QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by random49er:
Oh boy. LoL. Only thing I can ration is that there are a handful here that miss that "Us. vs. Them" stuff from Jimmy's thread,...and are trying to recreate it here in this one, even though pretty much everyone is onboard and enjoying the postseason.



Admitting that he's not among the most talented QBs in the game has somehow became a crime, because, what else we gonna gripe and argue about?

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:
Let's talk football

Such a violent celebration.

I think this one is a hybrid of the "six shooter" and "ice in his veins." Maybe he's just doing them both together now lol.

That is a DISGUSTING act by Brock Purdy and we apologize for showing it on our broadcast

- Joe Buck (probably)

I prefer the celebration where he is shooting H in his arm. Have to let the kids know that he doesn't mess around!

I like all of them.

Keep them up.

As long as he is shooting up AFTER the TD 😈

haha right?

In a weird way his post TD hype really helps this team and his station among his peers.

Originally posted by Silky:
I came in here to rant about Chris Simms. You see this new article where he calls Purdy a "lesser Mac Jones?" He goes on to say "This is why I pounded my fist for Mac Jones in the first place!"

This dude cannot let it go. He wants to be so right about this topic. How about Purdy is a better Mac Jones? Mac isn't as mobile either. I hate that dude

Sorry if it's been talked about already
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/chris-simms-discounts-brock-purdy-17723724.php

Originally posted by Silky:
I came in here to rant about Chris Simms. You see this new article where he calls Purdy a "lesser Mac Jones?" He goes on to say "This is why I pounded my fist for Mac Jones in the first place!"

This dude cannot let it go. He wants to be so right about this topic. How about Purdy is a better Mac Jones? Mac isn't as mobile either. I hate that dude

Sorry if it's been talked about already
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/chris-simms-discounts-brock-purdy-17723724.php

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:
Let's talk football

Such a violent celebration.

I think this one is a hybrid of the "six shooter" and "ice in his veins." Maybe he's just doing them both together now lol.

That is a DISGUSTING act by Brock Purdy and we apologize for showing it on our broadcast

- Joe Buck (probably)

I prefer the celebration where he is shooting H in his arm. Have to let the kids know that he doesn't mess around!

I like all of them.

Keep them up.

Why is this okay but if a player fired off a few rounds from his air machine gun it'd be frowned upon? I'd like to see Brock adopt a sideways tilt when using his air pistol to look more gangsta.
Gang Bang Niner Bang Bang!

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Crown:
everything is offensive i guess.

that said I dont like my kids even pointing finger air guns at people.

As a gun owner i heavily preach and teach gun safety.

Perhaps its that?

IDK.

I was just being dumb. You weren't supposed to respond.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:
Let's talk football

Such a violent celebration.

I think this one is a hybrid of the "six shooter" and "ice in his veins." Maybe he's just doing them both together now lol.

That is a DISGUSTING act by Brock Purdy and we apologize for showing it on our broadcast

- Joe Buck (probably)

I prefer the celebration where he is shooting H in his arm. Have to let the kids know that he doesn't mess around!

I like all of them.

Keep them up.

As long as he is shooting up AFTER the TD 😈

haha right?

In a weird way his post TD hype really helps this team and his station among his peers.

Yeah, players definitely feed off of that. They love to see their qb express themselves like that.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Silky:
I came in here to rant about Chris Simms. You see this new article where he calls Purdy a "lesser Mac Jones?" He goes on to say "This is why I pounded my fist for Mac Jones in the first place!"

This dude cannot let it go. He wants to be so right about this topic. How about Purdy is a better Mac Jones? Mac isn't as mobile either. I hate that dude

Sorry if it's been talked about already
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/chris-simms-discounts-brock-purdy-17723724.php

He doubled down yesterday on it in a video. He said he believes mac Jones is better than Purdy. Which, I disagree with but I'm sure his answer will be that he needs to see Purdy play well over a season or two before saying he's better when mac.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Everyone calls w-l records a qb stat.

1st of all, this is a lie, and an entirely subjective statement,...as "everyone" doesn't "call" it anything

And even if they did, relying on what people "call" something admits that your argument is horribly flawed and flies right in the face of what u were arguing regarding "subjectivity."

I thought you were more interested in black and white facts?

There are about 22 guys contributing on both sides of the ball to your team's success. Not talking articles or clicks,....just talking reality. A corner blowing coverage twice can easily lead to a loss and 14 points the other way.

The fact is that wins and losses are a team stat, but do you see how fast you threw your lust for facts right out the window? I saw it coming a mile away.

My thesis is coming @ the end instead of the beginning,...but clearly, the evidence above shows that you gravitate to a couple numbers you like so you can make grandiose statements, whether they make sense or not. And you want to then use "numbers" to back them up because you can't argue "facts",...right?

If a guy is 50-10 as a starting QB, he's 50-10 as a starting QB. I hate to tell you this, but that is where the facts begin and end with that statement. No argument is included in it.

Nah a vast majority of people give wins to QBs. You guys are just being difficult imo. Just a quick Google of "QB wins" shows that it is a very very well known stat throughout all platforms of media. Even look at Super Bowls and how guys like Montana ad Brady are known for wins.

the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.

Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)

No..

where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?

and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?

Where's QBR on that link?

OMG it's not there, what shall we do

I don't know, you tell us. You're the one that set the standard that the only "real" stats are on NFL.com.

where did i say QBR has to be thee stat.. ?

if you read, i said that's why ratings and QBR were created to help with QB play.. not a stat

"the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.
Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)."

"where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?
and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?"

is this supposed to be a gotcha moment, quoting why i said ratings were created lol ?

You said that W/L isn't a stat for QB's, because NFL.com doesn't have it.

NFL.com does not have QBR either, yet you cite it regularly (and in this same argument).

so i can't say why Ratings were created ? because that is all i said

Oh cool you're trying to change the subject. K

W/L record is a a TEAM STAT.

W/L record as a starter is a QB stat, DL stat, OL stat, RB stat, etc.

No player in the NFL has a W/L record, though. Well maybe Gronk did and Kittle will because they're into that fake wrestling stuff.

There is W/L record as a participant and W/L record as a bench player that never entered the game as well. So what? Onlookers have the right to "record" whatever they want.

W/L record is still a team stat, and a team stat only. Until football rules gets rid of the other 20 players on the field, it will continue to be this way.

I mean do you want more myths?

It's not really year 2023, because the Earth is billions of yrs old.
Bulls don't really get mad when they "see" red, George Washington didnt really have wooden teeth, and bats aren't really blind.

I mean we can go on forever, lol.

Originally posted by Memphis9er:

Originally posted by random49er:
Oh boy. LoL. Only thing I can ration is that there are a handful here that miss that "Us. vs. Them" stuff from Jimmy's thread,...and are trying to recreate it here in this one, even though pretty much everyone is onboard and enjoying the postseason.



Admitting that he's not among the most talented QBs in the game has somehow became a crime, because, what else we gonna gripe and argue about?

You would've hated Montana if they had these charts on him, lol. His was probably like this one minus the 95th percentile on ten yard split.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Everyone calls w-l records a qb stat.

1st of all, this is a lie, and an entirely subjective statement,...as "everyone" doesn't "call" it anything

And even if they did, relying on what people "call" something admits that your argument is horribly flawed and flies right in the face of what u were arguing regarding "subjectivity."

I thought you were more interested in black and white facts?

There are about 22 guys contributing on both sides of the ball to your team's success. Not talking articles or clicks,....just talking reality. A corner blowing coverage twice can easily lead to a loss and 14 points the other way.

The fact is that wins and losses are a team stat, but do you see how fast you threw your lust for facts right out the window? I saw it coming a mile away.

My thesis is coming @ the end instead of the beginning,...but clearly, the evidence above shows that you gravitate to a couple numbers you like so you can make grandiose statements, whether they make sense or not. And you want to then use "numbers" to back them up because you can't argue "facts",...right?

If a guy is 50-10 as a starting QB, he's 50-10 as a starting QB. I hate to tell you this, but that is where the facts begin and end with that statement. No argument is included in it.

Nah a vast majority of people give wins to QBs. You guys are just being difficult imo. Just a quick Google of "QB wins" shows that it is a very very well known stat throughout all platforms of media. Even look at Super Bowls and how guys like Montana ad Brady are known for wins.

the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.

Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)

No..

where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?

and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?

Where's QBR on that link?

OMG it's not there, what shall we do

I don't know, you tell us. You're the one that set the standard that the only "real" stats are on NFL.com.

where did i say QBR has to be thee stat.. ?

if you read, i said that's why ratings and QBR were created to help with QB play.. not a stat

"the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.
Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)."

"where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?
and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?"

is this supposed to be a gotcha moment, quoting why i said ratings were created lol ?

You said that W/L isn't a stat for QB's, because NFL.com doesn't have it.

NFL.com does not have QBR either, yet you cite it regularly (and in this same argument).

so i can't say why Ratings were created ? because that is all i said

Oh cool you're trying to change the subject. K

W/L record is a a TEAM STAT.

W/L record as a starter is a QB stat, DL stat, OL stat, RB stat, etc.

No player in the NFL has a W/L record, though. Well maybe Gronk did and Kittle will because they're into that fake wrestling stuff.

There is W/L record as a participant and W/L record as a bench player that never entered the game as well. So what? Onlookers have the right to "record" whatever they want.

W/L record is still a team stat, and a team stat only. Until football rules gets rid of the other 20 players on the field, it will continue to be this way.

I mean do you want more myths?

It's not really year 2023, because the Earth is billions of yrs old.
Bulls don't really get mad when they "see" red, George Washington didnt really have wooden teeth, and bats aren't really blind.

I mean we can go on forever, lol.

Virtuslly all of the statistical record keepers in the NFL have tracked w-l for qbs and bot for any other players. Street and Smiths, Sporting News, Pro Football Weekly etc.

Your beef is with them.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by thl408:
Let's talk football

Such a violent celebration.

I think this one is a hybrid of the "six shooter" and "ice in his veins." Maybe he's just doing them both together now lol.

That is a DISGUSTING act by Brock Purdy and we apologize for showing it on our broadcast

- Joe Buck (probably)

I prefer the celebration where he is shooting H in his arm. Have to let the kids know that he doesn't mess around!

I like all of them.

Keep them up.

As long as he is shooting up AFTER the TD 😈

haha right?

In a weird way his post TD hype really helps this team and his station among his peers.

Yeah, players definitely feed off of that. They love to see their qb express themselves like that.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Everyone calls w-l records a qb stat.

1st of all, this is a lie, and an entirely subjective statement,...as "everyone" doesn't "call" it anything

And even if they did, relying on what people "call" something admits that your argument is horribly flawed and flies right in the face of what u were arguing regarding "subjectivity."

I thought you were more interested in black and white facts?

There are about 22 guys contributing on both sides of the ball to your team's success. Not talking articles or clicks,....just talking reality. A corner blowing coverage twice can easily lead to a loss and 14 points the other way.

The fact is that wins and losses are a team stat, but do you see how fast you threw your lust for facts right out the window? I saw it coming a mile away.

My thesis is coming @ the end instead of the beginning,...but clearly, the evidence above shows that you gravitate to a couple numbers you like so you can make grandiose statements, whether they make sense or not. And you want to then use "numbers" to back them up because you can't argue "facts",...right?

If a guy is 50-10 as a starting QB, he's 50-10 as a starting QB. I hate to tell you this, but that is where the facts begin and end with that statement. No argument is included in it.

Nah a vast majority of people give wins to QBs. You guys are just being difficult imo. Just a quick Google of "QB wins" shows that it is a very very well known stat throughout all platforms of media. Even look at Super Bowls and how guys like Montana ad Brady are known for wins.

the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.

Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)

No..

where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?

and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?

Where's QBR on that link?

OMG it's not there, what shall we do

I don't know, you tell us. You're the one that set the standard that the only "real" stats are on NFL.com.

where did i say QBR has to be thee stat.. ?

if you read, i said that's why ratings and QBR were created to help with QB play.. not a stat

"the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.
Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)."

"where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?
and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?"

is this supposed to be a gotcha moment, quoting why i said ratings were created lol ?

You said that W/L isn't a stat for QB's, because NFL.com doesn't have it.

NFL.com does not have QBR either, yet you cite it regularly (and in this same argument).

so i can't say why Ratings were created ? because that is all i said

Oh cool you're trying to change the subject. K

W/L record is a a TEAM STAT.

W/L record as a starter is a QB stat, DL stat, OL stat, RB stat, etc.

No player in the NFL has a W/L record, though. Well maybe Gronk did and Kittle will because they're into that fake wrestling stuff.

There is W/L record as a participant and W/L record as a bench player that never entered the game as well. So what? Onlookers have the right to "record" whatever they want.

W/L record is still a team stat, and a team stat only. Until football rules gets rid of the other 20 players on the field, it will continue to be this way.

I mean do you want more myths?

It's not really year 2023, because the Earth is billions of yrs old.
Bulls don't really get mad when they "see" red, George Washington didnt really have wooden teeth, and bats aren't really blind.

I mean we can go on forever, lol.

Virtuslly all of the statistical record keepers in the NFL have tracked w-l for qbs and bot for any other players. Street and Smiths, Sporting News, Pro Football Weekly etc.

Your beef is with them.

It's not a team stat only. The NFL recognizes QB W/L record as an 'official' stat. It's in the NFL actual record book and fact guide from the league. QB is the only position the league does this.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Everyone calls w-l records a qb stat.

1st of all, this is a lie, and an entirely subjective statement,...as "everyone" doesn't "call" it anything

And even if they did, relying on what people "call" something admits that your argument is horribly flawed and flies right in the face of what u were arguing regarding "subjectivity."

I thought you were more interested in black and white facts?

There are about 22 guys contributing on both sides of the ball to your team's success. Not talking articles or clicks,....just talking reality. A corner blowing coverage twice can easily lead to a loss and 14 points the other way.

The fact is that wins and losses are a team stat, but do you see how fast you threw your lust for facts right out the window? I saw it coming a mile away.

My thesis is coming @ the end instead of the beginning,...but clearly, the evidence above shows that you gravitate to a couple numbers you like so you can make grandiose statements, whether they make sense or not. And you want to then use "numbers" to back them up because you can't argue "facts",...right?

If a guy is 50-10 as a starting QB, he's 50-10 as a starting QB. I hate to tell you this, but that is where the facts begin and end with that statement. No argument is included in it.

Nah a vast majority of people give wins to QBs. You guys are just being difficult imo. Just a quick Google of "QB wins" shows that it is a very very well known stat throughout all platforms of media. Even look at Super Bowls and how guys like Montana ad Brady are known for wins.

the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.

Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)

No..

where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?

and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?

Where's QBR on that link?

OMG it's not there, what shall we do

I don't know, you tell us. You're the one that set the standard that the only "real" stats are on NFL.com.

where did i say QBR has to be thee stat.. ?

if you read, i said that's why ratings and QBR were created to help with QB play.. not a stat

"the NFL doesn't record team stats to individuals.
Thats why QB Ratings and QBR was created to try help determine QB play (which still has it flaws)."

"where is the W/L record, https://www.nfl.com/stats/player-stats/ ?
and tell me why QB Rating and QBR was created ?"

is this supposed to be a gotcha moment, quoting why i said ratings were created lol ?

You said that W/L isn't a stat for QB's, because NFL.com doesn't have it.

NFL.com does not have QBR either, yet you cite it regularly (and in this same argument).

so i can't say why Ratings were created ? because that is all i said

Oh cool you're trying to change the subject. K

W/L record is a a TEAM STAT.

W/L record as a starter is a QB stat, DL stat, OL stat, RB stat, etc.

No player in the NFL has a W/L record, though. Well maybe Gronk did and Kittle will because they're into that fake wrestling stuff.

There is W/L record as a participant and W/L record as a bench player that never entered the game as well. So what? Onlookers have the right to "record" whatever they want.

W/L record is still a team stat, and a team stat only. Until football rules gets rid of the other 20 players on the field, it will continue to be this way.

I mean do you want more myths?

It's not really year 2023, because the Earth is billions of yrs old.
Bulls don't really get mad when they "see" red, George Washington didnt really have wooden teeth, and bats aren't really blind.

I mean we can go on forever, lol.

Virtuslly all of the statistical record keepers in the NFL have tracked w-l for qbs and bot for any other players. Street and Smiths, Sporting News, Pro Football Weekly etc.

Your beef is with them.

It's not a team stat only. The NFL recognizes QB W/L record as an 'official' stat. It's in the NFL actual record book and fact guide from the league. QB is the only position the league does this.

Is it on NFL.com though?