QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

Yes it does. It's a ridiculous take. I love what Brock has done for this team. But to say it's not ridiculous that someone would take him over Josh Allen is insane. Every GM in football would take Allen.

lol my post didn't even mention Allen. It was statistically the last 7 starts Purdy has the edge, simple facts..... now you guys want to talk about bad takes lol

I'm sorry, was I quoting you or another poster who DID bring up Josh Allen?

Weird reply bro.

you quoted some one which was replying in my original post.....who spun in to as if I was saying Purdy>Allen lol.... good takes bro..

The conversation evolved LMAO. My post had absolutely zero to do with you or your post. Two posters later was the person I replied to. This was never about you.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Yes I agree. You are right. A QB needs to be great between the ears. Understand the offensive concepts, read the defense, go through reads and progressions, make the right decision, get the ball out quick, have excellent mechanics, throw an accurate catchable ball.

Like Brock Purdy.

Love Brock Purdy and what he has done for this team so far. Including playoffs Josh Allen has 148 touchdowns in the last 3 seasons. One hundred and forty eight.

What are we doing here?

Playing fantasy football apparently.

Yeah because scoring touchdowns is just a fantasy football thing.

How many Super Bowls has Josh Allen carried his team to win?

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Most media are like Hurts>Purdy but its crazy to look at their stats the Last 7 starts

Hurts Purdy
7-0 W/L 7-0
234.0 PASS YPG 234.9
64.8 COMP PCT 66.7
10-3 PASS TD-INT 14-2
96.8 PASS RTG 116.0
17 PASS+RUSH TD 16

I'd give the edge to Purdy lol

Hurts is better. He was having an MVP year before he got hurt.

And you gotta take into account how dangerous of a runner he is.

Some of these takes need to stop. I love Purdy, but come on...Even saw a poster a couple days ago say that they rather have Purdy than Allen.

Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

I've said repeatedly I'd take Purdy over Allen. People are just obsessed with tall QB's who throw the ball far. Sportscenter highlights is as far as they go in their "analysis" of other QB's.

Not a bad take at all.

Well, it is to the anti-Jimmy crowd who hitched their wagon to Trey and Trey only. "The game has changed" crowd. They think NFL QB's need to run 4.4 and throw the ball 70-80 yards. That recipe makes for great highlights, but does not translate to long term success. Purdy will have a better career than Allen and Hurts (hilarious that anyone would put him over Purdy based on body of work when Hurts has had one good season and relies on his legs to set up the pass).

Not at all. I haven't been bashing JG, but been as vocal as anyone about how much he held our offense, and team in general back. I'm a 49ers lover, not a Jimmy hater and just wanted a QB who didn't turn the ball over once a game, showed up in the playoffs and could help us compete in games where the defense didn't play lights out. Now that I've seen Brock do every one of those things, I'm cool with him being our QB. I don't think there's a single person in the forum that's "Trey and Trey only". We just wanted better QB play, and now we have it.

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Most media are like Hurts>Purdy but its crazy to look at their stats the Last 7 starts

Hurts Purdy
7-0 W/L 7-0
234.0 PASS YPG 234.9
64.8 COMP PCT 66.7
10-3 PASS TD-INT 14-2
96.8 PASS RTG 116.0
17 PASS+RUSH TD 16

I'd give the edge to Purdy lol

Well Hurts just can't be a FQB either because he's only 6'1"…
Same knock on Purdy.

This is why I said for Brock this game is of particular importance to Brock in one small way going forward

Here is where he can completely dispel to Kyle the notion he NEEDS a Jalen Hurts type athlete at the QB position to win the Super Bowl by breathing this PHI team this week.

We drafted Trey Lance to develop him into being exactly what Jalen Hurts is now but he got hurt this very year when we attempting to begin that process. Trey when developed should theoretically be able to do all that Hurts is doing

BUT if we win this game then this proves to anyone observing that you can win in todays game still without a QB with superstar athletic tangible traits in the biggest of games when you have a QB with ELITE intangibles and some tangibles if your guy is Brock Purdy

I'm VERY interested in this matchup and I'm looking forward to Brock proving wrong all of his naysayers in this game because it would make the most dramatic of statements and THEN I want to see what all those chirping now will have to say after this game

I disagree. The result in this game doesn't change anything. Tom Brady already proved you can win without superstar athletic tangible traits. He last won in the 2020 season, not too long ago.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

Yes it does. It's a ridiculous take. I love what Brock has done for this team. But to say it's not ridiculous that someone would take him over Josh Allen is insane. Every GM in football would take Allen.

that does not making something right or wrong....

Every GM in football would take Josh Allen over Rookie Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Starbach, and Theisman, too.

Are they right?

This reminds me of the old Phil Simms or Joe Montana conversations.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

Yes it does. It's a ridiculous take. I love what Brock has done for this team. But to say it's not ridiculous that someone would take him over Josh Allen is insane. Every GM in football would take Allen.

lol my post didn't even mention Allen. It was statistically the last 7 starts Purdy has the edge, simple facts..... now you guys want to talk about bad takes lol

I'm sorry, was I quoting you or another poster who DID bring up Josh Allen?

Weird reply bro.

you quoted some one which was replying in my original post.....who spun in to as if I was saying Purdy>Allen lol.... good takes bro..

The conversation evolved LMAO. My post had absolutely zero to do with you or your post. Two posters later was the person I replied to. This was never about you.

lol oh lord..

Originally posted by libertyforever:
I disagree. The result in this game doesn't change anything. Tom Brady already proved you can win without superstar athletic tangible traits. He last won in the 2020 season, not too long ago.

Nope. Brady couldn't lift a weak team over Dak Prescott because Tom Brady has to have certain specific things in place in order to win. When I saw that game I said to myself that the game has passed Tom Brady by

You would be remiss to not think that Purdy being able to extend plays and buy guys time didn't help him vs SEA. Now he could not do that vs DAL athletic pass rushers but he did move the sticks once or twice nonetheless with his mobility

Jimmy was getting us to the chip but we didn't win and THATS the standard. When we got beat by Mahomes it sunk in to Kyle that he can scheme all he wants and even have the number one defense but when the chip is on the line a superstar talent like Mahomes can beat your defense and cause all types of conflict and break all the rules and transcend all you've planned and beat you

He made that trade up to select Trey to become a superstar. That's what Hurts had played like and that is what Purdy must beat. A Hurts a Mahomes a Joe Burrow. He has to actually go and beat these guys and if or when he does we won't need to second or third guess anything moving forward with him

I think it should be clear to 49er fans that winning it all is the only thing and that's why Kyle didn't settle on Jimmy and moved heaven and earth for Trey and yet here we are with Purdy so far doing all we could have hoped for as a backup. But now we need him to do more and win two games and then we can look beyond three firsts and some change and say we found our guy that can not just play well and get to the Super Bowl ala Jimmy G. We can say we have a Super Bowl winning franchise QB

Thats what we are looking for and we aren't settling for anything less. Jed York showed us that with Harbaugh and these coaching changes. Dude said getting to the Super Bowl ain't the goal. Winning is. We are not going to be satisfied until we win it all

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

Yes it does. It's a ridiculous take. I love what Brock has done for this team. But to say it's not ridiculous that someone would take him over Josh Allen is insane. Every GM in football would take Allen.

that does not making something right or wrong....

Every GM in football would take Josh Allen over Rookie Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Starbach, and Theisman, too.

Are they right?

This reminds me of the old Phil Simms or Joe Montana conversations.

Forget physical measurables. Josh Allen single handedly cost his team several times this season including his last game because of his need to play hero ball. I don't want that. I will take intelligence and maturity over physical gifts anyday.

Originally posted by Sickaa:
This place Is nuts lol. .

Anyways, I think we'll beat the Eagles by running the ball as much as possible.

It's the same people all the time. Thankfully it's a very small minority, otherwise our fan base would be a laughing stock like the Seahawks/Cowboys fan base.

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by qnnhan7:

Brock Purdy is proof that scouts are wrong all the time. pic.twitter.com/qQarwVe2RN

— Underdog Fantasy (@UnderdogFantasy) January 25, 2023

Steve Smith is a big Niners fan.

This is why I seldom really bag on guys in the draft threads.

Scouts are wrong

all

the

time

is a fact.

There is plenty of room for fan opinion in the NFL draft.

Why is this said over and over on a yearly basis? It's like a constant reminder that water is still wet.

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Lmao @ Furlow.

I guess it's whatever, being a homer isn't something new.

In the end who knows, it is possible I suppose that Purdy can be that good as them or better, but he's not there yet. Love what he's doing so far though

Did you see all the guys (him and Jonny included) that were choosing Jimmy over Allen just a few months ago?

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
Doesn't seem like a bad take. Allen has been a turnover machine and Purdy has been a 3rd down machine. One is in the conference finals while the other will be watching from home.

Yes it does. It's a ridiculous take. I love what Brock has done for this team. But to say it's not ridiculous that someone would take him over Josh Allen is insane. Every GM in football would take Allen.

Every GM in football makes mistakes every year based on physical measurables, particularly at the QB position. This is well known.

Then why is it repeated over and over?

And your reply isint at all related to the previous post, btw.

Funny how Grant Cohn is thinking Purdy might not be the answer at QB because he missed a few passes in the Cowboys game.

Originally posted by SlipAndSlideBosa:
Funny how Grant Cohn is thinking Purdy might not be the answer at QB because he missed a few passes in the Cowboys game.

He didn't miss much in that game. Grant Cohn is an idiot anyway. His takes are terrible on almost everything.

Originally posted by SlipAndSlideBosa:
Funny how Grant Cohn is thinking Purdy might not be the answer at QB because he missed a few passes in the Cowboys game.

Lol let people think as they wish. It wasn't his best game, btw. Did what he needed to overall.