QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Regular season games to playoff games, it takes a team correct. But in those games the QB and HC get the blame for the losses. So if they get the blame shouldn't they get the credit? Why is Tom Brady the GOAT, if it's the team that won them? We both know Brock Purdy was clutch enough to come through with a win.

I'm not saying to overpay for Purdy. But comparing him to Prescott to Burrow to Herbert, no doubt he should be paid that much.

So Jimmy was the reason we won those playoff games? Those packers playoff games? That Viking game? For real?

where was that clutch this yr? Dude was straight up bad in those scenarios. He has zero of those this yr. He's had 2 in the regular season since 2022. Yes he sure as s**t had some of that magic in the playoffs. Mostly with his legs and some BA circus catch to help out.

Again Herbert/burrow/dak have more seasons doing what he did last yr. Ain't nobody taken Brock over burrow and Herbert if you leave this fan forum. Dak is debatable he was also vastly overpaid and we shouldn't follow suit. Brock should not be the highest paid player in the NFL. Period.

Exactly! Some people think that because the Cowboys were stupid enough to overpay for Dak, then we should therefore overpay for Brock.

What Dallas did imo is an example of what NOT to do.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

What are the alternatives to signing Purdy?

I'm not saying don't sign him. I'm saying don't sign him for Dak/Burrow money.

I think the way the love contract is setup that makes the most sense.

So, anything under $200 mil guaranteed?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
you said put him out there to get a price

that didn't happen to Lamar or Dak like you exampled.. Lamar and Dak didn't get any offers and both of those guys signed for top dollar

Baltimore put the non-exclusive tag on Lamar which allowed him to negotiate a contract with other teams so yeah it did happen.

reports said that LV was waiting to see what was happening with Dak and hoped to make a move on him. It was just a report nothing more.

You're argument is not about the tag, it's getting a price from another team which you want to do with Brock

Lamar never got one offer. Does that mean he's not worth it? No

LV is waiting on everyone, that still doesn't mean they offered Dak the same money

not sure what the disconnect here

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
you said put him out there to get a price

that didn't happen to Lamar or Dak like you exampled.. Lamar and Dak didn't get any offers and both of those guys signed for top dollar

In Lamar's case, he was initially asking for a contract to match Watson's. Thats why the Ravens let him shop around.

His contract ended up being 70 million ish less guaranteed.

Cool and all, but that doesn't line up with NYs negotiation tactics.

the only way you can get a price would have to be a serious trade offer to the point where you can actually lose that player and not just for your amusement of testing the market. That's bad business

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
You might not be talking about cap hits and contracts. I sure as s**t am, along with the ability to have a top end roster around him.

Yes it will come down to drafting well because money isn't gonna be flowing like it was when you have a $900k QB. You want to argue with folks about him now…just wait when he gets $200M and the moment he's not playing well.

I bet you can't wait lol

If he plays awesome I'll talk about that all day just like I did all last yr…its like you weren't in this thread all 2023 lol

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You're argument is not about the tag, it's getting a price from another team which you want to do with Brock

Lamar never got one offer. Does that mean he's not worth it? No

LV is waiting on everyone, that still doesn't mean they offered Dak the same money

not sure what the disconnect here

Cool and all, but that doesn't line up with NYs negotiation tactics.

the only way you can get a price would have to be serious trade offer to the point where you can actually lose that player and not just for your amusement of test the market. That's bad business

Not meeting his asking price is in effect getting a price. That's why he signed for less than he originally wanted. It took a dry market first.

Paying on "Potential" is fraught with danger.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You're argument is not about the tag, it's getting a price from another team which you want to do with Brock

Lamar never got one offer. Does that mean he's not worth it? No

LV is waiting on everyone, that still doesn't mean they offered Dak the same money

not sure what the disconnect here

Cool and all, but that doesn't line up with NYs negotiation tactics.

the only way you can get a price would have to be serious trade offer to the point where you can actually lose that player and not just for your amusement of test the market. That's bad business

Not meeting his asking price is in effect getting a price. That's why he signed for less than he originally wanted. It took a dry market first.

No one gets their first asking price, that doesn't mean the market is dry

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No one gets their first asking price, that doesn't mean the market is dry

Lol, dear lord. The market is dry at his asking price and considering the trade assets. This worked to the Ravens advantage.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No one gets their first asking price, that doesn't mean the market is dry

Lol, dear lord. The market is dry at his asking price and considering the trade assets. This worked to the Ravens advantage.

You're getting close now.. money and draft compensation play a factor to whatever player getting less also

no one is going to pay you more money, if they know you want to get rid of it

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You're getting close now.. money and draft compensation play a factor to whatever player getting less also

no one is going to pay you more money, if they know you want to get rid of it

Tell me how this makes any sense at all when he is tagged?

It doesn't.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Regular season games to playoff games, it takes a team correct. But in those games the QB and HC get the blame for the losses. So if they get the blame shouldn't they get the credit? Why is Tom Brady the GOAT, if it's the team that won them? We both know Brock Purdy was clutch enough to come through with a win.

I'm not saying to overpay for Purdy. But comparing him to Prescott to Burrow to Herbert, no doubt he should be paid that much.

So Jimmy was the reason we won those playoff games? Those packers playoff games? That Viking game? For real?

where was that clutch this yr? Dude was straight up bad in those scenarios. He has zero of those this yr. He's had 2 in the regular season since 2022. Yes he sure as s**t had some of that magic in the playoffs. Mostly with his legs and some BA circus catch to help out.

Again Herbert/burrow/dak have more seasons doing what he did last yr. Ain't nobody taken Brock over burrow and Herbert if you leave this fan forum. Dak is debatable he was also vastly overpaid and we shouldn't follow suit. Brock should not be the highest paid player in the NFL. Period.

Yes Jimmy should get credit for those playoff wins. Being the reason for those wins are two completely different subjects. Doesn't Nick Foles have a Super Bowl yes or no? Was Foles the reason for the win, again different subject.

And are you really gonna discount all the injuries this team took this year? The clutch was there this year, was he not clutch in the wins in Seattle, vs Detroit, vs Tampa, vs LA in LA.
Are we gonna sit here and say Brock is the reason SF had a bad season?

The QB's mentioned that had more seasons than Brock Purdy is irrelevant. The fact of the matter at hand is has Brock Purdy been successful, has he been productive, has he been a big part of the teams success. All those answers are yes, so he should be paid as such. And saying no one would take one QB over the other is also irrelevant, you don't know what teams are thinking or who they see fit, you're basing things off fans perspective, which is also irrelevant.

The team will pay Brock Purdy, and they will of course protect themselves as much as they can from his contract. People getting all bent outta shape need to remember that.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Paying on "Potential" is fraught with danger.

Don't they do that with draft picks every year??

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
What are the alternatives to signing Purdy?

I'm not saying don't sign him. I'm saying don't sign him for Dak/Burrow money.

I think the way the love contract is setup that makes the most sense.

So, anything under $200 mil guaranteed?

As far as I can tell it's essentially a 3 yrs $163M deal and reasonable cap hits.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You're getting close now.. money and draft compensation play a factor to whatever player getting less also

no one is going to pay you more money, if they know you want to get rid of it

Deshaun Watson says hi… So does Matt Stafford.

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Don't they do that with draft picks every year??

Rookie pay scale