There are 245 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by FootballExpert49ers:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
textbook case of how advanced stats and metrics can give wildly inaccurate results compared to the ol eye test.

Uh, Brock Purdy DESTROYS Stat Paddy in the eye test for anyone who has been watching football before 2018.

Stat Paddy's mechanics are ATROCIOUS, as are most QB mechanics these days. He plays like he's 5'11" rather than 6'3." Fans who just started watching football think that a shovel pass becomes amazeballz if the QB throws it behind his back. It doesn't. I can do the same thing.

There is literally nothing Stat Paddy has on Brock other than arm strength, which is the same thing Ryan Leaf had on Peyton Manning and Jim Druckenmiller had on Steve Young.

Oh, and he has the refs in his back pocket.

Stat Paddy is putting up Christian Ponder numbers this year, and people are still talking about him as though he's the Michael Jordan of football. It's sheer brain washing.

I disagree with everything you've said here. And the nicknames make your posts insufferable.

0/10 would not recommend
[ Edited by 5thSFG on Dec 16, 2024 at 2:49 PM ]
Originally posted by nolimit2game:
Huge Brock supporter, but that rams game was one of the most pathetic performances I've seen. I don't understand the short deep shots over and over. It was so bad it almost has me turning on him. Terrible qb play and terrible play calling if you know he can't hit those shots.

It's sad to be going through this again, thinking the qb the real deal to only find out nope again.
[ Edited by nolimit2game on Dec 16, 2024 at 2:51 PM ]
Originally posted by FootballExpert49ers:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
textbook case of how advanced stats and metrics can give wildly inaccurate results compared to the ol eye test.

Uh, Brock Purdy DESTROYS Stat Paddy in the eye test for anyone who has been watching football before 2018.

Stat Paddy's mechanics are ATROCIOUS, as are most QB mechanics these days. He plays like he's 5'11" rather than 6'3." Fans who just started watching football think that a shovel pass becomes amazeballz if the QB throws it behind his back. It doesn't. I can do the same thing.

There is literally nothing Stat Paddy has on Brock other than arm strength, which is the same thing Ryan Leaf had on Peyton Manning and Jim Druckenmiller had on Steve Young.

Oh, and he has the refs in his back pocket.

Stat Paddy is putting up Christian Ponder numbers this year, and people are still talking about him as though he's the Michael Jordan of football. It's sheer brain washing.

In the most respectful way, you are delusional.
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Back in the day Bill Walsh drafted guys for his system, there was a plan for the players he drafted.

It almost seems like we don't understand our systems, our systems keep changing, or we do not properly evaluate talent.

Look at the drafting of Solomon Thomas & J. Kinlaw, what was it about these two players that made them fit our system? What traits did they have that made them a lock for our D-Line?

Why was Beathard drafted in round 3 while Purdy was drafted dead last? Why didn't we value Purdy based on traits and system alignment prior to taking him dead last?

Great post. Its what makes the Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens, etc consistenly competitive. We could say the Niners over the past 5 years fit that billing to a degree but the draft whiffs kinda caught up with them this season.
Originally posted by hubbyt:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Back in the day Bill Walsh drafted guys for his system, there was a plan for the players he drafted.

It almost seems like we don't understand our systems, our systems keep changing, or we do not properly evaluate talent.

Look at the drafting of Solomon Thomas & J. Kinlaw, what was it about these two players that made them fit our system? What traits did they have that made them a lock for our D-Line?

Why was Beathard drafted in round 3 while Purdy was drafted dead last? Why didn't we value Purdy based on traits and system alignment prior to taking him dead last?

Great post. Its what makes the Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens, etc consistenly competitive. We could say the Niners over the past 5 years fit that billing to a degree but the draft whiffs kinda caught up with them this season.

Chiefs and Ravens are consistently good because they have franchise QBs.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Reports indicate he expects to reset the market with his new deal. I'm not saying the team should do that… I don't think they should at all… but you have to find a way to get him to sign a lower deal or not hold out for the final year of his rookie deal. 3 years 75 million is a nonstarter.

49ers countered, through Greg Pappa, after the Tom Pelissero tweet about Purdy wanting to reset the market, with a $50M or less approach.
The game has begun . . .
[ Edited by tommyncal on Dec 16, 2024 at 3:37 PM ]
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by hubbyt:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Back in the day Bill Walsh drafted guys for his system, there was a plan for the players he drafted.

It almost seems like we don't understand our systems, our systems keep changing, or we do not properly evaluate talent.

Look at the drafting of Solomon Thomas & J. Kinlaw, what was it about these two players that made them fit our system? What traits did they have that made them a lock for our D-Line?

Why was Beathard drafted in round 3 while Purdy was drafted dead last? Why didn't we value Purdy based on traits and system alignment prior to taking him dead last?

Great post. Its what makes the Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens, etc consistenly competitive. We could say the Niners over the past 5 years fit that billing to a degree but the draft whiffs kinda caught up with them this season.

Chiefs and Ravens are consistently good because they have franchise QBs.

They have franchise QBs AND they draft well. Dont look past that 2nd part. Which leads to everyones concern. If you pay Brock who is a lesser QB than the franchise guys they have, then you absolutely have to draft very well. Wont be able to pay the same amount of top dollar guys like we have now. And as we see this year, without everyone healthy Brock has been average and inconsistent, looks nothing like a franchise QB.
[ Edited by hubbyt on Dec 16, 2024 at 3:45 PM ]
Originally posted by hubbyt:
In the most respectful way, you are delusional.

In the least respectful way, you've never watched any team play besides the 49ers and just regurgitate idiotic talking heads.

There is no planet where a guy who is 32nd in air yards per attempt, 32nd in air yards per completion, and averages 6.7 yards per attempt and 10.0 yards per completion, is better than a guy who is 1st in air yards per attempt, 1st in air yards per completion, averages 8.4 yards per attempt and 12.9 yards per completion.

Especially when the first guy is doing it with a coach who has succeeded with every mediocre QB he's ever had while the second coach has flopped with most QBs he has had.
Originally posted by hubbyt:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by hubbyt:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Back in the day Bill Walsh drafted guys for his system, there was a plan for the players he drafted.

It almost seems like we don't understand our systems, our systems keep changing, or we do not properly evaluate talent.

Look at the drafting of Solomon Thomas & J. Kinlaw, what was it about these two players that made them fit our system? What traits did they have that made them a lock for our D-Line?

Why was Beathard drafted in round 3 while Purdy was drafted dead last? Why didn't we value Purdy based on traits and system alignment prior to taking him dead last?

Great post. Its what makes the Chiefs, Steelers, Ravens, etc consistenly competitive. We could say the Niners over the past 5 years fit that billing to a degree but the draft whiffs kinda caught up with them this season.

Chiefs and Ravens are consistently good because they have franchise QBs.

They have franchise QBs AND they draft well. Dont look past that 2nd part. Which leads to everyones concern. If you pay Brock who is a lesser QB than the franchise guys they have, then you absolutely have to draft very well. Wont be able to pay the same amount of top dollar guys like we have now. And as we see this year, without everyone healthy Brock has been average and inconsistent, looks nothing like a franchise QB.

Baltimore had missed the playoffs 4 of the last 5 season since the Superbowl. Drafted Jackson in 2018. Started that year 4-5 and when they made Jackson the starting QB they finished the year 6-1. Since then they have made the playoffs soon to be in 6 of the last 7 seasons.
Originally posted by 5thSFG:
I disagree with everything you've said here. And the nicknames make your posts insufferable.

0/10 would not recommend

That's because you've only been watching football since 2018.

I have been watching football dating back to 1977. I also study it obsessively. You have no clue what you're talking about.
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Does he mean he's a Football (soccer) expert? That would make more sense. I haven't heard such bad takes since I was a teen 20 years ago, and sadly I would watch Skip Bayless

You can't refute a single thing I said because it's all objectively true.

Why are there so many Stat Paddy fanboys on here? I mean, doesn't ANYONE reject the obvious, absurd brainwashing?
Originally posted by hubbyt:
They have franchise QBs AND they draft well. Dont look past that 2nd part. Which leads to everyones concern. If you pay Brock who is a lesser QB than the franchise guys they have, then you absolutely have to draft very well. Wont be able to pay the same amount of top dollar guys like we have now. And as we see this year, without everyone healthy Brock has been average and inconsistent, looks nothing like a franchise QB.

No, what we have seen this year is Brock has been playing with a serious injury he has no business playing with since the Vikings game.

Supporting cast has nothing to do with sailing balls 10 yards over the head of a receiver standing 2 yards away from you when you consistently hit everybody on the numbers the previous year.

Learn football.
FootballNovice set to pollute the thread with his insanely casual analysis mainly based on YPA and AirY/A.

Studies football obsessively and concludes Brock Purdy is better than Patrick Mahomes. Hahaha.
Originally posted by FootballExpert49ers:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Does he mean he's a Football (soccer) expert? That would make more sense. I haven't heard such bad takes since I was a teen 20 years ago, and sadly I would watch Skip Bayless

You can't refute a single thing I said because it's all objectively true.

Why are there so many Stat Paddy fanboys on here? I mean, doesn't ANYONE reject the obvious, absurd brainwashing?

There's a reason you've been banned multiple times already. You have some of the dumbest takes I've ever read like I said. Time to PM some mods
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
FootballNovice set to pollute the thread with his insanely casual analysis mainly based on YPA and AirY/A.

Studies football obsessively and concludes Brock Purdy is better than Patrick Mahomes. Hahaha.

Literally nobody in this thread has ever come up with any argument to defend Stat Paddy. It's all just personal insults, which tells you everything you need to know.

There is literally no argument you can make based on the facts. He dinks and dunks, his numbers are terrible, and the Chiefs' offense is middle-of-the-road the last 2 seasons. You think throwing a shovel pass behind the back means he's amazeballs?

Brock Purdy isn't just better than Stat Paddy, he's in a completely different stratosphere. Even playing injured this year, he's been better than Stat Paddy, which should tell you something.

Also,

20 years ago, nobody would have taken Stat Paddy seriously as a QB. Texas Tech QBs were laughed at. Kliff Kingsbury put up 5,000 yards playing in that Air Raid system.

But the game has been dumbed down so much that clowns like this were actually looked at as possible QBs, since modern NFL offenses resemble the Air Raid.

Andy Reid, the best play caller of the century, smartly adapts his offense to make it easy for clowns like Stat Paddy.

Stat Paddy has absolutely nothing that stands out other than the fact that he has such terrible mechanics that he makes the easiest throws look more difficult, and brainwashed fans think that means he's better.

If you took Stat Paddy's brain and threw it at a drinking straw, it would look like a kernel of corn going down the storm drain. He doesn't read coverages. He has no footwork. He's a chubby, babyfaced douchebag who can barely fit his helmet on his head because of his ridiculous hair. He leads the NFL in interceptions overturned by penalty by a country mile.

No matter how badly he plays, the fans never take any notice. They slurped up all of the propaganda for the NFL's attempt to use modern political attitudes to increase sales. Enough of that, though, since that's banned on this forum.

He has middle-of-the-road accuracy. He's a clumsy runner who wouldn't be able to run much if you were still allowed to hit the QB. He doesn't throw a tight spiral and the reason his guys have always dropped so many balls is his lack of touch.

The dude's a joke. It's obvious to anybody who thinks for themselves.
Share 49ersWebzone