only undefeated in games he could throw.

His poise only reminds Ronnie Lott of Joe Montana, and his playmaking only makes Steve Young mention Patrick Mahomes.

Nothing elite there guys

Elite, by definition must be sustained. Stidham looked elite against our defense last year. Does that make him elite?

That's why I specifically said - he isn't an elite player. He played at an elite level in his short sample size.

for example, Joe Flacco isn't/wasn't an elite QB, right? But the year they won the Super Bowl - he went on a terror and played at a ridiculously high level (elite) and lead them to a Super Bowl victory. His stats and everything back that up. If I'm not mistaken he had like 11 TDs and 0 INT in those playoff games.

it's the same thing. He played at an elite level for a stretch of time but isn't an elite player because he couldn't sustain it like the greats do. That's why I want to see what Purdy looks like going forward. Nothing loose about that.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

I don't think the narritive would have changed. If he didn't get hurt and didn't play well, I think getting us to the NFCCG would have been enough for him to keep the job in '23. Now, if he struggles in '23, then I think, they put in Trey and hope he goes in and does a better job. JMO.

Purdy didn't have his best game but he played really damn good against a top 3 defense in the nfl and the second best pass rush.

this is why using just stat lines with no context is ridiculous. I think Purdy really won over John and Kyle because of his performance in the playoffs. He didn't come close to having a bad game - he actually set nfl records or matched them.
You're playing the best teams on the biggest stage and delivered.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

I don't think the narritive would have changed. If he didn't get hurt and didn't play well, I think getting us to the NFCCG would have been enough for him to keep the job in '23. Now, if he struggles in '23, then I think, they put in Trey and hope he goes in and does a better job. JMO.

Purdy didn't have his best game but he played really damn good against a top 3 defense in the nfl and the second best pass rush.

this is why using just stat lines with no context is ridiculous. I think Purdy really won over John and Kyle because of his performance in the playoffs. He didn't come close to having a bad game - he actually set nfl records or matched them.
You're playing the best teams on the biggest stage and delivered.

Didn't have his best game? He lasted a whole series.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

He said that he would lose his job if he didn't inrove and correct deficiencies.

every single player would lose their depth spot/job if they didn't improve or correct deficiencies.. lol what kind of post is this

Every player has deficiencies that they never correct and lots don'tosw their job.

If he plays as he did all last year, why should he lose his job?

You also called him a flash in the pan.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

He said that he would lose his job if he didn't inrove and correct deficiencies.

every single player would lose their depth spot/job if they didn't improve or correct deficiencies.. lol what kind of post is this

Every player has deficiencies that they never correct and lots don'tosw their job.

If he plays as he did all last year, why should he lose his job?

You also called him a flash in the pan.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

nothing in life is guaranteed and nothing stays the same

If you follow the 49ers.. we've gotten excited about Alex Smith, Shaun Hill, Kaep, Mullens, Jimmy G and now Purdy.

I'm just saying the odds are not in favor of just picking up where we left off.. and Purdy coming off major surgery to boot. If Purdy wasn't injured i would feel better.

But right now, i just see the QB position as a big ?

No one was excited about Alex in his rookie year.

And Shaun Hill? LOL

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

He said that he would lose his job if he didn't inrove and correct deficiencies.

every single player would lose their depth spot/job if they didn't improve or correct deficiencies.. lol what kind of post is this

Every player has deficiencies that they never correct and lots don'tosw their job.

If he plays as he did all last year, why should he lose his job?

You also called him a flash in the pan.

Flash in the pan? How about a super nova?

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

I don't think the narritive would have changed. If he didn't get hurt and didn't play well, I think getting us to the NFCCG would have been enough for him to keep the job in '23. Now, if he struggles in '23, then I think, they put in Trey and hope he goes in and does a better job. JMO.

Purdy didn't have his best game but he played really damn good against a top 3 defense in the nfl and the second best pass rush.

this is why using just stat lines with no context is ridiculous. I think Purdy really won over John and Kyle because of his performance in the playoffs. He didn't come close to having a bad game - he actually set nfl records or matched them.
You're playing the best teams on the biggest stage and delivered.

Didn't have his best game? He lasted a whole series.

Mayo - I was referencing the comment above about Purdy not playing well against Dallas.

Originally posted by JTB1974:
I wonder if the narative around Brock would have changed if he didn't get hurt vs the Eagles and didn't play well and we still lost. Because he didn't play that good vs the Cowboys in the divisional RD. No TD passes and we only scored 19 points. Luckily for us Prescott was horrible.

Against the Cowboys he moved the chains and did what he asked to. The Cowboys run D stunk and we wanted to control the game and keep it out of their top rated offense. McGlinchy was also being tossed around that game badly.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

He said that he would lose his job if he didn't inrove and correct deficiencies.

every single player would lose their depth spot/job if they didn't improve or correct deficiencies.. lol what kind of post is this

Every player has deficiencies that they never correct and lots don'tosw their job.

If he plays as he did all last year, why should he lose his job?

You also called him a flash in the pan.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
49erATT seems kinda triggered by the confidence in Brock.

Doesnt read as triggered. More like let's wait and get a bigger sample. I would agree.

Been down this path with Kap and Jimmy. Need larger samples. Stuff Brock succeeded at was definitely more repeatable since it wasn't based on improv but still demands a larger sample.

Cautiously optimistic.

nothing in life is guaranteed and nothing stays the same

If you follow the 49ers.. we've gotten excited about Alex Smith, Shaun Hill, Kaep, Mullens, Jimmy G and now Purdy.

I'm just saying the odds are not in favor of just picking up where we left off.. and Purdy coming off major surgery to boot. If Purdy wasn't injured i would feel better.

But right now, i just see the QB position as a big ?

No one was excited about Alex in his rookie year.

And Shaun Hill? LOL

i swear every post is ignorance from you lol

as for past QB history.. i've been hear for all of it, so stop the BS

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
nothing in life is guaranteed and nothing stays the same

If you follow the 49ers.. we've gotten excited about Alex Smith, Shaun Hill, Kaep, Mullens, Jimmy G and now Purdy.

I'm just saying the odds are not in favor of just picking up where we left off.. and Purdy coming off major surgery to boot. If Purdy wasn't injured i would feel better.

But right now, i just see the QB position as a big ?

The only one I was excited about was Kap, Jimmy & Purdy. I personally never thought any of the rest were capable of being elite.

i said excited.. but if you have eliteness on the mind. we currently don't have anyone close to that right now

Well Purdy has played elite throughout his 6 games in the regular season and if not elite in the playoffs, very damn good (several rookie records). So in my opinion, he's the only one that has shown anything like that on the roster.

im tired of mediocre QBs and above average qb play on our guys best days. I want elite and nothing else. Keep looking until we do.

Purdy, Elite ?

is this an obnoxious moment ?

He said Purdy was elite in the regular season, which is 100% true.

you guys are using that term a little too loosely now days lol

He played elite. We've gone from I see a big ? mark to not wanting to give him his dues

lol it is a big question mark.. just cause he's not elite currently, doesn't make what he did last year less of a great time

Pretending that we are calling him elite

Is this an obnoxious moment?

pretending.. would be saying someone is playing elite but they are not elite lol