QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by mayo49:
No, Brock has the job, now it's trade Trey and get Brock locked up long term.

Lol can't do that for a couple years Mayo

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by tankle104:
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/49ers-levis-serving-purdy-burger-17734362.php
LOL the stadium is selling a BCB burger.

They messed that up. BCB hot dog makes much more sense.

LMAO looks like Purdy should be the one with all the corn dogs

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Crown:
We absolutely need to keep both, I think it would be foolish to trade Trey.

While I respect Jimmy's contributions, it's not worth resigning him if you keep Trey

Good thing we have a front office that knows this. We keep both and we don't worry about a QB injury for two or three seasons while we focus our efforts elsewhere while continuing to develop both guys cheaply. We are talking about guys that are both 22 and 23 years old!

Seriously. Thank God the front office isn't stupid enough to trade Trey Lance. It's like people forget we are on our 3rd string QB this year due to injuries.

The "Trade Trey" group dont want him traded for any reason that would benefit the team. It's just personal problems they have with him.

I like Trey a lot. But if we can get a first for him, and use that to draft a RT who we pay $8-$9m/year rather than pay McGlinchey $18-$20m/year, and use the rest to help re-sign Bosa and Aiyuk, it's a win. Plus it gives Trey a chance to develop rather than sit, which is better for him, so it's win/win. If you're truly a fan of Trey then you don't want him sitting the bench for the Niners.

Why does no one seem to understand that we're not getting 8-9 million per year in cap space if we trade Trey? We LOSE cap space if we trade Trey, and even if we wait until after June 1st, we still only end up saving like 3 million due to roughly 5-6 million in dead cap we'd have in that case, which isn't even enough to sign a new back up QB.

Great post, Furlow. I'm with you my brother.

We're not getting a first for Trey though. And we're losing money if we trade him.

I know, a 2nd and another pick or two is the next best thing. You never get back true value for a 1st rounder or any other pick. Just got to get what we can get.

The issue is similar to Jimmy. Teams know we have our QB of the future now, not to mention Trey's clearly injury-prone history.

Still, he's still got that strong arm and speed. So for us the issue comes down to whether or not whatever pick we get is worth the dead cap space, and frankly, you need a back up QB anyway, so I doubt we trade him next year.

I understand the cap ramafications, but think about Trey. He dearly wants a new start, now. Let him go and let him find a new team to continue his career. f**k the cap space.

I don't understand the cap ramifications. Why would trading Trey not free up cap space? Trades are always different. If a team is not willing to take on his contract, then yeah it makes no sense to trade him.

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by tankle104:
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/49ers-levis-serving-purdy-burger-17734362.php
LOL the stadium is selling a BCB burger.

They messed that up. BCB hot dog makes much more sense.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SLCNiner:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Crown:
We absolutely need to keep both, I think it would be foolish to trade Trey.

While I respect Jimmy's contributions, it's not worth resigning him if you keep Trey

Good thing we have a front office that knows this. We keep both and we don't worry about a QB injury for two or three seasons while we focus our efforts elsewhere while continuing to develop both guys cheaply. We are talking about guys that are both 22 and 23 years old!

Seriously. Thank God the front office isn't stupid enough to trade Trey Lance. It's like people forget we are on our 3rd string QB this year due to injuries.

The "Trade Trey" group dont want him traded for any reason that would benefit the team. It's just personal problems they have with him.

I like Trey a lot. But if we can get a first for him, and use that to draft a RT who we pay $8-$9m/year rather than pay McGlinchey $18-$20m/year, and use the rest to help re-sign Bosa and Aiyuk, it's a win. Plus it gives Trey a chance to develop rather than sit, which is better for him, so it's win/win. If you're truly a fan of Trey then you don't want him sitting the bench for the Niners.

Why does no one seem to understand that we're not getting 8-9 million per year in cap space if we trade Trey? We LOSE cap space if we trade Trey, and even if we wait until after June 1st, we still only end up saving like 3 million due to roughly 5-6 million in dead cap we'd have in that case, which isn't even enough to sign a new back up QB.

Great post, Furlow. I'm with you my brother.

We're not getting a first for Trey though. And we're losing money if we trade him.

I know, a 2nd and another pick or two is the next best thing. You never get back true value for a 1st rounder or any other pick. Just got to get what we can get.

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
We have the most stacked roster in the NFL.

We have 11 picks in the upcoming draft.

I'm not sweating getting something back for Trey when Trey has immense value as the backup and far better with elite starter upside than any trash journeyman backup we would sign.

If Brock goes down Trey could just as easily come in and light it up and we don't lose a beat just like this year.

We are keeping Trey.

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
We have the most stacked roster in the NFL.

We have 11 picks in the upcoming draft.

I'm not sweating getting something back for Trey when Trey has immense value as the backup and far better with elite starter upside than any trash journeyman backup we would sign.

If Brock goes down Trey could just as easily come in and light it up and we don't lose a beat just like this year.

We are keeping Trey.

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
We have the most stacked roster in the NFL.

We have 11 picks in the upcoming draft.

I'm not sweating getting something back for Trey when Trey has immense value as the backup and far better with elite starter upside than any trash journeyman backup we would sign.

If Brock goes down Trey could just as easily come in and light it up and we don't lose a beat just like this year.

We are keeping Trey.

Of course we're keeping Trey because he's cheap and he's gonna be at LEAST as good as Jalen Hurts was this year

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
We have the most stacked roster in the NFL.

We have 11 picks in the upcoming draft.

I'm not sweating getting something back for Trey when Trey has immense value as the backup and far better with elite starter upside than any trash journeyman backup we would sign.

If Brock goes down Trey could just as easily come in and light it up and we don't lose a beat just like this year.

We are keeping Trey.

Of course we're keeping Trey because he's cheap and he's gonna be at LEAST as good as Jalen Hurts was this year

It is ridiculously optimistic to say you know a guy who hasn't prove anything in the NFL to be at least as good as someone who is in the MVP conversation this season.

If what you said is true, we can easily get 3 1st and a 3rd back Probably can even more.

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
We have the most stacked roster in the NFL.

We have 11 picks in the upcoming draft.

I'm not sweating getting something back for Trey when Trey has immense value as the backup and far better with elite starter upside than any trash journeyman backup we would sign.

If Brock goes down Trey could just as easily come in and light it up and we don't lose a beat just like this year.

We are keeping Trey.

Of course we're keeping Trey because he's cheap and he's gonna be at LEAST as good as Jalen Hurts was this year

It is ridiculously optimistic to say you know a guy who hasn't prove anything in the NFL to be at least as good as someone who is in the MVP conversation this season.

If what you said is true, we can easily get 3 1st and a 3rd back Probably can even more.

Originally posted by mayo49:
No, Brock has the job, now it's trade Trey and get Brock locked up long term.

Originally posted by eric_anthony:

Originally posted by mayo49:
No, Brock has the job, now it's trade Trey and get Brock locked up long term.

Glad you're not in charge. So quick to trade Trey with all the upside he has. Have you forgotten how often our QB's get injured? s**t Brock already got an oblique injury. Who are you getting to back up Brock?