QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I'm not sure of that. Kyle will certainly give Trey every chance to win the job. It's up to him now. If Purdy's recovery takes longer than hoped, Trey will get more opportunities.

Trey is gonna be week 1 starter. If he's winning he's playing if he's losing Brock's playing once he's healthy. Any QB coming in not a Brady or Rodgers are gonna be behind Trey and Brock to start the season because they know the system and as for Brock once he's healthy he's gonna be pushing for starter so Trey has to ball out just to keep his slot to start the season

And it's a win-win for the 49ers if Trey plays well. He's either the future or we can potentially trade him down the line.

And to all the posters who think we'll sign a veteran QB, we would lose a comp pick if that FA signs a contract similar to Jimmy. It's a lose-lose situation. So glad some of you are not out GM.

Because we might lose one of our half dozen annual comp picks? lol

If Brock can make it back before week 1, we should not spend money on a vet FA QB. If Brock's recovery time is well into the season, we should absolutely bring in a vet FA QB to back up Trey.

The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

Anyone thinking that we should bring in a QB to take Trey's job is obviously not in line with Kyle and John. That is just not going to happen.

Originally posted by Waterbear:
The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

People are probably just fearful of what the team will look like without good QBing. Not everyone can do the job...so people gravitate to people they know can do the job. Plus the 49ers just washed out of the playoffs with no functioning QB, and right now the team still has two hurt QBs.....

Sure Lance should be back to start the season, but he has never shown the ability to start three games in a row, let alone what he will might look like starting a game. We have seen great stuff and terrible stuff from Trey.

It is not really that silly for fans to want to hedge against the worst possible outcome.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I'm not sure of that. Kyle will certainly give Trey every chance to win the job. It's up to him now. If Purdy's recovery takes longer than hoped, Trey will get more opportunities.

Trey is gonna be week 1 starter. If he's winning he's playing if he's losing Brock's playing once he's healthy. Any QB coming in not a Brady or Rodgers are gonna be behind Trey and Brock to start the season because they know the system and as for Brock once he's healthy he's gonna be pushing for starter so Trey has to ball out just to keep his slot to start the season

And it's a win-win for the 49ers if Trey plays well. He's either the future or we can potentially trade him down the line.

And to all the posters who think we'll sign a veteran QB, we would lose a comp pick if that FA signs a contract similar to Jimmy. It's a lose-lose situation. So glad some of you are not out GM.

Because we might lose one of our half dozen annual comp picks? lol

If Brock can make it back before week 1, we should not spend money on a vet FA QB. If Brock's recovery time is well into the season, we should absolutely bring in a vet FA QB to back up Trey.

The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

Anyone thinking that we should bring in a QB to take Trey's job is obviously not in line with Kyle and John. That is just not going to happen.

That way of thinking was changed when we had to play 4 different QB's in one season. So I think there's a good possibility of bringing a cheap vet QB. If Matt Ryan lands in that description, I don't mind the team bringing him onboard. He knows Kyle and his system and even if he wouldn't get the opportunity to start, I think he's matured and smart enough to guide, mentor, and help develop our young and future FQB's. He also used to be a very successful pocket QB( I think when it comes to this, he's better than Jimmy and less injury history, too) so Purdy and Trey can soak up a lot of wisdom and knowledge from him.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Someone worth checking out

We have released QB Marcus Mariota

— Atlanta Falcons (@AtlantaFalcons) February 28, 2023

pass
sign Matt Ryan to run the offense and move the team and keep Brock's seat warm if he can't start week 1

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Someone worth checking out

We have released QB Marcus Mariota

— Atlanta Falcons (@AtlantaFalcons) February 28, 2023

pass
sign Matt Ryan to run the offense and move the team and keep Brock's seat warm if he can't start week 1

MM walked out on his team, Pass

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
pass
sign Matt Ryan to run the offense and move the team and keep Brock's seat warm if he can't start week 1

Matt Ryan is burnt toast right now compared to Mariota

He turns 38.. which is old as dirt for anyone not named Tom Brady

I would put Mariota several tiers ahead, particularly if we are looking for a guy who can use his legs to stress the defense a bit, which presumably we are, as we drafted TL for that purpose in part.

Originally posted by Heroism:

Christian McCaffrey talking about the mood when Brock Purdy started for the #49ers on @BussinWTB:

"To hear the defense talk about Brock, cause those are the guys going against him in scout team. They were huge fans, like 'oh no, he can ball.'" pic.twitter.com/8aMD54C3o2

— Akash Anavarathan (@akashanav) February 28, 2023

I recall a clip from the play where Purdy rolled right, jocked an outside blitz, and completed a first-down pass to Deebo. DeMeco turned to the defense and said, "Baller man." Warner said, "I'm not surprised." Someone else said, "I am not astonished." Such was the mood.

Originally posted by 49erF90:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I'm not sure of that. Kyle will certainly give Trey every chance to win the job. It's up to him now. If Purdy's recovery takes longer than hoped, Trey will get more opportunities.

Trey is gonna be week 1 starter. If he's winning he's playing if he's losing Brock's playing once he's healthy. Any QB coming in not a Brady or Rodgers are gonna be behind Trey and Brock to start the season because they know the system and as for Brock once he's healthy he's gonna be pushing for starter so Trey has to ball out just to keep his slot to start the season

And it's a win-win for the 49ers if Trey plays well. He's either the future or we can potentially trade him down the line.

And to all the posters who think we'll sign a veteran QB, we would lose a comp pick if that FA signs a contract similar to Jimmy. It's a lose-lose situation. So glad some of you are not out GM.

Because we might lose one of our half dozen annual comp picks? lol

If Brock can make it back before week 1, we should not spend money on a vet FA QB. If Brock's recovery time is well into the season, we should absolutely bring in a vet FA QB to back up Trey.

The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

Anyone thinking that we should bring in a QB to take Trey's job is obviously not in line with Kyle and John. That is just not going to happen.

That way of thinking was changed when we had to play 4 different QB's in one season. So I think there's a good possibility of bringing a cheap vet QB. If Matt Ryan lands in that description, I don't mind the team bringing him onboard. He knows Kyle and his system and even if he wouldn't get the opportunity to start, I think he's matured and smart enough to guide, mentor, and help develop our young and future FQB's. He also used to be a very successful pocket QB( I think when it comes to this, he's better than Jimmy and less injury history, too) so Purdy and Trey can soak up a lot of wisdom and knowledge from him.

That way of thinking has not been changed. They can bring in Ryan, Wentz, Mariota, etc. but they will not be competing for QB1 which is what I was referring to with my post. If they were looking to bring someone in to start over Trey and essentially Brock, it would have to be more like Carr, Rodgers or Brady. I have no issue with them bringing someone in to back up Trey. Especially in order to give Brock the time he needs to come back 100%.

Originally posted by Dshearn:
People are probably just fearful of what the team will look like without good QBing. Not everyone can do the job...so people gravitate to people they know can do the job. Plus the 49ers just washed out of the playoffs with no functioning QB, and right now the team still has two hurt QBs.....

Sure Lance should be back to start the season, but he has never shown the ability to start three games in a row, let alone what he will might look like starting a game. We have seen great stuff and terrible stuff from Trey.

It is not really that silly for fans to want to hedge against the worst possible outcome.

That's why fans don't run the team. Kyle and John do and Paraag runs the money. Fans just run their mouths. I'm going to just watch the games and give guys hell on this messaging board

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

People are probably just fearful of what the team will look like without good QBing. Not everyone can do the job...so people gravitate to people they know can do the job. Plus the 49ers just washed out of the playoffs with no functioning QB, and right now the team still has two hurt QBs.....

Sure Lance should be back to start the season, but he has never shown the ability to start three games in a row, let alone what he will might look like starting a game. We have seen great stuff and terrible stuff from Trey.

It is not really that silly for fans to want to hedge against the worst possible outcome.

I was specifically stating that its silly fans would want someone to start ahead of Trey, when you would ruin his development as QB1, provided he plays better than Purdy or the potential trade compensation for him if he plays well... but not better than Purdy, and you would miss out on comp pick for Jimmy.

I guarantee you we'll find a better a better QB3 option than Josh Johnson two thirds the way through the season. That's not even a question IMO.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

People are probably just fearful of what the team will look like without good QBing. Not everyone can do the job...so people gravitate to people they know can do the job. Plus the 49ers just washed out of the playoffs with no functioning QB, and right now the team still has two hurt QBs.....

Sure Lance should be back to start the season, but he has never shown the ability to start three games in a row, let alone what he will might look like starting a game. We have seen great stuff and terrible stuff from Trey.

It is not really that silly for fans to want to hedge against the worst possible outcome.

I was specifically stating that its silly fans would want someone to start ahead of Trey, when you would ruin his development as QB1, provided he plays better than Purdy or the potential trade compensation for him if he plays well... but not better than Purdy, and you would miss out on comp pick for Jimmy.

I guarantee you we'll find a better a better QB3 option than Josh Johnson two thirds the way through the season. That's not even a question IMO.

JJ wasn't QB3, he was QB4 essentially and no one carries 4 QB's on their 53 throughout the season.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by Waterbear:
The good teams understand the value of a cheap QB room. I'm all for signing a FA to a small deal. But some posters here are suggesting to sign a bigger name FA to start ahead of Trey. I think that's silly as it hurts the team in multiple ways, not just one.

People are probably just fearful of what the team will look like without good QBing. Not everyone can do the job...so people gravitate to people they know can do the job. Plus the 49ers just washed out of the playoffs with no functioning QB, and right now the team still has two hurt QBs.....

Sure Lance should be back to start the season, but he has never shown the ability to start three games in a row, let alone what he will might look like starting a game. We have seen great stuff and terrible stuff from Trey.

It is not really that silly for fans to want to hedge against the worst possible outcome.

I was specifically stating that its silly fans would want someone to start ahead of Trey, when you would ruin his development as QB1, provided he plays better than Purdy or the potential trade compensation for him if he plays well... but not better than Purdy, and you would miss out on comp pick for Jimmy.

I guarantee you we'll find a better a better QB3 option than Josh Johnson two thirds the way through the season. That's not even a question IMO.

JJ wasn't QB3, he was QB4 essentially and no one carries 4 QB's on their 53 throughout the season.

QB4.. my bad

In our run-oriented offense MM would fit right in. He can also be a runner and will play action pass to keep defenses honest. Shanahan could definitely work with him. Only thing is get him in early to learn the offense.

Originally posted by Heroism:

Christian McCaffrey talking about the mood when Brock Purdy started for the #49ers on @BussinWTB:

"To hear the defense talk about Brock, cause those are the guys going against him in scout team. They were huge fans, like 'oh no, he can ball.'" pic.twitter.com/8aMD54C3o2

— Akash Anavarathan (@akashanav) February 28, 2023