QB Brock Purdy Thread

Not bad. #2 in EPA/play after 3 weeks.

Originally posted by picklejuice:
the amazing hidden gems we find in the late round feel so blessed after watching the jimmyg raiders

COMPETITION is very healthy... even if the battle is between a rookie QB to battle a veteran 3rd stringer..

Listening to that loudmouth idiot Bart Scott talking about Purdy on ESPN was disgusting. Basically said he sucks, Daniel Jones is better, Purdy has no skillset, is carried. The same old crap everyone is saying. Can't believe these guys are allowed on TV. The national media has no clue about Purdy and they will NEVER give him credit due to his draft position, even if he wins a SB. The guys on YouTube who do All-22 breakdowns like JTO and others are drooling over how good Purdy is. They're so much better to watch than these national media idiots.

It's funny how former players like Bart Scott think they have valid opinions because they played the game; as if someone who has never played at a high level can't understand the game better than them.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Steve smith is actually a 49ers fan? That's pretty cool. I wasn't aware

Swear on @CutToIt's Grandma Betty's blanket, the @49ers are gonna win tomorrow night 😤🙏#SFvsDAL | #FTTB pic.twitter.com/JNM8RAVmnT

— NFL GameDay (@NFLGameDay) January 16, 2022

That's awesome. He's a dog, he would of fit in with our current team so well. He was a stud and really good.

So I was just listening to a Drew Bledsoe podcast with Chris long. He talked about how he was offered the role in "Something about Mary" that Favre took. Lol apparently Cameron Diaz is a big 49ers fan and originally wanted Steve young for it but because he's a Mormon, he couldn't accept it. Lol

Originally posted by Leathaface:
Listening to that loudmouth idiot Bart Scott talking about Purdy on ESPN was disgusting. Basically said he sucks, Daniel Jones is better, Purdy has no skillset, is carried. The same old crap everyone is saying. Can't believe these guys are allowed on TV. The national media has no clue about Purdy and they will NEVER give him credit due to his draft position, even if he wins a SB. The guys on YouTube who do All-22 breakdowns like JTO and others are drooling over how good Purdy is. They're so much better to watch than these national media idiots.

It's funny how former players like Bart Scott think they have valid opinions because they played the game; as if someone who has never played at a high level can't understand the game better than them.

I bet a lot of these guys just watch highlights and cop opinions they find on twitter/x. Plus Purdy is an insult to professional analysts, who make a living hyping measurable s, who will miss on a guy who just makes better reads and processes better after the snap. They cant get over it. I tell ya, after watching josh allen jump around like a crack head desperate to make a play,, Im pretty happy with our guy thank you very much.

i watch brock purdy highlights every night before i go to sleep. the 49er fan life is so cozy

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by Leathaface:
Listening to that loudmouth idiot Bart Scott talking about Purdy on ESPN was disgusting. Basically said he sucks, Daniel Jones is better, Purdy has no skillset, is carried. The same old crap everyone is saying. Can't believe these guys are allowed on TV. The national media has no clue about Purdy and they will NEVER give him credit due to his draft position, even if he wins a SB. The guys on YouTube who do All-22 breakdowns like JTO and others are drooling over how good Purdy is. They're so much better to watch than these national media idiots.

It's funny how former players like Bart Scott think they have valid opinions because they played the game; as if someone who has never played at a high level can't understand the game better than them.

I bet a lot of these guys just watch highlights and cop opinions they find on twitter/x. Plus Purdy is an insult to professional analysts, who make a living hyping measurable s, who will miss on a guy who just makes better reads and processes better after the snap. They cant get over it. I tell ya, after watching josh allen jump around like a crack head desperate to make a play,, Im pretty happy with our guy thank you very much.

I think that's what the majority of them do. I guarantee you Bart Scott isn't watching All-22 film on the 49ers and making a decision on Purdy. Not like a loudmouth unintelligent guy like him would offer substance if watched the film anyway.

Either way, I hope NFL teams share this opinion of Purdy so they can continue to think they will "expose" him by doing things like running Cover 0 all game.

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I bet a lot of these guys just watch highlights and cop opinions they find on twitter/x. Plus Purdy is an insult to professional analysts, who make a living hyping measurable s, who will miss on a guy who just makes better reads and processes better after the snap. They cant get over it. I tell ya, after watching josh allen jump around like a crack head desperate to make a play,, Im pretty happy with our guy thank you very much.

I think this is the key issue TBH. It's the draft position but more what it implies if Purdy is so good; what did we analysts miss? The evaluators are so obsessed with physical attributes, because they are easy to recognise and easily on display, they don't consider the mental aspects of playing the position. This is compounded by college football defenses being inept and big highlight reel plays of guys dominating lesser competition. Executing an offensive scheme gets you dismissed as a game manager, as if it somehow makes you less of a player because you don't play hero ball.

I wanted Trey to have a fair shot at the starting job this offseason, and I wasn't thrilled at the decision making and loss of draft picks as I felt the organisation took a swing for him but never followed through. However, Brock is the real deal and they made the right decision in going with him.

The hate is about ego preservation for the scouts, evaluators and media pundits (and I'm aware we passed on him so many times too in the draft).

Originally posted by Leathaface:
Listening to that loudmouth idiot Bart Scott talking about Purdy on ESPN was disgusting. Basically said he sucks, Daniel Jones is better, Purdy has no skillset, is carried. The same old crap everyone is saying. Can't believe these guys are allowed on TV. The national media has no clue about Purdy and they will NEVER give him credit due to his draft position, even if he wins a SB. The guys on YouTube who do All-22 breakdowns like JTO and others are drooling over how good Purdy is. They're so much better to watch than these national media idiots.

It's funny how former players like Bart Scott think they have valid opinions because they played the game; as if someone who has never played at a high level can't understand the game better than them.

It's not true at all. Just watch the games.

Originally posted by Buchy:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I bet a lot of these guys just watch highlights and cop opinions they find on twitter/x. Plus Purdy is an insult to professional analysts, who make a living hyping measurable s, who will miss on a guy who just makes better reads and processes better after the snap. They cant get over it. I tell ya, after watching josh allen jump around like a crack head desperate to make a play,, Im pretty happy with our guy thank you very much.

I think this is the key issue TBH. It's the draft position but more what it implies if Purdy is so good; what did we analysts miss? The evaluators are so obsessed with physical attributes, because they are easy to recognise and easily on display, they don't consider the mental aspects of playing the position. This is compounded by college football defenses being inept and big highlight reel plays of guys dominating lesser competition. Executing an offensive scheme gets you dismissed as a game manager, as if it somehow makes you less of a player because you don't play hero ball.

I wanted Trey to have a fair shot at the starting job this offseason, and I wasn't thrilled at the decision making and loss of draft picks as I felt the organisation took a swing for him but never followed through. However, Brock is the real deal and they made the right decision in going with him.

The hate is about ego preservation for the scouts, evaluators and media pundits (and I'm aware we passed on him so many times too in the draft).

A lot of that is happening for sure.

i feel like if taylor swift was younger and not old as hell 33 yr old milf she would be dating someone like brock purdy.

No serious person can believe Daniel Jones is better. No serious person can make a comment like that. Better at what? Better at being 6'5" 230 lbs.? There is not 1 thing he does better on the football field. From processing, reads, progressions, decision making, getting the ball out quick, excellent mechanics, throwing an accurate catachable ball. There is not 1 thing you can point to. Nothing at all.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Steve smith is actually a 49ers fan? That's pretty cool. I wasn't aware

Swear on @CutToIt's Grandma Betty's blanket, the @49ers are gonna win tomorrow night 😤🙏#SFvsDAL | #FTTB pic.twitter.com/JNM8RAVmnT

— NFL GameDay (@NFLGameDay) January 16, 2022

That's awesome. He's a dog, he would of fit in with our current team so well. He was a stud and really good.

So I was just listening to a Drew Bledsoe podcast with Chris long. He talked about how he was offered the role in "Something about Mary" that Favre took. Lol apparently Cameron Diaz is a big 49ers fan and originally wanted Steve young for it but because he's a Mormon, he couldn't accept it. Lol

I guess if it was Steve Young, then the line "I'm a 49er Fan" at the end to imply why she won't date Brett Favraa just wouldn't work.

I guess unless she says she is a Montana fan at the end.

Originally posted by Buchy:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I bet a lot of these guys just watch highlights and cop opinions they find on twitter/x. Plus Purdy is an insult to professional analysts, who make a living hyping measurable s, who will miss on a guy who just makes better reads and processes better after the snap. They cant get over it. I tell ya, after watching josh allen jump around like a crack head desperate to make a play,, Im pretty happy with our guy thank you very much.

I think this is the key issue TBH. It's the draft position but more what it implies if Purdy is so good; what did we analysts miss? The evaluators are so obsessed with physical attributes, because they are easy to recognise and easily on display, they don't consider the mental aspects of playing the position. This is compounded by college football defenses being inept and big highlight reel plays of guys dominating lesser competition. Executing an offensive scheme gets you dismissed as a game manager, as if it somehow makes you less of a player because you don't play hero ball.

I wanted Trey to have a fair shot at the starting job this offseason, and I wasn't thrilled at the decision making and loss of draft picks as I felt the organisation took a swing for him but never followed through. However, Brock is the real deal and they made the right decision in going with him.

The hate is about ego preservation for the scouts, evaluators and media pundits (and I'm aware we passed on him so many times too in the draft).

I agree with everything else you stated but I don't think this is a fair point. If you know a player is at the very bottom of everyone elses draft board, why would you draft that player any higher than you need to?

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
No serious person can believe Daniel Jones is better. No serious person can make a comment like that. Better at what? Better at being 6'5" 230 lbs.? There is not 1 thing he does better on the football field. From processing, reads, progressions, decision making, getting the ball out quick, excellent mechanics, throwing an accurate catachable ball. There is not 1 thing you can point to. Nothing at all.

This is how i picture the haters when they "attempt" to talk down to Purdys success