QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by NYniner85:

I've said the love deal is probably the closest thing to comparable imo. Not a ton of experience with ups and downs. The difference between all those guys and Brock is they were all getting paid coming off one of their best seasons.

I mean let's use another player….how about BA. If he was headed into a contract yr this offseason, played all yr and wasn't playing great overall football (avg play) would we still be forced to have to making him one of the highest paid WRs in football?

But their seasons weren't as good as Brock's 2023.
You undervalue him.

There is zero chance he won't average $50 million per year IMO.

some brock content: barrows
grant: doofus

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mayo49:
He wouldn't have earn it? Yeah, he would have - hate the game not the player.

So every single player that's earned and extension deserves to be one of the highest paid players at their position. even if they didn't play to that level the yr they were heading into a contract extension?

If BA played all yr this yr and had an avg overall yr. Much worse than last yr, we are still obligated to make him one of the highest paid WRs in football? If you agree I will ask you why?

Your not obligated to do anything, unless he's under contract. If someone gets to the table of anything, then he deserves what he has coming to him.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
But their seasons weren't as good as Brock's 2023.
You undervalue him.

There is zero chance he won't average $50 million per year IMO.

if he gets 50m or some banana deal then we played ourselves, that's all that means. no one else is bidding it up that high.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Who's calling him a backup or a bad QB? He's a good young starting QB.

no he's not tall and because of that he's 7th overall in batted balls at the LOS since 2023. We all know the issues when the weather isn't great as well. Thoughts on why?

without question the team did him no favors last yr. We've all talked about the lack of separation. In 2023 he had guys getting open a lot more which in itself makes passing easier. I think he's accurate. I don't think he's an accurate power thrower, which makes those tight window throws you expect the high level guys to make harder for him. According to PFF he ranked 28th in those tight window throws (throws where there is a yard or less of separation between the defender and target).

All in all, in order for Brock to maintain that 2023 level, he's gonna need a damn good roster to ride on….probably a little more than some of the other highly paid QBs. I don't think that's some shocking thing to point out. Once he's gotten paid and those cap hit starting get real, he's gonna have to elevate what he has around him. SF overall is gonna have to draft much better as well.

In 2023?

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mayo49:
He wouldn't have earn it? Yeah, he would have - hate the game not the player.

So every single player that's earned and extension deserves to be one of the highest paid players at their position. even if they didn't play to that level the yr they were heading into a contract extension?

If BA played all yr this yr and had an avg overall yr. Much worse than last yr, we are still obligated to make him one of the highest paid WRs in football? If you agree I will ask you why?

Your not obligated to do anything, unless he's under contract. If someone gets to the table of anything, then he deserves what he has coming his way.

What

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

But their seasons weren't as good as Brock's 2023.
You undervalue him.

There is zero chance he won't average $50 million per year IMO.

if he gets 50m or some banana deal then we played ourselves, that's all that means. no one else is bidding it up that high.

No one ever bids up QB contracts because they don't hit the FA market.

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mayo49:
He wouldn't have earn it? Yeah, he would have - hate the game not the player.

So every single player that's earned and extension deserves to be one of the highest paid players at their position. even if they didn't play to that level the yr they were heading into a contract extension?

If BA played all yr this yr and had an avg overall yr. Much worse than last yr, we are still obligated to make him one of the highest paid WRs in football? If you agree I will ask you why?

Your not obligated to do anything, unless he's under contract. If someone gets to the table of anything, then he deserves what he has coming his way.

What

Lol, going too fast for yah, ha?

brock does 2 things well, he plays fast and he can move around well to extend plays. on the downside, he throws very slow, soft passes, and it makes the heat map very concentrated in the short or intermediate middle of the field.

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Maybe if Baker could carry everybody in his first few years like you expect from young QBs that wouldn't have happened to him

Most QBs that get paid did it with weapons. We spent 3 firsts thinking we could compete with any qb. It's not that easy

Name me a QB that played great with 4 different HCs in 4 yrs? He avg 3,700 yards and 25tds in those first 3 seasons. I mean yeah the browns are for SURE a well run organization lol.

who the hell are love and Lawrence's weapons? You act like we had some normal team last yr. Pro bowl and all pros at every damn position group. Brock wasn't even the highest voted MVP on his own team.

look man, this is just my opinion clearly…I think he might need more around him then some of the other highly paid guys. It will cost money to make that a thing. hopefully he recognizes that and the deal that is agreed upon isn't some Dak or Burrow type deal, which will force him to do more than he actually can do. Thats all. I don't want him gone. I don't think he sucks or shouldn't be the guy. I like Brock.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Who's calling him a backup or a bad QB? He's a good young starting QB.

no he's not tall and because of that he's 7th overall in batted balls at the LOS since 2023. We all know the issues when the weather isn't great as well. Thoughts on why?

without question the team did him no favors last yr. We've all talked about the lack of separation. In 2023 he had guys getting open a lot more which in itself makes passing easier. I think he's accurate. I don't think he's an accurate power thrower, which makes those tight window throws you expect the high level guys to make harder for him. According to PFF he ranked 28th in those tight window throws (throws where there is a yard or less of separation between the defender and target).

All in all, in order for Brock to maintain that 2023 level, he's gonna need a damn good roster to ride on….probably a little more than some of the other highly paid QBs. I don't think that's some shocking thing to point out. Once he's gotten paid and those cap hit starting get real, he's gonna have to elevate what he has around him. SF overall is gonna have to draft much better as well.

In 2023?

Yes

Originally posted by mayo49:
Your not obligated to do anything, unless he's under contract. If someone gets to the table of anything, then he deserves what he has coming to him.

You didn't answer my question and I have no idea what you even said here.

The 49ers have shown a willingness to pay top dollar for select players. They currently have the highest paid RB and edge rusher as well as #2 LB, #3 TE and #4 WR. Unforunately the RB and WR didn't play this year. Trent Williams wa sthe highest paid tackle before this season. They paid Deebo well and of course JG once was the highest paid QB. This team isn't cheap. I just hope they can sign Brock to a deal that doesn't hurt them long term. Paraag has been good at getting team friendly deals so I hope he can deliver again.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
But their seasons weren't as good as Brock's 2023.
You undervalue him.

There is zero chance he won't average $50 million per year IMO.

if he gets 50m or some banana deal then we played ourselves, that's all that means. no one else is bidding it up that high.

No one ever bids up QB contracts because they don't hit the FA market.

the point is mahomes can get the big money elsewhere. if kc was lowballing he can say ok i'm done with kc, and his agent could demand a trade, and essentially every NFL team would find the cap space to pay mahomes his asking. imo, brock can't do that. teams wouldn't pay brock the $60m or anything like that.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Kolohe:
You don't think he deserves what Dak Prescott got or Joe Burrow?

Absolutely not lol

Why not, Brock Purdy is basically on par with both of them especially if you're comparing their 2023 seasons. But I won't do that to Burrow so I'll use his 2022 season.

Closet hater just as I suspected.