Originally posted by Waterbear:
I keep saying this but Grant doesn't analyze football like other reporters. His takes align with whatever is the most controversial. That's his shtick because that was his fathers shtick. When everyone zigs he zags. That's how he gains so many followers. He's more entertainment then football analyst. The moment 49ers media starts to blame Purdy, Grant will blame Kyle. The moment media members blame Kyle, he'll blame Purdy.
I think collectively as the webzone we need to stop pretending like these are honest football takes by Grant. He can make good points or bad points, but they're always for the wrong reasons.
He's a troll. And he's good at it.
The thing is, by doing that he gets people talking about him. People are in this thread discussing cohn, not jack hammer or maiocco or barrows or Jesse Naylor or Vish or film analysis by jonnydel or any other beat writer or content creator. Being controversial or having a contrarian opinion always will get people out to complain.
It's something that skip bayless have done so well, when you just create something controversial and get people riled up for/against it
There clearly is audience for it, and it actually shows most people rather discuss things that are very loosely related to actual football and more of a debate points x versus y, who is better, etc. Sadly more people are interested in that shallow level of "analysis" and discourse than the actual roster, film, play design breakdown, etc. Grant actually can watch film and dissect plays like a football film guy can, he just rarely does it and those videos don't pull numbers.
That isn't to say I like Grant. I don't like that dude at all. But he does this content because theres audience for it.