Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:lombardi is a fool. this doesn't help us with negotiations.
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
There are 295 users in the forums
QB Brock Purdy Thread
QB Brock Purdy Thread
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:14 PM
- CharlieSheen
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,341
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:14 PM
- Furlow
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,373
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Furlow:
I was speaking to the group of "you" who want to play hardball and say that Purdy has little/no leverage.
In a reply to you I described playing 'hardball' as a gamble. That should have been a clear indication of the belief that Purdy has leverage, let alone the fact at no point did I ever say, or indicate, that he didn't.*
I added little. Perhaps I'm wrong and you think Purdy does indeed have leverage. If that's the case then why would you think playing hardball would work?
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:15 PM
- SmokeyJoe
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,187
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:16 PM
- Furlow
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,373
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Furlow:
I was speaking to the group of "you" who want to play hardball and say that Purdy has little/no leverage.
i don't think purdy has much leverage. what's he gonna do, pull a leveon bell? i don't see it.
he wants to get in and play ball. offer the 200m over 5, he will accept and it's a win for both. from 900k to 40,000,000 annual, that's how you know you made it. if you type out all the zeroes, it look bigger.
Okay so he's not going to accept that, because it's well below QB's who he's much better than. So what is your plan at QB when Purdy holds out? Which FA are you bringing in and/or who are you drafting to replace Purdy?
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:17 PM
- RonnieLott
- Member
- Posts: 1,669
We don't want to be caught with a long-term contract for a player who is regressing each year since his 1 Superbowl appearance..
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:18 PM
- Furlow
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,373
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
While playing clips of Love, Herbert, and Darnold from this weekend.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:18 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 112,245
Originally posted by Furlow:
I was speaking to the group of "you" who want to play hardball and say that Purdy has little/no leverage.
He doesn't have as much leverage as you think. Brock would be the one playing "hardball" if he wants to be the highest paid player in the league
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:18 PM
- SmokeyJoe
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,187
Originally posted by Furlow:
I added little. Perhaps I'm wrong and you think Purdy does indeed have leverage. If that's the case then why would you think playing hardball would work?
No, I'm lying to you and I really don't think Purdy has leverage. Also 'hardball' can't possibly work unless a party has no leverage. Pretty dumb.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:19 PM
- DRCHOWDER
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,829
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
While playing clips of Love, Herbert, and Darnold from this weekend.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:19 PM
- Furlow
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,373
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
We don't want to be caught with a long-term contract for a player who is regressing each year since his 1 Superbowl appearance..
Which of the FA QB's would you sign and/or who would you take in the draft to replace Purdy?
One of you needs to answer this or else it's just emotional wishful thinking/hoping that he signs for some absurd number like $30m-$40m per.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:19 PM
- CharlieSheen
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,341
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:Originally posted by CharlieSheen:It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
I'm just pointing out the number isn't foolish. It's close based on the market
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:19 PM
- SmokeyJoe
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,187
Originally posted by Furlow:
While playing clips of Love, Herbert, and Darnold from this weekend.
Put the fries in the bag.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:19 PM
- Furlow
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,373
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
While playing clips of Love, Herbert, and Darnold from this weekend.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:20 PM
- 49erFaithful6
- Veteran
- Posts: 37,173
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Furlow:
I was speaking to the group of "you" who want to play hardball and say that Purdy has little/no leverage.
i don't think purdy has much leverage. what's he gonna do, pull a leveon bell? i don't see it.
he wants to get in and play ball. offer the 200m over 5, he will accept and it's a win for both. from 900k to 40,000,000 annual, that's how you know you made it. if you type out all the zeroes, it look bigger.
Okay so he's not going to accept that, because it's well below QB's who he's much better than. So what is your plan at QB when Purdy holds out? Which FA are you bringing in and/or who are you drafting to replace Purdy?
i think he would take it. in what world is pick 262, getting 200m and generational wealth, not a win? imagine if he doesn't take it and we actually had stones, ok, we go with plan B and brock is dangling in the breeze (no pun intended). he would be missing his game checks on a 900k salary, and sitting out and becoming yesterday's news. he'd never get that 200m back. he just has more to lose than SF does.
Jan 15, 2025 at 4:21 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 112,245
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
It's only like 1 mil more per year than the spotrac projection
I'm picturing Purdy's agent printing out Spotrac's projection and slamming it down on a desk in front of Paraag, lol.
While playing clips of Love, Herbert, and Darnold from this weekend.
That looks like us watching this team all yr