Originally posted by Bloodless:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
You are just arguing semantics then. You dont think he has been inaccurate, just off. Thats the same thing dude.
And when are we going to stop using completion percentage as a means of judging accuracy. Would you describe the following play to be an accurate throw?
Huge first down as Purdy finds Jennings for 20+ yards on 3rd & long #FTTB #ThursdayNightFootball #NFL #NFLTwitter pic.twitter.com/Q9JF84S9LQ
— Jus. #1 Sports Insider (@HeauxDat) September 22, 2023
I wouldnt, in spite of it being a completion.
And I am not accusing you of this, but just to reiterate, I have been very happy with Brock this year and so far in general. I think he has IT, and he could be a good one for a very long time. Criticism =/= hate.
Actually ya it was accurate, if he threw it more in front of Jennings then the safety picks it off (safety was playing mlb)
That is what I have observed as well. Purdy may seem inaccurate on passes where he is fitting it into tight windows. But with closer examination, you can see that he is keeping it out of harms way and putting it only where his receiver can make a play. He did put the ball in harms way twice though early in the giants game. Other than that, he has been pretty damn accurate.
There are a lot of throws like this. Where it appears when watching it live the ball could have been placed much better but in reality it is thrown their because that is where the lane to throw is. Also some throws that seem behind sometimes is his him leading the receiver away from a defender coming down. Just because a throw isn't on the numbers or leading the receiver forward doesn't mean that it isn't an accurate throw.
Agreed.