There are 350 users in the forums
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Everything was clicking around the OL last year though. OL being bad last year doesn't mean they weren't a major problem this year
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Show me the proof that Brendel was better last yr. Thorn had this OL ranked below avg "his words" and he had it thwt high because of Kyle's scheme and TW being the goat. Brendel sucked last yr.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Damn straight!
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Show me the proof that Brendel was better last yr. Thorn had this OL ranked below avg "his words" and he had it thwt high because of Kyle's scheme and TW being the goat. Brendel sucked last yr.
we need the return of the SME for answers
Originally posted by NYniner85:
what's SME?
Never understood why using someone as knowledgeable as Thorn is a bad thing? Anyone with two eyes could see Brendel stunk. Every metric shows he was bad last yr and this yr.
SF was scoring points last yr, especially in the RZ. They got up quickly and it helped everything. More play-action, more run-blocking, less true pass sets. It's all linked together.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
what's SME?
Never understood why using someone as knowledgeable as Thorn is a bad thing? Anyone with two eyes could see Brendel stunk. Every metric shows he was bad last yr and this yr.
SF was scoring points last yr, especially in the RZ. They got up quickly and it helped everything. More play-action, more run-blocking, less true pass sets. It's all linked together.
Now they're talking about NC. He's the SME (subject matter expert). That was one of his favorite lines.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Oh boy lol. The amount of arguments I got in with NC over OL was next level. I think that's what he left
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Oh boy lol. The amount of arguments I got in with NC over OL was next level. I think that's what he left
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Aiyuk was dogs**t for the most part, 1 game over 50 yards out of 7 played. That's what disappointed me.
He clearly wasn't in shape or on the same page with Brock. I mean most guys that get massive deals and hold out here don't really have that pro-bowl season right after.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Aiyuk was dogs**t for the most part, 1 game over 50 yards out of 7 played. That's what disappointed me.
He clearly wasn't in shape or on the same page with Brock. I mean most guys that get massive deals and hold out here don't really have that pro-bowl season right after.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
i'd like to see him and cc come back they were good for conversation
Originally posted by TD49ers:
You mean using a tree in your backyard as a DB doesnt replace training camp.
Ya.....no need to be in shape. It's not like he is being paid to play football.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Aiyuk was dogs**t for the most part, 1 game over 50 yards out of 7 played. That's what disappointed me.
He clearly wasn't in shape or on the same page with Brock. I mean most guys that get massive deals and hold out here don't really have that pro-bowl season right after.
Pro Bowl? He wasnt even good except for one game.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Happens to a lot of folks holding out. Sounds like if Brock doesn't get his before OTAs he might sit out as well. We will see. It's just negations, part of the business. Team needs to get moving on stuff all the same.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Dude stop it. He was a top 10 WR and 2nd team all-pro last season. Why do you have to go to the extremes about everything?
in one breath you complain about Brock not playing well because of injuries and everything else being bad around him, then you s**t on his #1 receiver last yr 🤨
