LISTEN: Purdy, Pearsall, And The 49ers Second Half →

There are 155 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Altho this is a BP thread, it could just as easily be a 49er QB thread. The deal between Brock and Trey will ultimately answer itself due to how each of them is physically and where they are in being ready to play football. Once both are healthy, and throwing without discomfort, the play of each QB will determine who starts for us. So for right now, what we do is anyone's guess.

The other question, however, and it is no small matter, is who our #3 QB is. With Jimmy there we were fairly well situated , until the broken foot and then we were left with Brock and Josh Johnson. As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise. Both JL and Kyle recognize this so who we finally add as #3 will be interesting.

Darnold? I just can't see it. Teddy Bridgewater…. Has had some great games, unfortunately mixed with some bad ones. Derek Carr is unaffordable and will go to a franchise with NO QB. (ATL, HOU). ARod…ha! He'd be a good pick if we needed a HC and GM also. Imagine AR as a teammate….and nobody wants that. Besides again ,he is unaffordable. That probably means another #232 pick or thereabouts, maybe UDFA. But the likelihood we get a retread like Josh J, is poor. We've done that, and results were disappointing. So look for us taking a late 7th rd pick vs UDFA for our #3 Qb.

Hard to imagine Kyle getting a retread #3 QB with bad habits and will most likely go with a young guy who kyle can coach up. But don't expect another BP…that was an extra-ordinary pick. Superior scouting skills did the job, and KS/JL signed on

No one expects to be down to their 4th string practice squad QB. Its not common to keep more than 3 QB's on the 53. You cannot expect to have starting quality players waiting in the wings on the practice squad. Last season was very unfortunate. We will sign a vet for between 6-8 million a year to be our #3. We wouldn't even be spending that if Brock were healthy. We may draft a QB, we may pick up an UDFA QB but we shouldn't expect them to be starting quality at all next season. Especially not NFCCG in hostile territory starting quality.

Do you really think so? I'm not sure I'd be the biggest fan of that move. I'm 100% confident in Brock's abilities and just as hopeful in Trey's. I'd much rather put that money towards the OL in an attempt to not need the #3 to ever see the field. I know both Brock and Trey are young, but that isn't a good reason to spend that much on a position with little chance of seeing the field.

Like I said, If Brock were healthy than no way we would spend that kind of money. It is unkown when Brock will actually be back. What if Trey goes down before Brock is back, what then?

I think my question is should we go blow $6-8 mil on a Darnold? Or one of his caliber? Bridgewater would be a better deal but no idea what he commands $$$wise. I'd actually rather we take a rd 6 or 7 or UDFA QB that kyle and john like and then hope he turns out to be Brock 2 . Chances of that are slim, and i know it.

Above Dj mentions we won't know what we have until after surgery…but really, for us to know what we have with Brrock, we won't know until 3, maybe 6 months out. So if we go buy a 3rd string QB for say $7 mil, we will have wasted it if both Trey and Brock are okay come Sept 2023. OTOH, if we go with a late rd Qb, (or UDFA), we spare blowing $$ on an unnecessary QB. Downside is if BOTH Trey and Brock don't rebound, then yes, we would be up the creek with no paddle.

Looking back at Brock's preseason films, it is easy to see that he has "IT". If there is a guy even remotely close to Brock in rd 7 or UDFA, I'd rather go that route than bringing in a $7 mil 3rd QB. With QB salaries now in the $45-50 mil range, backups are going to get an undeserved salary boost also.
I'd rather go with late rd or UDFA that JL can find for us.
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Altho this is a BP thread, it could just as easily be a 49er QB thread. The deal between Brock and Trey will ultimately answer itself due to how each of them is physically and where they are in being ready to play football. Once both are healthy, and throwing without discomfort, the play of each QB will determine who starts for us. So for right now, what we do is anyone's guess.

The other question, however, and it is no small matter, is who our #3 QB is. With Jimmy there we were fairly well situated , until the broken foot and then we were left with Brock and Josh Johnson. As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise. Both JL and Kyle recognize this so who we finally add as #3 will be interesting.

Darnold? I just can't see it. Teddy Bridgewater…. Has had some great games, unfortunately mixed with some bad ones. Derek Carr is unaffordable and will go to a franchise with NO QB. (ATL, HOU). ARod…ha! He'd be a good pick if we needed a HC and GM also. Imagine AR as a teammate….and nobody wants that. Besides again ,he is unaffordable. That probably means another #232 pick or thereabouts, maybe UDFA. But the likelihood we get a retread like Josh J, is poor. We've done that, and results were disappointing. So look for us taking a late 7th rd pick vs UDFA for our #3 Qb.

Hard to imagine Kyle getting a retread #3 QB with bad habits and will most likely go with a young guy who kyle can coach up. But don't expect another BP…that was an extra-ordinary pick. Superior scouting skills did the job, and KS/JL signed on

No one expects to be down to their 4th string practice squad QB. Its not common to keep more than 3 QB's on the 53. You cannot expect to have starting quality players waiting in the wings on the practice squad. Last season was very unfortunate. We will sign a vet for between 6-8 million a year to be our #3. We wouldn't even be spending that if Brock were healthy. We may draft a QB, we may pick up an UDFA QB but we shouldn't expect them to be starting quality at all next season. Especially not NFCCG in hostile territory starting quality.

Do you really think so? I'm not sure I'd be the biggest fan of that move. I'm 100% confident in Brock's abilities and just as hopeful in Trey's. I'd much rather put that money towards the OL in an attempt to not need the #3 to ever see the field. I know both Brock and Trey are young, but that isn't a good reason to spend that much on a position with little chance of seeing the field.

Like I said, If Brock were healthy than no way we would spend that kind of money. It is unkown when Brock will actually be back. What if Trey goes down before Brock is back, what then?

I think my question is should we go blow $6-8 mil on a Darnold? Or one of his caliber? Bridgewater would be a better deal but no idea what he commands $$$wise. I'd actually rather we take a rd 6 or 7 or UDFA QB that kyle and john like and then hope he turns out to be Brock 2 . Chances of that are slim, and i know it.

Above Dj mentions we won't know what we have until after surgery…but really, for us to know what we have with Brrock, we won't know until 3, maybe 6 months out. So if we go buy a 3rd string QB for say $7 mil, we will have wasted it if both Trey and Brock are okay come Sept 2023. OTOH, if we go with a late rd Qb, (or UDFA), we spare blowing $$ on an unnecessary QB. Downside is if BOTH Trey and Brock don't rebound, then yes, we would be up the creek with no paddle.

Looking back at Brock's preseason films, it is easy to see that he has "IT". If there is a guy even remotely close to Brock in rd 7 or UDFA, I'd rather go that route than bringing in a $7 mil 3rd QB. With QB salaries now in the $45-50 mil range, backups are going to get an undeserved salary boost also.
I'd rather go with late rd or UDFA that JL can find for us.

What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.
[ Edited by YACBros85 on Feb 26, 2023 at 6:01 PM ]
Originally posted by YACBros85:
What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.

Exactly my sentiments. We have two good young ones on the cheap so let's drat another one and bring in a league minimum vet camp arm to help Trey and the rookie take reps and go on with extending our own talent and perhaps adding another FA at another position
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.

Exactly my sentiments. We have two good young ones on the cheap so let's drat another one and bring in a league minimum vet camp arm to help Trey and the rookie take reps and go on with extending our own talent and perhaps adding another FA at another position

we have Purdy and he played very very well last season.. who's the 2nd one are you pertaining to that is good?
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.

Exactly my sentiments. We have two good young ones on the cheap so let's drat another one and bring in a league minimum vet camp arm to help Trey and the rookie take reps and go on with extending our own talent and perhaps adding another FA at another position

we have Purdy and he played very very well last season.. who's the 2nd one are you pertaining to that is good?

You're on the 9th moon so are you near Pluto or are you not aware the one Trey Lance will be our week one starter the second season in a row at the age of 23? Trey plus Brock equals 2 so take out your abacus and calculate. 1 plus 1 is 2! One guy will be 23 and the other 24 nest season. I think we are fine with another rookie and a cheap vet coming into TC and then hopefully we have three going into the season once Brock is healthy. Ideally we stash the rookie on the practice squad or just keep him on the 53 if we truly have to as we did with Brock
Brock_STAR throws touchdowns and wins games. He has great football IQ. Excellent mechanics and accuracy.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Brock_STAR throws touchdowns and wins games. He has great football IQ. Excellent mechanics and accuracy.


Brock has come to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and he's all out of bubblegum
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Brock_STAR throws touchdowns and wins games. He has great football IQ. Excellent mechanics and accuracy.


Brock has come to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and he's all out of bubblegum
Brock Purdy will be stronger

Brock coming back next season like Henry

Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.

Exactly my sentiments. We have two good young ones on the cheap so let's drat another one and bring in a league minimum vet camp arm to help Trey and the rookie take reps and go on with extending our own talent and perhaps adding another FA at another position

we have Purdy and he played very very well last season.. who's the 2nd one are you pertaining to that is good?

You're on the 9th moon so are you near Pluto or are you not aware the one Trey Lance will be our week one starter the second season in a row at the age of 23? Trey plus Brock equals 2 so take out your abacus and calculate. 1 plus 1 is 2! One guy will be 23 and the other 24 nest season. I think we are fine with another rookie and a cheap vet coming into TC and then hopefully we have three going into the season once Brock is healthy. Ideally we stash the rookie on the practice squad or just keep him on the 53 if we truly have to as we did with Brock

I was just wondering who the the other GOOD QB you had in mind.. since we actually haven't seen Trey play enough to determine his " grade " .. good or bad..

I guess we gonna give him a GOOD starting point already w/o earning it?
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Brock_STAR throws touchdowns and wins games. He has great football IQ. Excellent mechanics and accuracy.


Brock has come to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and he's all out of bubblegum

Hopefully Brock learns to step up into a clean pocket. If there is one knock on him, its his reluctance to climb the pocket, leaving the pocket too soon and drifting backwards.
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
What triggered my response was this.

As we saw, that didn't work out like anyone expected. Basically it proved that we HAVE to have a real 3rd Qb to protect us from injury. When Brock went down, we were screwed QB wise.

Brock Purdy turned out to be the best 3rd string QB in the league and it still didn't work out in our favor. So again, expecting to have a 4th string QB or even a 3rd string QB to be good enough to get us to the SB is asking too much. If Brock is expected back before the season starts, I wouldn't even spend money in FA on a QB. I would be more inclined to just grab a mid to late round QB. But if Brock is looking at a longer recovery time, say like 7-9 months, it would be wise to spend the money for someone to back up Trey.

Exactly my sentiments. We have two good young ones on the cheap so let's drat another one and bring in a league minimum vet camp arm to help Trey and the rookie take reps and go on with extending our own talent and perhaps adding another FA at another position

we have Purdy and he played very very well last season.. who's the 2nd one are you pertaining to that is good?

You're on the 9th moon so are you near Pluto or are you not aware the one Trey Lance will be our week one starter the second season in a row at the age of 23? Trey plus Brock equals 2 so take out your abacus and calculate. 1 plus 1 is 2! One guy will be 23 and the other 24 nest season. I think we are fine with another rookie and a cheap vet coming into TC and then hopefully we have three going into the season once Brock is healthy. Ideally we stash the rookie on the practice squad or just keep him on the 53 if we truly have to as we did with Brock

I was just wondering who the the other GOOD QB you had in mind.. since we actually haven't seen Trey play enough to determine his " grade " .. good or bad..

I guess we gonna give him a GOOD starting point already w/o earning it?

Didn't you hear? Trey is already on mahomes level and is in line for a hall of fame career just because he is an athlete and was drafted at #3.

Can he at least show us anything before some of these posters anoint him?
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Brock_STAR throws touchdowns and wins games. He has great football IQ. Excellent mechanics and accuracy.


Brock has come to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and he's all out of bubblegum

Hopefully Brock learns to step up into a clean pocket. If there is one knock on him, its his reluctance to climb the pocket, leaving the pocket too soon and drifting backwards.

Ya if I had to nit pick, that's definitely one area he needs improvement in. Overall he has good pocket awareness, just needs to get better at stepping up in the pocket. If he can do that as well, he's gonna be a very solid QB.
Originally posted by 9moon:
I was just wondering who the the other GOOD QB you had in mind.. since we actually haven't seen Trey play enough to determine his " grade " .. good or bad..

I guess we gonna give him a GOOD starting point already w/o earning it?

He's going to be under center week 1 as QB1. Is that GOOD enough for you?
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Didn't you hear? Trey is already on mahomes level and is in line for a hall of fame career just because he is an athlete and was drafted at #3.

Can he at least show us anything before some of these posters anoint him?

I said we have to good young guys. Not great or elite but good enough to play and develop and cheap enough to shoulder the bumps in the road. Build on what we have and not get crazy overspending on expensive vets when we have players needing extending

All the doom and gloom by posters here gives me questions
Share 49ersWebzone