Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
This ongoing argument over Brock's ability is silly. It's not an great vs bust argument. I hasven't seen many people say he's terrible. Most of his criticsa merely point out some of his deficiencies. It doesn't mean he's sucks or can't win. He's shown he's good enough in the right circumstances.
Fans that love Brock should accept him for what he is and stop trying to make him into a top 5 QB. His physical limitations are always going to be there. Hopefully his strong points will continue to overcome the lack of any physical abilities.
Who here has claimed he's a top 5 QB?
And the so called "critics" pointing out his deficiencies for stupid reasons. QBs don't get paid per arm strength. There isn't a pricing chart for size.
QBs get paid for their accomplishments and how they play within the team willing to pay them and what the team believes they can do moving forward.
The bulk of the conversation lately has been "he's not good enough to pay big money" and that's when posters try to point out how he's not Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, etc as if that has anything to do with how things work in the NFL.
If we're here to play dumb then I guess let's keep it going. I'm sure the 49ers will check our posts to figure out whether Brock is worth paying...or you know they'll trust their inside knowledge of what Brock is or isn't and what he can or cannot do in this offense.
However odds are that the people in here fighting tooth and nail to claim Brock isn't worth a new deal will be here coping in a month or two when the deal is done for the very simple reason - we have nobody better and nobody better available to get. When that happens - you pay.