QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Yes the whole team believing in him means nothing lol ok my man

The public statements mean nothing when it comes down to the details of the contract. Try to understand what I'm saying. They can believe in him and still hedge their bets, and I think they probably will as much as they can.

Having the team and coaching staff behind him does factor in. The atypical statements are just proof we have as fans of how much they are behind him. Parag will do his job because nobody can predict the future, but don't try to compare their praise of Trey to their praise of Brock. It not the same

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Having the team and coaching staff behind him does factor in. The atypical statements are just proof we have as fans of how much they are behind him. Parag will do his job because nobody can predict the future, but don't try to compare their praise of Trey to their praise of Brock. It not the same

I wasn't comparing the substance of their statements. I was saying they don't mean anything. Also I paired the substance of their statements in the context of support of fan arguments. Your post was an example of that… you used statements by the team in conjunction with your conclusion about his film.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Having the team and coaching staff behind him does factor in. The atypical statements are just proof we have as fans of how much they are behind him. Parag will do his job because nobody can predict the future, but don't try to compare their praise of Trey to their praise of Brock. It not the same

I wasn't comparing the substance of their statements. I was saying they don't mean anything. Also I paired the substance of their statements in the context of support of fan arguments. Your post was an example of that… you used statements by the team in conjunction with your conclusion about his film.

I said his film is why they say what they say

Not his film is good because they say good things

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
I said his film is why they say what they say

Not his film is good because they say good things

Yes you did exactly what I said. You paired their statements with your conclusion about the film. The statements are more credible to you because of your personal opinion about the player. This happened incessantly in the Trey debates from other people, when it was obviously wrong. This time it's not as clear.

I'll be honest, I hope we don't give Brock a short Daniel jones like contract cause that will be more restrictive on the salary cap.

Will be interesting if they give him a 3 year extension and spread the money out. That might give Brock extra motivation but who knows.

it could be best for Brock if he balls out. It would maximize his money. It can also benefit the team if they want to move on from him.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

I said his film is why they say what they say

Not his film is good because they say good things

Yes you did exactly what I said. You paired their statements with your conclusion about the film. The statements are more credible to you because of your personal opinion about the player. This happened incessantly in the Trey debates from other people, when it was obviously wrong. This time it's not as clear.

My conclusion about his film has nothing to do with their statements. I just said his film is why they say what they say

The statements are more credible because they are different this time, and extremely high praise at that. If it was the same crap as before it wouldn't mean anything to me

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
My conclusion about his film has nothing to do with their statements. I just said his film is why they say what they say

The statements are more credible because they are different this time, and extremely high praise at that. If it was the same crap as before it wouldn't mean anything to me

Lol, you just don't want to put this point together I guess. I understand your conclusion about the film has nothing to do with their statements. I'm saying your personal opinion about the player is coloring the credibility you give to their statements. That is happening in this thread and happened in the Trey arguments. For example, in the Trey arguments many people believed he was a viable future franchise QB, based on their own evaluation or a limited set of statistics, and when they paired this belief with the things Kyle and John said publicly, it became impossible to convince them the team may actually feel differently (when they obviously did and it was eventually shown).

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

My conclusion about his film has nothing to do with their statements. I just said his film is why they say what they say

The statements are more credible because they are different this time, and extremely high praise at that. If it was the same crap as before it wouldn't mean anything to me

Lol, you just don't want to put this point together I guess. I understand your conclusion about the film has nothing to do with their statements. I'm saying your personal opinion about the player is coloring the credibility you give to their statements. That is happening in this thread and happened in the Trey arguments. For example, in the Trey arguments many people believed he was a viable future franchise QB, based on their own evaluation or a limited set of statistics, and when they paired this belief with the things Kyle and John said publicly, it became impossible to convince them the team may actually feel differently (when they obviously did and it was eventually shown).

I told you why I think it's different this time, and you still want to believe otherwise. Oh well