QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by All22:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by All22:
Honestly, Jimmy was doing better than ever in his last year here. His deep ball improved a bit and his TD/INT ratio went through the roof.
Brock is still a lot better and his jump from year 1 to year 2 has been impressive, especially considering he couldn't throw all offseason.

One poster here will disagree fervently with that.

Jimmy's efficiency went up after we acquired CMC. The ultimate checkdown for the checkdown master.

Alex Smith would like a word with you.

Alex smith was also held back according to you know who lol

Did Alex do better or worse once he went to KC with Reid?

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by Furlow:
Did Alex do better or worse once he went to KC with Reid?

He was basically the same exact player with better surrounding players for his skillset. Travis Kelce, Jamaal Charles… these were elite options for a QB who made his money with short passes and checkdowns. He still struggled getting the ball to wide receivers and pushing the ball down the field. It opened up slightly more when Tyreek came on the scene… who is an all time great deep threat and gravity type player.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Worse debateable, not as good or stayed the same def.

Couldn't get to a NFCCG also

Originally posted by Furlow:
I watched a couple of Raider games this year, and I'd say all of the above looked worse. But arm strength in particular. I mean he threw one fade to Adams that was about 10 yards short lol. Something is wrong with him. Maybe he spent the whole off season eating crackers and drinking wine, I don't know. But even Jimmy's worst critics cannot honestly say that he is the same QB that we had here. Kyle is good and gets the most out of his QB's, but he's not a damn wizard lol.

Originally posted by Furlow:
The weapons argument is so old and tired. Good lord, man. So do you agree with analysts who say that Purdy isn't very good because he has weapons?

Alex was much better in KC than in SF. He was absolutely held back by crappy coaches and OC's prior to Harbaugh.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by All22:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by All22:
Honestly, Jimmy was doing better than ever in his last year here. His deep ball improved a bit and his TD/INT ratio went through the roof.
Brock is still a lot better and his jump from year 1 to year 2 has been impressive, especially considering he couldn't throw all offseason.

One poster here will disagree fervently with that.

Jimmy's efficiency went up after we acquired CMC. The ultimate checkdown for the checkdown master.

Alex Smith would like a word with you.

Alex smith was also held back according to you know who lol

Did Alex do better or worse once he went to KC with Reid?

Worse debateable, not as good or stayed the same def.

Couldn't get to a NFCCG also

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:

McDaniels is as good of a coach as Kyle now.

You tell us. You were predicting far more Jimmy success in Vegas all offseason.

I thought that Jimmy being able to play with more freedom would help him. Didn't realize how broken he actually was/is. Busted up body plus freedom to do whatever you want = a lot of turnovers.

Jimmy aside, McDaniels isn't in the same universe as Kyle.

Even though you and I dont agree on Jimmy, at least you try to answer questions like others dont. So I will ask you this. What part of Jimmy's skillset has diminished from last season to this season? Is his mobility less? Is he slower running? Can he not throw the ball as far? Can he not throw the ball with as much velocity?

When someone is considered broken down or washed up, you can clearly see the difference in athleticism and skillset. So what did you see out of him that was markedly different than last season, where he had arguably played at the highest level he had as a 49er?

Why not talk about it in the Jimmy or Alex thread?

Dudes trashing the Brock thread with their Jimmy and Alex passing matches.

Same folks who do it in every QB thread.

Why don't you ask everyone who is doing it rather than just me?

Originally posted by Furlow:
The weapons argument is so old and tired. Good lord, man. So do you agree with analysts who say that Purdy isn't very good because he has weapons?

Alex was much better in KC than in SF. He was absolutely held back by crappy coaches and OC's prior to Harbaugh.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by Furlow:
The weapons argument is so old and tired. Good lord, man. So do you agree with analysts who say that Purdy isn't very good because he has weapons?

Alex was much better in KC than in SF. He was absolutely held back by crappy coaches and OC's prior to Harbaugh.

What in the world does my comment about Alex Smith have to do with my view of Purdy's success?

Purdy is successful because of his skillset. His production is elite because of skillset, surrounding weapons, and scheme. He's a very good QB on a very good team.

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Do you do anything else except play gatekeeper on threads?

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by All22:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by All22:
Honestly, Jimmy was doing better than ever in his last year here. His deep ball improved a bit and his TD/INT ratio went through the roof.
Brock is still a lot better and his jump from year 1 to year 2 has been impressive, especially considering he couldn't throw all offseason.

One poster here will disagree fervently with that.

Jimmy's efficiency went up after we acquired CMC. The ultimate checkdown for the checkdown master.

Alex Smith would like a word with you.

Alex smith was also held back according to you know who lol

Did Alex do better or worse once he went to KC with Reid?

Worse debateable, not as good or stayed the same def.

Couldn't get to a NFCCG also

His passer rating, yards, and TD's were better in every season he was with KC than any year he was in SF (except for rating in 2012 before he got hurt).

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Its ridiculous for anyone to believe that when discussing ____ QB, that conversations about other QBs wont pop up. Its like people have never had a conversation before.

Originally posted by Furlow:
His passer rating, yards, and TD's were better in every season he was with KC than any year he was in SF (except for rating in 2012 before he got hurt).

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by Furlow:
The weapons argument is so old and tired. Good lord, man. So do you agree with analysts who say that Purdy isn't very good because he has weapons?

Alex was much better in KC than in SF. He was absolutely held back by crappy coaches and OC's prior to Harbaugh.

What in the world does my comment about Alex Smith have to do with my view of Purdy's success?

Purdy is successful because of his skillset. His production is elite because of skillset, surrounding weapons, and scheme. He's a very good QB on a very good team.

You're dismissing Alex's improvement because of the weapons he had in KC. NFL analysts dismiss Purdy's play because of the weapons he has in SF. How is this difficult for you to see? Lol