QB Brock Purdy Thread

If Purdy finishes the season with an ugly stat line, I expect we offer 30m, agent wants 60, and we settle somewhere between 42-48m.

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
If Purdy finishes the season with an ugly stat line, I expect we offer 30m, agent wants 60, and we settle somewhere between 42-48m.

Book it.

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
If Purdy finishes the season with an ugly stat line, I expect we offer 30m, agent wants 60, and we settle somewhere between 42-48m.

Length and potential outs would be just as important, maybe even moreso, than the money. There's so many ways they can get creative with the contract and cap that it's hard to really predict what happens and what would be 'right'.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
hardly, he entered a like 1-10 situation and was crushing it. faced #1 D and put like 45 or so on em. this is back when we had no dominant D. we were garbage.

He "crushed it" for 5 games with 7 TDs and 5 INTs.

#BecausePerspectiveMatters

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
hardly, he entered a like 1-10 situation and was crushing it. faced #1 D and put like 45 or so on em. this is back when we had no dominant D. we were garbage.

He "crushed it" for 5 games with 7 TDs and 5 INTs.

#BecausePerspectiveMatters

watch the football you were on here saying he was crushing it. 100% of ppl were.

some perspective:

With Garoppolo under center, the 49ers scored on 62 percent of their offensive drives, 11 percent more than the second-place Patriots.[57] For perspective, NFL teams scored on 35 percent of their drives in 2017, and the 49ers scored on just 29 percent of their 2017 drives without Garoppolo.

I've been one of Purdy's biggest supporter. having said that, I think we should let him play out his last year of his contract unless he accepts a nice deal that lets FO build a good team around him.

If he decides to bet on himself and play it out, then use the non-exclusive tag that was used on L. Jackson. Let him test the market and we either match or get 2 number ones.

I'm just tired of getting burnt. We have been giving every player top dollar, whether they were or not, and that needs to end. Only give those to the players that are truly at the top of their positions. Like we did with Kittle, Warner, Bosa, and Williams.

I think Purdy is a fringe top 10 QB. He is good. Not some scrub. But just because of that we shouldn't break the bank on him and lose out on building a competitive team.

Originally posted by 49ers808:
Guess I'm the 1% then cause not revisionist for me. I would never make a guy the highest paid after a 5 game sample size of 7TDs and 5Ints

Well wasn't he set to be a FA after showing such promise? That raised his market value.

Problem is a poster here is pretending like Jimmy "earned" every dollar of that contract offer and refuses to acknowledge the concept of what market value even is.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
watch the football you were on here saying he was crushing it. 100% of ppl were.

some perspective:

With Garoppolo under center, the 49ers scored on 62 percent of their offensive drives, 11 percent more than the second-place Patriots.[57] For perspective, NFL teams scored on 35 percent of their drives in 2017, and the 49ers scored on just 29 percent of their 2017 drives without Garoppolo.

It shows that we were playing well with him at QB but it also should indicate how a small sample size can show outlier numbers (while not factoring circumstance, like opponents). Through nearly 8 full games prior to his injury, Jimmy was averaging an interception a game and the team was 7-2. Not an in depth analysis of his play, but a pretty good snapshot of his play and the team's success over his time here.

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
I've been one of Purdy's biggest supporter. having said that, I think we should let him play out his last year of his contract unless he accepts a nice deal that lets FO build a good team around him.

If he decides to bet on himself and play it out, then use the non-exclusive tag that was used on L. Jackson. Let him test the market and we either match or get 2 number ones.

I'm just tired of getting burnt. We have been giving every player top dollar, whether they were or not, and that needs to end. Only give those to the players that are truly at the top of their positions. Like we did with Kittle, Warner, Bosa, and Williams.

I think Purdy is a fringe top 10 QB. He is good. Not some scrub. But just because of that we shouldn't break the bank on him and lose out on building a competitive team.

^^^

What I don't like is our fan base turning on Purdy. Acting like he's some trash player. He's up some damn good tape and played way beyond his draft status and pay. We should be thankful for what he's brought to the organization instead of trashing him. That's Some f**ked up s**t.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by OnTheClock:

If Purdy finishes the season with an ugly stat line, I expect we offer 30m, agent wants 60, and we settle somewhere between 42-48m.

Length and potential outs would be just as important, maybe even moreso, than the money. There's so many ways they can get creative with the contract and cap that it's hard to really predict what happens and what would be 'right'.

I think we should add in incentives for production too. I considered for turnovers but that might backfire and get in his head.. IDK.

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
What I don't like is our fan base turning on Purdy. Acting like he's some trash player. He's up some damn good tape and played way beyond his draft status and pay. We should be thankful for what he's brought to the organization instead of trashing him. That's Some f**ked up s**t.

You should have seen what is was like here on the webzone in the early 90's when factions naturally developed to support Montana or Young. It was total chaos and an all-out bloodbath.

this site was alive in the early 90's?

I remember those days, there were posters like Eman and Bonnie and Shores Dave who were huge Steve Young fans and you would have thought Joe Montana was a bust, the way he was treated when he left the 49ers on this site.

Brock will not play out his contract. He will sit out before that happens, he is no different than any other pro football player. He wants his, for what he has done alone in the past 2 1/2 years has earned him a new contract. A record breaking contract? I don't think so, but enough to warrant not making peanuts to what the other QB's make that have never even sniffed a Superbowl yes.