QB Brock Purdy Thread

It's about that time of the hour, folks. The know-it-all hour. Let's see who shows up.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
You are more active after a bad game. You were the type to start b***hing in the game thread way too early, but you learned your lesson on that. You are always ready to jump down his throat for obvious reasons. Instead of constantly insinuating that everything will fall apart if we give Brock money, just come out and say you don't believe in the kid. Stop acting like you do

Talk about exaggerating….whenever ANYONE plays poorly ALL those threads are pumping out comments. That's how it's always been.

I have a years worth of posts in this thread with mostly positive s**t in it….its all there.

For the 100th tim…. all I've said is don't pay him a Dak or borrow level contract. I said the Love deal makes sense. You're so fixated at trying to find a gotcha moment that completely miss the point of my posts. I can't be more blunt about it to you anymore. Quit trying to gaslight me, ain't gonna work.

And YES whenever you push in hundreds of millions of dollars to one player that DOES change how you build a roster. Thats f**king common sense. Yet here I am trying to explain it to you while you have a toddler temper tantrum because you don't think I "like" someone as much as you

It was clearly broken down in here that the Love and Dak deals aren't far apart. Dak simply had money carried over from his previous deal. And Dak's bad deal could have been avoided if the Cowboys extended him early. But they waited, and are now paying more. Which coincidentally you and others are saying to do. Bottom line is we either decide he's our guy and pay him now or trade him.

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Had to check twice make sure I clicked the Brock Purdy thread.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Had to check twice make sure I clicked the Brock Purdy thread.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
And yet, we won't have ANY of that once Purdy's big extension kicks in. So what exactly are you worried about? In 2027, we won't have Trent. In 2027, we won't have CMC unless he takes a massive paycut. In 2027, Bosa won't be top 5 at his position. In 2027, Warner won't be top 5 at his position. In 2027, Aiyuk wont be top 5 at his position. In 2027, Hargrave won't be on the team.

People acting like Brock's extension means we will have a bunch of scrubs around him are worrying about nothing.

Have any what? Good talent…yeah you're right lol. SO how do you go about that and STILL make runs at SBs? You gotta draft absurdly well, especially in the early rounds…I wouldn't say SF has been ideal at that AND you need to pay for talent. That's just a fact.

folks b***hed all yr about the OL/DL/WRs/secondary and LBer groups all sucking. We've gone around in circles about how that was the only reason Brock didn't play like he did in 2023. So let's pay him a quarter billion dollars and figure out a way to piece together a roster that will be "good enough" for Brock to play like he did in 2023. Okay got it.

I'm gonna add the only thing I'm debating is paying him Dak/burrow level money. That is not a fluffed up contract with fake void yrs and bloated backend cap hits with no GTD cash. If you think he deserves/is a smart business decision I will disagree all day. Now if we're talking about a Love like deal, I'm fine with it.

for once can you people in here just read what I wrote (not necessarily you) and process it properly? Put your emotions of a player & your conspiracy theories about me aside. Ya'll will find out I don't dislike Brock and I'm just looking at it from a total team standpoint.

Dak's contract was already explained to you and you ignored it. Burrow's cap hit looks like it will be massive in 2028-2029. I will bet you whatever you want that his contract is restructured before it ever really gets to thst point. That is literally how the NFL works.

So again, you are ignoring details about Daks contract that explains why it is what it is (that would be impossible for Purdy's to be the same). And ignoring that almost every franchise QB doesn't simply play out the entirety of a contract with massive cap hits at the end of it rather than get restructured/extended again to help the cap.

Originally posted by Furlow:
It was clearly broken down in here that the Love and Dak deals aren't far apart. Dak simply had money carried over from his previous deal. And Dak's bad deal could have been avoided if the Cowboys extended him early. But they waited, and are now paying more. Which coincidentally you and others are saying to do. Bottom line is we either decide he's our guy and pay him now or trade him.

Who broke it down?

they are not close to the same. Dak has practical guarantees of $230M+, love is $160M. From what I remember Dak was in the last yr of his deal and has no GTD cash left. Not sure what he was carrying over?

Dak's cap hit this next 3 yrs

$90M, $68M, $62M before they can think about moving on.

love's cap hit the next 3 yrs

$29M, $36M, $42M (and they can move on that season).

Also the difference with those two is they got paid coming of one of their best seasons.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Dak's contract was already explained to you and you ignored it. Burrow's cap hit looks like it will be massive in 2028-2029. I will bet you whatever you want that his contract is restructured before it ever really gets to thst point. That is literally how the NFL works.

So again, you are ignoring details about Daks contract that explains why it is what it is (that would be impossible for Purdy's to be the same). And ignoring that almost every franchise QB doesn't simply play out the entirety of a contract with massive cap hits at the end of it rather than get restructured/extended again to help the cap.

Ignored it? I live in NY it's like 12:30 when that got posted (I just looked back).

$230M in practical gtds is not the same as $160M in practical gtds.

their cap hits the next 3 yrs are not remotely the same. From what I read he didn't have much GTD cash left on the last yr of his deal that amount to some crazy carryover? Maybe I've miss read there.

Of course burrow will be restructured. He's a young elite level QB in the league. Brock is gonna have to get to that type of consistency for SF to restructure. If not it's a problem.

gaslighting
noun

• the practice of psychologically manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning.

Can we stop with the pseudointellectualism?

Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
gaslighting
noun

• the practice of psychologically manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning.

Can we stop with the pseudointellectualism?

In other words, enough with the Shanaghan's.

Dak got 95% Gtd
Love got 72% Gtd
Joe B 79%
49ers Jimmy G 54%

from our past signings and jimmy Gs extension. I don't think Brock will get a high % in Gtd money

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dak got 95% Gtd
Love got 72% Gtd
Joe B 79%
49ers Jimmy G 54%

from our past signings and jimmy Gs extension. I don't think Brock will get a high % in Gtd money

I think that's where it should be at. Again just my opinion

Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
gaslighting
noun

• the practice of psychologically manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning.

Can we stop with the pseudointellectualism?

I think everyone in here can stop with the pseudo-intellectualism. Not just one person.

it's the return of the glass half full, glass half empty qb thread we all know and love. this is where you get the good debates

how about 5 years 200m; and we rename to the Iowa.comCornBowl Stadium to sweeten the deal

Dirty is my quarterback.