QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's not going to be QB1 with anyone. Watch him play. Maybe he can be a backup fullback.

agreed, but I think he could be an NFL TE

You guys make Seahawks fans look smart lol

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

Just curious, is that the DVOA Pass Defense for the teams at the time we played them, or overall for the regular season?

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

Challenge accepted!

This is what happens when you lock threads for individual Players. It just infects everything else. Might as well just keep it open.

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

A commanders defense that was ranked 4th in the league giving up 191.3 yards per game though the air, a defense that was 7th in the league in points allowed at 20.2 per game? WAS D is just as good as DAL D. I would argue that WAS has a better secondary than DAL. PHI D is better but they give up just any many points as WAS.

Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

My only concern is that he really hasn't been tested in late game scenarios.

Raiders game?

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's not going to be QB1 with anyone. Watch him play. Maybe he can be a backup fullback.

agreed, but I think he could be an NFL TE

He might be too injury prone to play FB or TE.

Originally posted by SlipAndSlideBosa:
This is what happens when you lock threads for individual Players. It just infects everything else. Might as well just keep it open.

or the mods can punish the known trolls instead of letting them run wild

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Crown:
We absolutely need to keep both, I think it would be foolish to trade Trey.

While I respect Jimmy's contributions, it's not worth resigning him if you keep Trey

Good thing we have a front office that knows this. We keep both and we don't worry about a QB injury for two or three seasons while we focus our efforts elsewhere while continuing to develop both guys cheaply. We are talking about guys that are both 22 and 23 years old!

Seriously. Thank God the front office isn't stupid enough to trade Trey Lance. It's like people forget we are on our 3rd string QB this year due to injuries.

The "Trade Trey" group dont want him traded for any reason that would benefit the team. It's just personal problems they have with him.

I like Trey a lot. But if we can get a first for him, and use that to draft a RT who we pay $8-$9m/year rather than pay McGlinchey $18-$20m/year, and use the rest to help re-sign Bosa and Aiyuk, it's a win. Plus it gives Trey a chance to develop rather than sit, which is better for him, so it's win/win. If you're truly a fan of Trey then you don't want him sitting the bench for the Niners.

Some of them clearly want to bench Purdy and play Trey instead.

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

Continuing his performance against much tougher defenses in win-or-go-home matchups is certainly a box.

Using the yardage stats as a measuring stick is okay but thise numbers are often the result of the score. For example, if a team like the Niners is ahead a lot like they have been down the stretch, they're going to give up more passing yards as teams try to catch up. At the same time hey'll give up fewer rushing yards because of fewer attempts. The reverse is true for the offense. Niners get way ahead and try to finish the game with runs. More rushing less passing.

This is one more in a long list of examples where stats only tell part of the story. You need to go back and look at the scoring summary and see if one team got a big early lead or if the game was close all day. Those factors have a huge effect on the passing and rushing numbers. How many times have you looked at stats after a game that was never really in doubt but the stats were close.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

A commanders defense that was ranked 4th in the league giving up 191.3 yards per game though the air, a defense that was 7th in the league in points allowed at 20.2 per game? WAS D is just as good as DAL D. I would argue that WAS has a better secondary than DAL. PHI D is better but they give up just any many points as WAS.

Pass defense? Who cares when they can't stop the run.

Just because you can stop receivers running typical receiver routes downfield doesn't mean you can stop Deebo from taking a drag route 70 yards

Originally posted by All22:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:
What more boxes can be checked today? How many has he already checked off?

DVOA pass defense ranks he's faced:

13 commanders
15 bucs
17 seahawks x 3
21 cards
25 dolphins
31 raiders

Dallas has the #3 pass defense in the league. So he has some boxes to check.

A commanders defense that was ranked 4th in the league giving up 191.3 yards per game though the air, a defense that was 7th in the league in points allowed at 20.2 per game? WAS D is just as good as DAL D. I would argue that WAS has a better secondary than DAL. PHI D is better but they give up just any many points as WAS.

Pass defense? Who cares when they can't stop the run.

Just because you can stop receivers running typical receiver routes downfield doesn't mean you can stop Deebo from taking a drag route 70 yards

Yes. Pass defense. This is the Brock Purdy thread, right? I had no idea we were discussing the entire offense.

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Crown:
We absolutely need to keep both, I think it would be foolish to trade Trey.

While I respect Jimmy's contributions, it's not worth resigning him if you keep Trey

Good thing we have a front office that knows this. We keep both and we don't worry about a QB injury for two or three seasons while we focus our efforts elsewhere while continuing to develop both guys cheaply. We are talking about guys that are both 22 and 23 years old!

Seriously. Thank God the front office isn't stupid enough to trade Trey Lance. It's like people forget we are on our 3rd string QB this year due to injuries.

The "Trade Trey" group dont want him traded for any reason that would benefit the team. It's just personal problems they have with him.

I like Trey a lot. But if we can get a first for him, and use that to draft a RT who we pay $8-$9m/year rather than pay McGlinchey $18-$20m/year, and use the rest to help re-sign Bosa and Aiyuk, it's a win. Plus it gives Trey a chance to develop rather than sit, which is better for him, so it's win/win. If you're truly a fan of Trey then you don't want him sitting the bench for the Niners.

Some of them clearly want to bench Purdy and play Trey instead.

Who? Haven't seen one person saying that.

Btw what was your username before this?

FYI, the idea behind the label Mr Irrelevant is that it's irrelevant where he was drafted, he still has the ability and chance to make it in the NFL and be relevant.