Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
4 out 5 drives went scoreless with a grand total of 65 yards avd three 3 and outs and Darnold had a good game... Dude throws a ball across his body on a bootleg right into a defender and not a word.
It's called double standards. A guy, a career bust with 55+ starts gets every excuse and actually gets praised for 4 out of 5 scoreless drives and 3 three and outs but we completely demoralize a guy with 4 starts.
I stand by my comment but this thread is not the place.
So.. I take it that you aren't going with "DarnoldDeyEeyDey"?
Nope. He's already proven he's a bust that played worse than Trey for years. I don't admire that like some hypocritically do here. 55 game bust is a hero.
Idk if anyone admires him. Maybe a couple people, but the majority seem to just like him as a quality backup, which he is. The goal was to have the best backup qb we can get.
i said it before - Alex smith had almost the same amount of turnovers in his first five years (he had one less than what darnold has in his first five years). Then harbaugh came and Alex smith became a completely different play who rarely turned over the ball. I'm expecting the same thing from darnold. I'm not looking for him to be a stud and I really don't want to see him on the field. I Just think he could be serviceable for a few games if we need him.
the fact we sent Trey to the cowboys tells you that the team doesn't think Trey has upside and isn't very good. We wouldn't send him to a conference rival, while we are both competing for a super bowl, if they believe he was capable of becoming a good player.
you feel how you feel, no biggie, I just don't think anyone is a big fan of darnold. Lol I'd rather have Brock than darnold, Lance, and dak.
im really happy with who our starter is and I think he has more upside than all those guys.