There are 263 users in the forums
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
So do almost TD's weigh as heavy as almost INT's?
Which stat is associated stronger with losing and winning? Having +1 INT or having +1 TD?
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
I would say as a general rule, you need 2TDs to counter 1 INT.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Haven't seen it brought up but the throw purdy made to start the 4th quarter to cmc was a DIME
he stepped up in the pocket and threw it to where only cmc could make a play on it but he dropped it.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Haven't seen it brought up but the throw purdy made to start the 4th quarter to cmc was a DIME
he stepped up in the pocket and threw it to where only cmc could make a play on it but he dropped it.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
I would say as a general rule, you need 2TDs to counter 1 INT.
I don't agree with that. 1 TD - 1 INT= 0 in my book. But again, the subject was actually about almost INT's being weighed as a factor in QBR but dropped TD passes aren't weighed at all.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Haven't seen it brought up but the throw purdy made to start the 4th quarter to cmc was a DIME
he stepped up in the pocket and threw it to where only cmc could make a play on it but he dropped it.
Originally posted by Jeepzilla:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
I would say as a general rule, you need 2TDs to counter 1 INT.
I don't agree with that. 1 TD - 1 INT= 0 in my book. But again, the subject was actually about almost INT's being weighed as a factor in QBR but dropped TD passes aren't weighed at all.
I don't know how this plays into it….
In a study conducted by the Harvard Sports Analysis Collective, it was found that a team that wins the turnover margin in a game wins 69.6 percent of the time. To demonstrate the relative strength of turnover influence, home teams won "just" 57.2 percent of all games in the same sample. The effect is compounding as well, as teams that won the turnover margin by two or more won 83.9 percent of the time and 90.7 percent of the time when winning the margin by three or more.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I heard on the radio today that purdy was benched multiple times at iowa state?
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I heard on the radio today that purdy was benched multiple times at iowa state?
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
I would say as a general rule, you need 2TDs to counter 1 INT.
I don't agree with that. 1 TD - 1 INT= 0 in my book. But again, the subject was actually about almost INT's being weighed as a factor in QBR but dropped TD passes aren't weighed at all.
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Having +1 TD. Although, I would say that it depends on where on the field that INT is thrown and if it directly leads to points for the other team. But I wasn't talking about actual TD's and actual INT's since QBR apparently counts almost INT's but does not count almost TD's.
I would say as a general rule, you need 2TDs to counter 1 INT.
I don't agree with that. 1 TD - 1 INT= 0 in my book. But again, the subject was actually about almost INT's being weighed as a factor in QBR but dropped TD passes aren't weighed at all.
My point is if a QB has a 2 TD, 1 INT game, he's playing to the point where he isn't the reason for a loss or a win. If it's 1/1 then you could say he didn't produce enough.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:I think he might have. But I mean he started 48 games at Iowa State. He was the main QB for all 4 years of his college career. And Iowa State was constantly out matched in terms of talent. I think on of the times was a game he threw a lot of INTs against Iowa. But that defense was very good.
I heard on the radio today that purdy was benched multiple times at iowa state?