QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by njninersfan420:
Sick of this narrative from talking heads that this is the best defense that purdy will face and are expecting him to fall flat on his face. Can't wait for him to shut people up sunday, but they will just move the goalposts again saying he can't beat philly . These bozos should be more talking dak making mistakes against our defense (qb that lead the league in ints despite missing 5 games vs defense with most ints in the league)

dak s**t the bed vs washington, the same defense purdy put up 30+ on

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by boast:
it's funny how bringing up a W/L is so triggering to some.

For real.. it's part of the equation for evaluating QBs. NFL clubs do it all the time. The more we win with Brock the harder it will be for the actual club to move away from starting him. We all know this.

It's HOW you win that matters.

W/L is only relevant if you pass the eye test. Since the SB vs the Chiefs Jimmy has not passed the eye test so W/L means far less.

Brock is playing at an elite level and is PLAYMAKING. So the wins he gets credit for as he has been the reason we are scoring 35+ points in our sleep and passes the eye test.

If Brock was winning but playing no different from Jimmy his ass would def be on the bench next year. But he is playing far better than Jimmy and at an elite level and that is why there is talk of him and franchise qb going forward etc.

The eye test is what people cite when there is no evidence

The eye test IS evidence.

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by boast:
it's funny how bringing up a W/L is so triggering to some.

For real.. it's part of the equation for evaluating QBs. NFL clubs do it all the time. The more we win with Brock the harder it will be for the actual club to move away from starting him. We all know this.

It's HOW you win that matters.

W/L is only relevant if you pass the eye test. Since the SB vs the Chiefs Jimmy has not passed the eye test so W/L means far less.

Brock is playing at an elite level and is PLAYMAKING. So the wins he gets credit for as he has been the reason we are scoring 35+ points in our sleep and passes the eye test.

If Brock was winning but playing no different from Jimmy his ass would def be on the bench next year. But he is playing far better than Jimmy and at an elite level and that is why there is talk of him and franchise qb going forward etc.

The eye test is what people cite when there is no evidence

The eye test IS evidence.

If you know what you're looking at.

The thing with Joe Montana is even when he made mistakes, it didn't rattle him. An interception? No big deal. A fumble? Not a problem. Joe kept his focus on the present, not what happened five minutes ago. He was the epitome of cool under pressure. I see elements of that in Purdy's play. Whether the kid wins a Super Bowl or not doesn't change the similarities I see in that respect. Being a witness of Joe Montana and the glory days only gives me more enjoyment to watch this season unfold. The kid will stumble, at some point they all do - Jim Kelly, Dan Marino, John Elway, Peyton Manning. I just hope it's not until next season.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by boast:
it's funny how bringing up a W/L is so triggering to some.

For real.. it's part of the equation for evaluating QBs. NFL clubs do it all the time. The more we win with Brock the harder it will be for the actual club to move away from starting him. We all know this.

It's HOW you win that matters.

W/L is only relevant if you pass the eye test. Since the SB vs the Chiefs Jimmy has not passed the eye test so W/L means far less.

Brock is playing at an elite level and is PLAYMAKING. So the wins he gets credit for as he has been the reason we are scoring 35+ points in our sleep and passes the eye test.

If Brock was winning but playing no different from Jimmy his ass would def be on the bench next year. But he is playing far better than Jimmy and at an elite level and that is why there is talk of him and franchise qb going forward etc.

The eye test is what people cite when there is no evidence

The eye test IS evidence.

If you know what you're looking at.

Even if you only half know what you are looking at.

First play where he had both Aiyuk for a walk in or a wide open Deebo. I pin this one on nerves. Excuse the play and rewind button in the middle of the screen. I'm not sure how to get rid of it while the video is paused.

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
First play where he had both Aiyuk for a walk in or a wide open Deebo. I pin this one on nerves.

I say that and maybe a little wetness from the ball. Since it started to dry up once the game started.

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
First play where he had both Aiyuk for a walk in or a wide open Deebo. I pin this one on nerves. Excuse the play and rewind button in the middle of the screen. I'm not sure how to get rid of it while the video is paused.

Yeah, this kind of stuff will be fixed with time. The more reps he gets, the more comfortable he will become and start hitting these kind of plays.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
I say that and maybe a little wetness from the ball. Since it started to dry up once the game started.

Yea. Purdy even said wet ball impacted his first few throws. But it was all fine after that.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
I remember this play towards the end of the first half, this is an example where he needs to be more willing to move up in the pocket rather than head to the outside. Its one thing that he is going to need to work on over time. Stepping up in this case and taking an extra second to scan the field could have resulted in a touchdown instead of a throw away.

On this play, Kittle ran a divide route right down the middle of the defense, but he was likely an "alert," meaning Purdy would only look at him if he liked the pre-snap look or peeked at him after the snap.

Purdy's first read is McCaffrey on the choice route, followed by Jennings running a stick China route.

After the snap, free safety Quandre Diggs left the middle and jumped outside. He might have thought Kittle was going to run a corner route and guessed wrong. Kittle was wide open down the middle of the field, but Purdy didn't see him.

Based on the pre-snap look, it might have been difficult to predict Kittle breaking wide open. Purdy looked to McCaffrey, but the "lurk" defender helped on McCaffrey.

Purdy seemed to look to his next read, Jennings, but didn't pull the trigger. Purdy had a clean pocket and plenty of room to step up but instead ran backward, bailed to his left and eventually threw the ball away.

https://theathletic.com/4091165/2023/01/17/brock-purdy-49ers-playoffs-film/

Nice review of the play. Definitely left some big plays out there.

I'm just happy we can review negative plays without immediate push back from the "hate police"

Originally posted by kdoggie:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
I say that and maybe a little wetness from the ball. Since it started to dry up once the game started.

Yea. Purdy even said wet ball impacted his first few throws. But it was all fine after that.

Yup wet ball, moving on

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
dak s**t the bed vs washington, the same defense purdy put up 30+ on

Its a fair point but football doesn't work that way. Purdy doing well vs commanders & dak doing bad doesn't mean we will then blow out the cowboys.

Weird stuff happens in football and one play on any game can send the game in different directions. I have confidence in shanahan/ryans putting our players in a position to succeed and so far our players have executed so ...

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by njninersfan420:
Sick of this narrative from talking heads that this is the best defense that purdy will face and are expecting him to fall flat on his face. Can't wait for him to shut people up sunday, but they will just move the goalposts again saying he can't beat philly . These bozos should be more talking dak making mistakes against our defense (qb that lead the league in ints despite missing 5 games vs defense with most ints in the league)

dak s**t the bed vs washington, the same defense purdy put up 30+ on

Yeppp, we dropped 37 on them and Dallas put up a whopping 6 points

Originally posted by Goatie:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by boast:
it's funny how bringing up a W/L is so triggering to some.

For real.. it's part of the equation for evaluating QBs. NFL clubs do it all the time. The more we win with Brock the harder it will be for the actual club to move away from starting him. We all know this.

It's HOW you win that matters.

W/L is only relevant if you pass the eye test. Since the SB vs the Chiefs Jimmy has not passed the eye test so W/L means far less.

Brock is playing at an elite level and is PLAYMAKING. So the wins he gets credit for as he has been the reason we are scoring 35+ points in our sleep and passes the eye test.

If Brock was winning but playing no different from Jimmy his ass would def be on the bench next year. But he is playing far better than Jimmy and at an elite level and that is why there is talk of him and franchise qb going forward etc.

The eye test is what people cite when there is no evidence

The eye test IS evidence.

If you know what you're looking at.

Even if you only half know what you are looking at.

Woo likes to watch with his eyes close, leave him alone