There are 199 users in the forums
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
Last couple of posts i had to look to make sure it was about Brock Purdy. This aint got shat to do with Trump there is a political thread if you want to talk about him.
Thanks, bud - try a mediating career?
Just trying to get it back on track. Don't mean to sound so harsh.
Your not.
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
IMO having a strong roster with a market price QB is what make a GM top 5 .
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that depth (draft pick) to fill in his shoes.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that draft pick to fill in his shoes.
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
IMO having a strong roster with a market price QB is what make a GM top 5 .
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that depth (draft pick) to fill in his shoes.
I agree, I like what I am seeing with the picks from last years draft.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that draft pick to fill in his shoes.
It really depends on how many high priced players a team has on their roster. That's one of the issues facing SF. They have the highest paid pass rusher. The highest paid RB. The highes tpaid LB. One of the highest paid tackles. Plus 2 highly paid receivers. That's a lot of money for just a few players.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
IMO having a strong roster with a market price QB is what make a GM top 5 .
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that depth (draft pick) to fill in his shoes.
I agree, I like what I am seeing with the picks from last years draft.
We have some promising prospects, but now we have a top 11 pick in each round to really get some players. That's why I'm so excited.
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
IMO having a strong roster with a market price QB is what make a GM top 5 .
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by bud49:
I was listening to sports talk the other morning and they gave a couple examples of teams that gave market value to QB's and are still able to have a good team. Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts etc. I think if the organization is good at the top they can cope and deal with the cap in a way where the team can still be competitive.
It's called having depth on the team. That's why the draft is so important, when you have to get rid of the high priced vet and slip in that depth (draft pick) to fill in his shoes.
I agree, I like what I am seeing with the picks from last years draft.
We have some promising prospects, but now we have a top 11 pick in each round to really get some players. That's why I'm so excited.
I am too its been a while since I have been excited about an NFL draft.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
why should we agree on that? 2021 we were in the champ game. what i read on this board is jimmy was a mid level solid starting QB for years. and massively overpaid. but we were winning when he was healthy.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
why should we agree on that? 2021 we were in the champ game. what i read on this board is jimmy was a mid level solid starting QB for years. and massively overpaid. but we were winning when he was healthy.
The roster wasn't in complete shambles in 2021. Watch the film, Jimmy wasn't playing great ball. It was dump it to Deebo and let him make magic happen.
Herbert is a better QB than Jimmy G, yet he wasn't winning as many games.
Brock is a better QB, how much better is debatable.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Why do you guys give a s**t what Brock is going to get paid, you're not the f**king owners.
Originally posted by mayo49:
We have some promising prospects, but now we have a top 11 pick in each round to really get some players. That's why I'm so excited.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Why do you guys give a s**t what Brock is going to get paid, you're not the f**king owners.
Because it affects the cap space. Why does that have to be explained? Overpaying players is not a recipe to success.
if Brock wants $250M he's gonna have to be successful with a lesser team around him, you can't pay players when there's no cap space.
