QB Brock Purdy Thread

Just read that now that our season is over, the 49'ers are free to negotiate a contract extension with Brock. So the holdout begins…let the clock tick.

They better sign Purdy quickly after rolling over all that money.

Purdy hasn't signed yet... already holding out Fudge this guy

Stats are showing him as being remarkably mediocre. Someone at this point you just cannot trust giving a lot of money to.

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:
Stats are showing him as being remarkably mediocre. Someone at this point you just cannot trust giving a lot of money to.

did you even look at the stats?

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Purdy hasn't signed yet... already holding out Fudge this guy

He's holding out for less money

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
did you even look at the stats?

Brock ranked 14th in NFL.com's QB index.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Purdy hasn't signed yet... already holding out Fudge this guy

He's holding out for less money

Originally posted by ninerfaninnorcal:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
did you even look at the stats?

Brock ranked 14th in NFL.com's QB index.

whats the index part, i don't see that on NFL.com?

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
What would you guys say to trading Brock for a 2nd and trading our first at #11 next year for McCarthy from the Vikings?

Then the QB on a rookie contract timer resets almost fully and we still get a 2nd for Brock to upgrade DL/EDGE/OL. Can easily sign Greenlaw and some other top free agents as well.

Obviously this is a gamble since McCarthy is a complete unknown and coming off an injury, but where in the draft would he be going this year if he were in the 2025 draft? I have heard top 3? So giving up #11 doesn't seem unreasonable.

If he disappoints we will have a bad record next season and can go to the well again at QB at the top of the 2026 draft. Anyone know if 2026 is a good QB class at the top of the draft?

My biggest concern by far is having to commit to Brock for the next few years even if he regresses further or is the same as this year and can't move off him because of his huge contract.

Question is... who is the real Brock Purdy? The one from his first two years or the one from his last 18 games where he CLEARLY is not worth a contract of more than 35m/yr? If it is the latter we are ****ed for a long time. Recency bias is a thing, but we have a large sample size this past year that is trending down with Brock and I personally don't want to pay him big money until he shows this year was not who he is.

Yes I know you believe Brock is going to get the 55-60m deal/extension. I don't necessarily disagree.

I just don't think we should do it and want to consider all possible options before giving in.

What 49ers and fans want to pay him, 35-45 mil.
What he'll likely get due to market value, 50-65 mil.

Originally posted by fly15:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
What would you guys say to trading Brock for a 2nd and trading our first at #11 next year for McCarthy from the Vikings?

Then the QB on a rookie contract timer resets almost fully and we still get a 2nd for Brock to upgrade DL/EDGE/OL. Can easily sign Greenlaw and some other top free agents as well.

Obviously this is a gamble since McCarthy is a complete unknown and coming off an injury, but where in the draft would he be going this year if he were in the 2025 draft? I have heard top 3? So giving up #11 doesn't seem unreasonable.

If he disappoints we will have a bad record next season and can go to the well again at QB at the top of the 2026 draft. Anyone know if 2026 is a good QB class at the top of the draft?

My biggest concern by far is having to commit to Brock for the next few years even if he regresses further or is the same as this year and can't move off him because of his huge contract.

Question is... who is the real Brock Purdy? The one from his first two years or the one from his last 18 games where he CLEARLY is not worth a contract of more than 35m/yr? If it is the latter we are ****ed for a long time. Recency bias is a thing, but we have a large sample size this past year that is trending down with Brock and I personally don't want to pay him big money until he shows this year was not who he is.

You clearly love losing games

Lost 10 of them this year WITH Brock.

Didn't really love that.

Plenty of cheap QBs out there we could lose 10 games with. If he regresses further or plays like he did this year we will lose plenty of games next year and the year after and the year after since we would have no way to move on from him.

With his average to mediocre play this year, the best case Brock has is that there really are no good options for us this offseason to upgrade the position and that he had a good first couple years so we must and are forced to HOPE he can recapture that level of performance. Meaning we have to pay him HUGE $ for very few elite tangible traits and hope he can process his way back to better performances from his first two seasons and not look like a better Jimmy version 2.0 with ill-timed INTs when the game is in the balance. Since we are prob stuck with him I have not choice but to HOPE this year was an aberration. Wish we could just let him play out his contract and see what he does next season before paying him big.

I don't trust him anymore. I don't want to pay him 55-60m for past performance when I am no where near convinced his future performance will resemble his first two years. And I admit recency bias is a factor.

Brock believers I get why they have no problem paying him on a long-term deal.

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
What would you guys say to trading Brock for a 2nd and trading our first at #11 next year for McCarthy from the Vikings?

Then the QB on a rookie contract timer resets almost fully and we still get a 2nd for Brock to upgrade DL/EDGE/OL. Can easily sign Greenlaw and some other top free agents as well.

Obviously this is a gamble since McCarthy is a complete unknown and coming off an injury, but where in the draft would he be going this year if he were in the 2025 draft? I have heard top 3? So giving up #11 doesn't seem unreasonable.

If he disappoints we will have a bad record next season and can go to the well again at QB at the top of the 2026 draft. Anyone know if 2026 is a good QB class at the top of the draft?

My biggest concern by far is having to commit to Brock for the next few years even if he regresses further or is the same as this year and can't move off him because of his huge contract.

Question is... who is the real Brock Purdy? The one from his first two years or the one from his last 18 games where he CLEARLY is not worth a contract of more than 35m/yr? If it is the latter we are ****ed for a long time. Recency bias is a thing, but we have a large sample size this past year that is trending down with Brock and I personally don't want to pay him big money until he shows this year was not who he is.

I keep asking this question, but nobody on here seems to get it.

What are you hoping to do by paying Brock, whom you don't think is that good, $35 million to be the starting QB?

Do you think a QB who isn't that good can win the Super Bowl in this era?

He can't.

Unless you're the Queefs and have the best offensive and defensive minds in football, you can not win the Super Bowl without an elite QB.

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Lost 10 of them this year WITH Brock.

Didn't really love that.

Plenty of cheap QBs out there we could lose 10 games with. If he regresses further or plays like he did this year we will lose plenty of games next year and the year after and the year after since we would have no way to move on from him.

With his average to mediocre play this year, the best case Brock has is that there really are no good options for us this offseason to upgrade the position and that he had a good first couple years so we must and are forced to HOPE he can recapture that level of performance. Meaning we have to pay him HUGE $ for very few elite tangible traits and hope he can process his way back to better performances from his first two seasons and not look like a better Jimmy version 2.0 with ill-timed INTs when the game is in the balance. Since we are prob stuck with him I have not choice but to HOPE this year was an aberration. Wish we could just let him play out his contract and see what he does next season before paying him big.

I don't trust him anymore. I don't want to pay him 55-60m for past performance when I am no where near convinced his future performance will resemble his first two years. And I admit recency bias is a factor.

Brock believers I get why they have no problem paying him on a long-term deal.

Still thinking Lance needs more reps? Lol

Lance needs more and more chances when he clearly sucked but yet trade Purdy after a season of an insane amount of adversity...after winning back to back NFCC and an SB run.